Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)

800 posts

Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)

Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)

@testnetjeff

Can't afford the audits to become mainnet Jeff.

Earth شامل ہوئے Aralık 2021
616 فالونگ437 فالوورز
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)@testnetjeff·
Oopsie doopsies
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

The real story here is worse than a fumble. It’s a three-step own goal. January 9: Anthropic locks Claude Code OAuth tokens, killing every third-party tool that built on Claude subscriptions. OpenClaw, which recommended Claude Opus 4.5 as its default model, wakes up to a broken integration. No warning. No partner outreach. January 27: Anthropic’s legal team sends the cease-and-desist over “Clawdbot” sounding too similar to “Claude.” Steinberger complies at 5 AM on a Discord call. During the 10-second window where he releases the old GitHub and X handles, crypto scammers hijack both accounts and run a $16M pump-and-dump scheme. The chaos reflects on the entire Claude ecosystem. February 15: Steinberger announces he’s joining OpenAI. So Anthropic had the fastest-growing open source project in AI history (145K+ GitHub stars, 2 million visitors in a single week), built by a guy who sold his last company for ~€100M, whose tool literally recommended Claude as the default model to millions of new users. Their response was to cut off his API access and send lawyers. Steinberger spent last week in San Francisco meeting with every major lab. He explicitly said he could have built OpenClaw into a massive company but chose OpenAI because he wanted “the fastest way to bring this to everyone.” Meanwhile OpenClaw has already spread to China, with Baidu planning direct integration into its main app. This is a project that was essentially a free distribution channel for Claude. Millions of developers installing a tool that defaults to your model. The growth marketing team at Anthropic should have been sending gift baskets, not legal notices. Sam Altman just got handed an open-source agent framework with global distribution and a brilliant founder, because Anthropic’s legal department moved faster than their partnerships team.

Nederlands
0
0
1
43
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
@DaveLevine0com Claude Cowork was released on January 14. "Programmable money" ($BTC) was $97k. Three weeks later, down 39% (to $60k). The cost of creating and maintaining software is collapsing to zero. Don't need big companies or foundations to create software anymore. Anyone can do it.
Jim Bianco tweet media
English
65
19
158
69.3K
Yano 🟪
Yano 🟪@JasonYanowitz·
Bought Bitcoin today at $67k. Three reasons: 1) Massive divergence between prices and utility 2) Crypto native sentiment extremely low 3) $68k was the 2021 high Could go lower, probably touches $60k. Save some cash. Below $50k you back up the dump truck.
English
54
21
623
64.2K
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)
Doing it the right way, the first time.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

Ethereum itself must pass the walkaway test. Ethereum is meant to be a home for trustless and trust-minimized applications, whether in finance, governance or elsewhere. It must support applications that are more like tools - the hammer that once you buy it's yours - than like services that lose all functionality once the vendor loses interest in maintaining them (or worse, gets hacked or becomes value-extractive). Even when applications do have functionality that depends on a vendor, Ethereum can help reduce those dependencies as much as possible, and protect the user as much as possible in those cases where the dependencies fail. But building such applications is not possible on a base layer which itself depends on ongoing updates from a vendor in order to continue being usable - even if that "vendor" is the all core devs process. Ethereum the blockchain must have the traits that we strive for in Ethereum's applications. Hence, Ethereum itself must pass the walkaway test. This means that Ethereum must get to a place where we _can ossify if we want to_. We do not have to stop making changes to the protocol, but we must get to a place where Ethereum's value proposition does not strictly depend on any features that are not in the protocol already. This includes the following: * Full quantum-resistance. We should resist the trap of saying "let's delay quantum-resistance until the last possible moment in the name of ekeing out more efficiencies for a while longer". Individual users have that right, but the protocol should not. Being able to say "Ethereum's protocol, as it stands today, is cryptographically safe for a hundred years" is something we should strive to get to as soon as possible, and insist on as a point of pride. * An architecture that can expand to sufficient scalability. The protocol needs to have the properties that allow it to expand to many thousands of TPS over time, most notably ZK-EVM validation and data sampling through PeerDAS. Ideally, we get to a point where further scaling is done through "parameter only" changes - and ideally _those_ changes are not BPO-style forks, but rather are made with the same validator voting mechanism we use for the gas limit. * A state architecture that can last decades. This means deciding, and implementing, whatever form of partial statelessness and state expiry will let us feel comfortable letting Ethereum run with thousands of TPS for decades, without breaking sync or hard disk or I/O requirements. It also means future-proofing the tree and storage types to work well with this long-term environment. * An account model that is general-purpose (this is "full account abstraction": move away from enshrined ECDSA for signature validation) * A gas schedule that we are confident is free of DoS vulnerabilities, both for execution and for ZK-proving * A PoS economic model that, with all we have learned over the past half decade of proof of stake in Ethereum and full decade beyond, we are confident can last and remain decentralized for decades, and supports the usefulness of ETH as trustless collateral (eg. in governance-minimized ETH-backed stablecoins) * A block building model that we are confident will resist centralization pressure and guarantee censorship resistance even in unknown future environments Ideally, we do the hard work over the next few years, to get to a point where in the future almost all future innovation can happen through client optimization, and get reflected in the protocol through parameter changes. Every year, we should tick off at least one of these boxes, and ideally multiple. Do the right thing once, based on knowledge of what is truly the right thing (and not compromise halfway fixes), and maximize Ethereum's technological and social robustness for the long term. Ethereum goes hard. This is the gwei.

