schmerpyleo

what if condoms had temporary tattoos so when u roll this shit off, bam dinosaur on your dick

@ant_dracula @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks

@ppadjwjs @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks 👍🤖

@jaydub9191 @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks One of those is correct

@ppadjwjs @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks America has two communists parties with different speed limits. America and Europe are going to shit.

@FractalAnte @jaydub9191 @DailySoyjaks Highly unlikely

@jaydub9191 @ppadjwjs @DailySoyjaks Exactly, although I think we have a chance.

@FractalAnte @ant_dracula @DailySoyjaks It’s hilarious how incorrect you are, the parasites are the wealthy hoarding all of it and the government spending all of it in the military like the barbarian morons they are💀 maybe funnel that into your education or healthcare and you’d move up from being a third world civ.

@ppadjwjs @ant_dracula @DailySoyjaks Pretty sure the American right is not especially opposed to European socialism per se, e.g. universal medicine (as long as it is not a situation where the host population pays for parasites, which is probably a bigger problem in America).

@ant_dracula @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks Keep riding his coattails bud, don’t form your own opinions pleb💀

@FractalAnte @ppadjwjs @DailySoyjaks It's definitely a bot.

@FractalAnte @ant_dracula @DailySoyjaks It’s not illegal to think freely in Europe, it’s encouraged. We’re not the uk. You can’t even get your country to understand basic algebra, please. The real bots here are you little soyboys lmao

@ppadjwjs @ant_dracula @DailySoyjaks One problem is we don't know exactly what the Europeans think because it's illegal to talk freely in Europe. Of course we know about people like you, and can reversed engineer your opinions in our sleep (although perhaps you're a bot).

@ant_dracula @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks Pgahahahahahaha

@ppadjwjs @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks We're doing quite fine, thanks for your concern.

@Nick40156474438 @HJB_News__ Being a scummy landlord doesn’t count nick, why don’t you tell me what kind of business you run.

@ppadjwjs @HJB_News__ I am the employer RETARD ... now FUCK OFF

I couldn’t agree more 👇

@ant_dracula @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks We can tell, by how terrible your country is doing. Maybe you should.

@ppadjwjs @FractalAnte @DailySoyjaks >But this other country!! We don't care.

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ Sure man , sure.

It’s “not perfect,” that’s a huge understatement. It used discrimination to fight perceived discrimination. That’s not progress, that’s just more discrimination. Also, laws were changed in the 1960s that addressed those issues already. DEI (and CRT) was just used as an excuse to bring it back and target White people with discrimination.

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ Great way to justify yourself for sure, anyway DEI is good, it gives minorities a chance at integration, it’s not perfect but neither are like 90% of programs in America. It’s not discrimination towards white people, it’s like I just said meant to give MINORITIES a fair chance.

How about slavery? Slavery gets brought up a lot… it’s weaponized, as justification for hatred of White people. Many people (especially people on the left & Afrocentrists) make arguments that the Transatlantic Slave Trade was the worst, or it was only horrific in the West and that it wasn’t that bad in other places (like Africa or the Middle East). But is that true? 👉 Spoiler: No, that’s NOT true! Slavery existed for thousands of years, ALL ACROSS THE WORLD. Contrary to what many on the left claim, chattel slavery did, in fact, exist in Africa… and no, it wasn’t a kinder, gentler form of slavery. That is, unless you consider mass human sacrifice and cannibalism kinder and gentler. Slavery existed in Africa well before Europeans showed up, and it was African rulers who fought Europeans in order to keep it going. In the Middle East, the slave market was huge, and the male slaves brought in were often castrated (so no, that wasn’t a kinder, gentler form either). Slavery also existed in Asia, and Asia is still infamous for having sweatshops. The Vikings raided the rest of Europe and took slaves back with them. When the Viking slave owner died, the woman/women he had as slaves could be gang raped by the other men in the village, then killed to serve her owner in the afterlife. Ancient Romans enslaved other Europeans and people around the Mediterranean. In the Americas, the Natives enslaved other Natives and often also practiced human sacrifice. The point is: slavery was, and is, horrific. All over the world, it’s HORRIFIC and has been for a very, very long time. (That’s not minimizing it for one group to say that… in fact, it’s minimizing everywhere else to not recognize it was horrific all over.) How about “chattel” slavery? Here’s the thing: you can’t enslave descendants if there aren’t any. The Barbary slaves (often they were Europeans who were forced into slavery by North Africans) typically had a much shorter lifespan. Many of them died chained inside the interior of the ship, sitting in their own excrement and covered in open wounds, or they drowned chained to a sinking ship that lost a battle. There was no female companionship, no procreation, no living to an old age, no hope… There was just the incredibly harsh realities of the ship (so all they had was suffering), for the rest of their short, miserable lives. Again, in the Middle East, the majority of male slaves were CASTRATED, and because of that, they didn’t have the opportunity to reproduce, many of whom didn’t even survive being castrated. Does anyone really think that’s “better”? Also, this idea many people have that children of slaves were born free across the globe, or that slaves weren’t sold as property except in America… is absurd. When people say that in the West it was worse, or that Europeans have the most to be blamed for (which is said a lot), that isn’t intellectually honest and blatantly ignores the atrocities committed across the globe. Yes, it was horrific in the West, and guess what? It was, and is, also horrific across the globe throughout mankind’s entire history. When people blame only one group of people over everyone else, those people are, in fact, minimizing the atrocities committed everywhere else. Those people are doing precisely what they blame other people for doing (i.e., “minimizing” the atrocities of slavery, except they’re minimizing it around the entire world). So, don’t let them do that. Don’t let their cherry-picked narratives sway you from what’s really going on. Far too many people blame only one race because they HATE that one race. That’s really all this is. It’s not really about slavery, or about history, and it’s most certainly not about equality… It’s just about people today who want to try to justify their hatred of White people and justify “payback” narratives. 🤔 P.S. No other people literally FOUGHT to END SLAVERY around the world. It was EUROPEANS who did that (primarily the British).

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ You do realise it was created to give that inclusion to NON whites, it isn’t as popular in factories or grocery stores etc. actual labourers, it’s definitely prominent in white dominated industries, white collar jobs, now shut up, Jesus.

I didn’t say anything about aid, I said exclusion. You can’t say racism and discrimination is wrong and is bad… but then be racist and discriminate. Also, you seriously don’t know history as well as you think you do. Many groups we now call “White,” have also been discriminated against too. Depending on where and when, were discriminated against the most. The point is sometimes the worst treated were Black people, sometimes it was Indigenous tribes, sometimes Asians, sometimes people we now call “White”… You can’t just make a blanket claim like you did, it’s not correct.

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ It’s a FACT that coloured people were literally discriminated against for years AND clearly STILL are lmao that fair shot includes not only coloured people but also impoverished people it’s not supposed to be an aid to the day-to-day white man.

“A fair shot” isn’t excluding White people (specifically targeting heterosexual White males), which is exactly what DEI does. Next time instead of clap back with what you think you know, read what’s written and consider the possibility that you’re wrong. As far as had always had less opportunities, that’s not a universally factual statement. Who was treated the worst and had opportunities depended largely on where and when. It wasn’t always one ethnic group or race at the bottom. On top of the fact, this is a big world with a very long history, so blaming one race for all the wrongs is a ridiculous worldview.

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ No I’m just not a nutcase and know that people of colour have always had less opportunities compared to white people,doesn’t take a rocket scientist to look back a couple of centuries. There’s nothing wrong with dei, it gives people of colour a fair shot at jobs. great essay tho.

Funny how you resort to personal attacks, and obviously know much less about DEI than you think you do. Who runs BlackRock and what’s their connection to DEI? Laurence “Larry” Fink is the answer, he’s the CEO of BlackRock that is (BlackRock is a publicly traded company). What you should know about him is he’s used his firm’s enormous financial influence ($10+ trillion AUM) to aggressively push DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) policies across the West. In his 2022 annual letter, he stated that “diverse workforces are more innovative and drive better outcomes.” Also, “aggressively push” is really an understatement, BlackRock’s integration of ESG scores, including DEI metrics, into its investment decisions effectively creates a mechanism for forced compliance. But reality has undercut his claims of “better outcomes” and proven Larry Fink wrong: • 2024 McKinsey report: DEI doesn’t improve financial performance • Bloomberg (2024): Google spent $1 billion on DEI with no clear return • Meta and others have scaled back DEI after poor results In fact, The Wall Street Journal highlighted BlackRock’s use of a diversity index ETF, which underperformed (55% return vs. 70% for a global index without diversity conditions), suggesting the financial rationale for DEI-driven investing is overstated. So then, why is BlackRock still enforcing DEI through its ESG voting power? If it’s not profit-driven, the motive may very well be ideological or religious: a worldview that wants to eliminate European identity and heritage. Looking at the outcome of DEI, it’s looking a lot less like capitalism… and much more like ethnic, cultural, and societal engineering. DEI The Claim (the way they sold it): DEI aims to create more just and supportive environments for everyone, especially those who have been historically marginalized. The Reality (what it actually did): DEI changed “equality” to “equity” and openly discriminated against heterosexual white males and, at times, heterosexual Asian males (while falsely claiming it didn’t discriminate at all). How DEI Discriminated: A recent survey found that 1 in 6 hiring managers was told not to hire white males, according to a survey published by Resume Builder. Additionally, about half of all employers have openly admitted to prioritizing all other races over white males and excluding white males from even being considered. The Results: The S&P 100 added over 300,000 jobs, 94% of which went to “people of color.” - Bloomberg (Keep in mind, this is just one example of many. Also, how many of that 6% “white” were females or non-heterosexual males?). Who Benefited the Most from DEI: Social media is full of posts claiming that “white women benefited the most.” Those claims don’t hold up to the S&P 100 data cited in the results above. People make that claim because they incorrectly conflate civil rights outcomes with DEI and surveys that asked individuals if they think they were a DEI hire. That’s it… an intentional misrepresentation of data and surveys on how people felt about being a DEI hire, not on whether they actually were. In fact, HR would never tell you or document that you were a DEI hire. P.S. CRT was similar in the way it discriminated against White people.

@indiewulfe @americanus38069 It’s fine don’t answer my question, last I remember Cho Yonghee specifically said he just wanted to make her « warm and relatable » the fact y’all are obsessed about a child in a video and forcing your own ideology onto game is truly not surprising lmao!

@ppadjwjs @americanus38069 All art is political btw

So simple. lmao.

@SilveryScience @HJB_News__ Libertarian from South Africa who uses slurs while complaining about racism, the self-awareness is truly something.

@HJB_News__ The enemy calls itself, anti-racism: we have to start attacking this new form of racialism as it gets articulated, by its retarded adherents.

@Nick40156474438 @HJB_News__ Can’t wait for someone to send this to your employer 💀

@GhostSal21 @HJB_News__ You’ve probably never attended a lecture, so I highly doubt you know anything in general, but yeah sure DEI is racist, fucking idiot.

@HJB_News__ While simultaneously saying “black people cant be racist,” and dismissing actual racism from their own side entirely.

@HJB_News__ Being too dense to realise that they’re right and then posting about it on X is getting boring!

@fatiguedgroyp @DailySoyjaks Lost all credibility the moment he referred to women as « foids » 💀

@DailySoyjaks Far-right just means being normal. The more ultra-far-left foids are, the more the natural looks far-right.