Sriram Murali (Velamur)
96.7K posts
@techieV2
Founder/CTO @beetleradar Products | Ex - Platforms @gocashfree | Ex & Now - @crispnewsin | https://t.co/7jIxDSjlJC
@endhi_peekedhi @visharjan Even Tamilnadu has some of the oldest Rama temples in India. Only these periyarists live in their own world
The real problem with this court order is not just one priest’s words. It is much bigger. Many religions, like Judaism, Christianity and Islam teach that theirs is the only true religion. This is not a rare opinion. It is the very heart of their faith. The Bible says Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” and no one reaches God except through Him. That belief is what makes the religion what it is. But the Allahabad High Court has now said: “It is wrong for any religion to claim that it is the only true religion.” The court called such a claim “disparaging” to other faiths and refused to protect the priest. Think about what this really means: The court is telling believers: “You can follow your religion… but only if you stop saying out loud what your own scriptures teach.” It is asking them to change the fundamentals of their faith just to live peacefully in India. In simple words: “We will accept your religion only if you first accept that your religion is wrong (or at least keep quiet about it).” This is not fair. The Constitution gives every Indian the right to practise and preach their religion freely. The court’s job is to protect that right and keep peace, not to decide what is “correct” belief and what is “wrong” belief. By saying “claiming only one true religion is wrong,” the court is quietly pushing a Hindu-style idea that all religions are equally true (what people call “all paths are the same”). That idea may be beautiful for some, but it is not part of Christianity or Islam. Forcing it on them is like the court rewriting their religion from the judge’s chair and enforcing polytheism on the people who follow monotheism. Courts should stop crimes that actually hurt people or create riots. They should not tell any religion, “Change your basic teachings or stay silent.” That is not protecting harmony, that is changing the faith itself. In short: You cannot protect someone’s right to follow a religion by first forcing the religion to stop being what it is. That is not justice. That is the state deciding what people are allowed to believe in public.
What was the fucking point of the Partition when India has a larger Muslim population than Pakistan?
Native American Land Loss In The USA
It is wrong for any religion to claim that it is the only true religion as it implies a disparagement of other faiths: Allahabad High Court says while denying relief to a Christian priest.
"I don’t believe in Rahu Kaala or Gulika Kaala. I eat non-vegetarian food even on festivals like Ugadi and Shivaratri, there’s nothing wrong with it" : CM Siddaramaiah while speaking in the assembly about presenting the state budget at an "auspicious time."
मैं स्वामी श्री अविमुक्तेश्वरानंद @jyotirmathah को सन २००९ से जानती हूँ और इनके नेतृत्व में बहुत वर्ष गंगा बचाओ आंदोलन में काम किया है। स्वामीश्री पर लगाए आरोप इतने फ़रेबी और झूठे हैं कि इसके बाद मोदी और योगी सरकार के लिए अंतरात्मा से केवल बद दुयाएँ निकलती हैं। स्वामीश्री जैसा निष्पाप और निडर धार्मिक गुरु हिंदू समाज को दोबारा नहीं मिलेगा . यदि आज हम इनके समर्थन में खुलकर और पुरज़ोर खड़े नहीं हो सकते, then Hindus are doomed!
I think Godi media should sit this one out.
Shoplifting (yes, even from Duane Reade) is wrong. Here's why:
