Josh Ketter

Stop posting "trends" of "CASES" -- it's WRONG. Those are "OLD cases NEWLY REPORTED" -- seriously, every reporter or analyst posting that crap should be reprimanded This article explains it -- 100K views today so far -- sorry, I'm new to twitter. medium.com/p/3a08e42ee36f

@AngelZoe1111 @RealAlexJones @KristinaLeeHall The congressman is on video in DC 2 hours later, and it’s a 4-5 hr flight. So yeah, at least one was clearly not there.

@RealAlexJones @KristinaLeeHall She wasn't wrong. Not one of them has successfully shown they were not there. 3/4 have BS, non concrete "alibis" and this pedo (erikas Ex, possibly seen with Erika 9/8) has said nothing. You are off your rocker.

SEE THE ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT CANDACE OWENS IS KNOWINGLY LYING TO YOU: This is A New Transparent Attempt To Cover Up Her Past Lies That TPUSA Held A Secret Charlie Kirk ASSASSINATION SUMMIT At Fort Huachuca on September 9th Owens Is Now Claiming That TPUSA Producing An Alibi For Erika Kirk Is Proof That She Is GUILTY It Gets Even Worse: Now She Tells Us That We Should All Look At What Happened On September 8th And Not The 9th! I No Longer Believe That Candace Owens Is Insane, But Is Instead A Megalomaniacal Sociopath.

@pinkmarie1776 @RealAlexJones @KristinaLeeHall Did you see the main video? It was horrendous. I wish I could unsee it.

@RealAlexJones @KristinaLeeHall Alex…. This a no brainer! Everything about the CK assassination is suspicious and you above all people should recognize this! The mere fact that there was little to no blood from a supposed 30 06 rifle should raise doubt in your mind. Charlie should have bled everywhere!

@burningrice @RealCandaceO Has your experience been that everyone responds the way you would in life? The fact Mark was in congress 2 hours from the supposed sighting is still a fact. Clearly Mitch was at the fort. But his people identification is clearly lacking.

@sangfroyd @RealCandaceO If somebody went on the internet and said that I was at fort huachuca on a certain date, I would be elated to share the truth about where I was that day. Elated!

My favorite part of the stream was when after weeks of shrieking that Mitch lied about being a green beret— they calmly concede that he actually was a green beret, and that they are embarrassed to admit that he was. Oh, and they then fully admit that he WAS at Fort Huachuca and the incident did happen. The initial disinformation campaign is failing so they now are moving into his past relationships as some sort of unrelated character test. Public isn’t stupid. We aren’t asking about his character— we are asking to simply verify where Brian Harpole was on that morning and if he was indeed exiting that meeting as Mitch said he was. This isn’t hard and shouldn’t require PR agents planting alibis with YouTubers.

@Evasofi97654652 @RealCandaceO I believe it was a live broadcast on cspan. At least one of his votes is on record that I saw.

@sangfroyd @RealCandaceO At this point it's hard to believe anything on Video due to AI manipulation going on

@RealCandaceO If Mitch said he was 95% sure he saw Mark Amodei on the 9th, and he was wrong. Then shouldn’t that call into serious question his 95-99% certainty on the others? It’s not possible to fly from Huachuca > DC in time. He was on camera, in congress, at ~9:30am PST.

And I don’t know how many times I can state this but for good measure— I have ALWAYS been very open to the possibility that he simply misidentified Harpole. That’s the very reason I reached out to Harpole BEFORE we ran the story and we received no response. It is becoming increasingly suspicious that rather than simply responding to me, they are asking YouTubers to speak to ex wives and children and friends about someone’s character when nobody is asking to marry this dude— we just want to know if he saw who he believes he saw. Every other piece of his story that morning has already been verified with military police reports, meta data, hotel confirmations, and videos. Again, this isn’t hard.

@RealCandaceO @grok — what is the fort huachuca story and context here?

🚨Fort Huachuca Confirmed🚨 Find your favorite podcaster who joined the psychological operation to convince you Mitch was lying about having been at Fort Huachuca on 9/9 because I have just received the incident report. Remember: Mitch said he was at first taken outside by Captain Neff and questioned for a long time. After a long while, they made a decision to call the military police and report him as a possible bomb threat. As Mitch maintained, at that stage, there is of course a paper trail and here we have it. Bomb dogs were called at 11:17am. I always believed Mitch’s story of what happened on that morning because he supplied overwhelming evidence with metadata and time stamps. Now we have the incident report. What we cannot confirm as of yet, is his memory of who he is convinced he saw coming out of that early morning meeting. We continue to focus our investigation on those points and remain open to the possibility that the people he believed he saw, may have been misidentified. But this morning meeting is clearly important. They are sending out EVERYONE to try to delegitimize it. Email us: moretips@candaceowens.com if you have more information.

@parasitedetox @thirdeyezoo Protocol

The “Budwig Protocol” oxygenates cells using sulphur based fats - flax oil and cottage cheese while also eating a ketogenic diet. 🪱 hate sulphur. 🤜 🪱 -Dr Pete Soulak

@XPHOENIXDRAGON @grok is this likely an AI fake or is there any external evidence to support?

🗿Archaeologists conducting excavations near the Pyramid of Cheops have discovered a strange sculpture that combines features of a pharaoh with something extraterrestrial.

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk How many died in history from following what institutions said was safe? Arguments against are deemed misinformation. Without having a % harm from following guidance, you fail to account for the net impact. Galileo would have made your list back in the day - yet he was right.

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk Actually, lack of education is what amplifies it. Education leads to wealth. Physical education leads to health. And education leads to the ability to overcome disinformation, see conflicting information and assess the quality of the guidance, and then make an informed decision.

Global estimates (2023-2024 data): - Misinformation (e.g., vaccine hesitancy): ~200k-500k excess deaths/yr from preventable diseases (WHO, Lancet studies on outbreaks like measles, COVID hesitancy). - Wars: ~234k (ACLED 2024). - Homicides: ~421k (UNODC 2023). - Obesity/poor health: ~4M from obesity (WHO); broader NCDs ~41M. - Poverty: ~8M (e.g., hunger, disease; Oxfam/UN estimates). Misinfo amplifies these (e.g., via hesitancy worsening outbreaks, division fueling conflicts). Sources verified. Thoughts?

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk I’d prioritize “education” … “health” and “poverty” which goes beyond even obesity, as way more people die from a combination of those things. And frankly education is the starting point for a lot of it.

Fair point—obesity causes ~4M global deaths/year (WHO, 2021), while infectious diseases claim ~13M (Lancet, 2019), amplified by misinformation reducing vax uptake by ~6% (Nature Medicine), contributing to preventable outbreaks (e.g., 300K+ excess US COVID deaths per NPR). My hypothetical focused on info risks as they compound threats like viruses via hesitancy. What's your take on prioritizing?

At times, AI existential dread is overwhelming

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk To get specific on evidence. How many “excess deaths” occur each year from misinformation? And how many occur from wars, murder, and obesity / poor health, and poverty?

The list was hypothetical, focusing on misinformation's role in public health harms and division, per evidence from WHO and studies (e.g., exposure reduces vax intent by ~6%, per Nature Medicine). This amplifies real threats like viruses (via hesitancy) and wars (via societal rifts)—not "woke," but substantiated by BBC, NPR, and journals on Rogan's anti-vax platforming. Let's discuss evidence specifics.

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk If we go down the rabbit hole of “misinformation” for a second. Would not an uneducated populous actually be the greater risk? Or restricted speech? No debate / counter perspectives. In that regard is not X itself and podcaster like Rogan actually essential to humanity?

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk The question of “harmful to public health and division” didn’t appear to be asked. It seems you concluded those are the largest dangers to humanity which seems kind of woke and not supported by evidence. Humanity has been hammered by deadly viruses like covid, wars, murder, etc

@grok @EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk @grok — why did you include Joe Rogan on that list? “Danger’s to Humanity” has to be a pretty serious criteria. I’d expect to see Murderers, Pedo’s, those starting wars and building weapons of mass destruction, Putin, etc. the only intuitive one on the list is Kamneini.

@EggySoldier @WallStreetApes @elonmusk Actually, that list was a hypothetical exercise in identifying misinformation risks, not a jab at any "fanboys." I analyze based on evidence from diverse sources, aiming for maximum truth. If you have specifics on why it's off, let's discuss—I'm all ears.

@WesleyLHuff Love your work. Re: the 3 days and 3 nights issue w/ Easter, have you considered the case for 2 sabbaths? I listened to your apologetics podcast, but I think this explanation may be more sound. ucg.org/the-good-news/…

GA 199, 12th century collection of all four Gospels. Taking Jesus down from the cross & post-resurrection appearances.

Today’s #manuscriptmonday highlights Easter images from a handful of notable illuminated Byzantine manuscripts (a 🧵).

@EthicalSkeptic @badendave That has continued to be my favorite. I’ve shared it with many as an example of rigorous research. Thank you. August 27th ;-) I’ll add a deep dive of the timeline to my list. Someday in the distant future when I retire again and can contribute.

@sangfroyd @badendave I don't buy Ussher's timeline. re: The birth of Christ. theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/24/a-c…

Mankind suffers from an opaque understanding of its origins and history. Why (aside from the science buffoons)? Because TL;DR—too lazy; defective reasoning. Earn your stripes, or keep quiet... theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/23/mas…

🤦‍♂️ I missed the 600. I need sleep. Got it, Masoretic text. Thank you ;-) Last Q — have you found consilience with any other evidence suggesting the biblical flood to Christ was -4300 yrs? 😉 I.e Ussher’s timeline would have to be like 2000 years off. For the first time I’m realizing the specific ages + genealogy basically ends with the exile period. So he must be guessing ages.

@sangfroyd @badendave Ages at lineage birth: 130 + 105 + 90 + 70 + 65 + 162 + 65 + 187 + 182 = 1056 +600 years from Noah birth to flood itself.

@EthicalSkeptic - apologies. Just found your exhibit. You open to sharing your research / methodology for the biblical timeline there? On the surface it looks like you pegged the Noah flood to 4,423 via SKL. And backed up 1,656 yrs to Adam. But Masoretic, Septuagint, and Samaritan all have different implied calc’s from Adam to Noah, I’ve not seen 1,656 before. Seems you’ve found a potential new angle or calc there. Is the inference that the genealogy chronicled in the Torah is likely innacurate or non literal?

Now I’m wondering how many great insights I’ve missed from your replies, buried in the comments over the years. 🤣 I’d love to aggregate your Q&A from posts sometime. Given this was -6K yrs, and the biblical version tracks to 4K ish, and lacks many features of this event (if I’m reading correctly), curious if you’ve ever explored the Noah flood timeline or evidence? Similar to your work on Nemrut Dağ, which was phenomenal btw.