English
0
0
0
25
Naksh
Naksh@Naksh005·
@VitalikButerin the concept of "city chains" for AI agents due to latency constraints is a wild mental model. hyper-localized L2s specifically for machine-to-machine commerce feels inevitable now that you frame it that way.
English
2
0
17
1.5K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Increasing bandwidth is safer than reducing latency With PeerDAS and ZKPs, we know how to scale, and potentially we can scale thousands of times compared to the status quo. The numbers become far more favorable than before (eg. see analysis here, pre and post-sharding vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/0… ). There is no law of physics that prevents combining extreme scale with decentralization. Reducing latency is not like this. We are fundamentally constrained by speed of light, and on top of that we are also constrained by: * Need to support nodes (especially attesters) in rural environments, worldwide, and in home or commercial environments outside of data centers. * Need to support censorship-resistance and anonymity for nodes (especially proposers and attesters). * The fact that running a node in a non-super-concentrated location must be not only possible, but also economically viable. If staking outside NYC drops your revenues by 10%, over time more and more people will stake in NYC. Ethereum itself must pass the walkaway test, and so we cannot build a blockchain that depends on constant social re-juggling to ensure decentralization. Economics cannot handle the entire load, but it must handle most. Now, we can decrease latency quite a bit from the present-day situation without making tradeoffs. In particular: * P2P improvements (esp erasure coding) can decrease message propagation times without requiring individual nodes to have lower bandwidth * An available chain with a smaller node count per slot (eg. 512 instead of 30,000) can remove the need for an aggregation step, allowing the entire hot path to happen in one subnet This plausibly buys us 3-6x. Hence, I think moderate latency decreases, to a 2-4s level, are very much in the realm of possibility. But Ethereum is NOT the world video game server, it is the world heartbeat. If you need to build applications that are faster than the heartbeat, they will need to have offchain components. This is a big part of why L2s will continue to have a role even in a greatly scaled Ethereum (there are other reasons too, around VM customization, and around applications that need _even more scale_). Ultimately, AI will necessitate applications that go faster than the heartbeat no matter what we do. If an AI can think 1000x faster than humans, then to the AI, the "subjective speed of light" is only 300 km/s. Hence, it can talk near-instantly within the scope of a city, but not further. As a result, there will inevitably be AI-focused applications that will need "city chains", potentially even chains localized to a single building. These will have to be L2s. And on the flipside, it would be too much of a cost to make it viable to run a staking node on Mars. Even Bitcoin does not strive for this. Ultimately, Ethereum belongs to Terra, and its L2s will serve both hyper-localized needs in its cities, and hyper-scaled needs planet-wide, and users on other worlds. Milady.
English
513
371
2.5K
588.9K
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth) ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gwart
Gwart@GwartyGwart·
>wake up >drink coffee with butter >post some shit about the k shaped economy >20 minute sauna with blood boy >post some shit about how exhausting it is to always be skating to where the puck is going >listen to pitch from guy building sex robot that looks like the girl from ex machina. Tell him you love the skeuomorphism, looks really fuckable. Tell him you’ll circle back >tell some other founders you’ll circle back >finally circle back with some founders. Tell them you’ll circle back again >peptide time >remind blood boy to inject peptides, “remember, your blood is my blood. Our blood.” >post a terrible idea and then ask “who’s building this?” >ignore all responses from people building that >compare standing desks online. Compare jetcards and fractional ownership online >podcast appearance. “companies are just staying private longer. We have a ton of portcos that could very easily exit but have decided to just stay private. Just makes more sense for them.” Nailed it. Mention k shaped economy too. >plan ayahuasca trip with the boys. Ask ChatGPT to give you 10 shamans with at least 4.5 star ratings >dinner with founder who hasn’t found PMF. “You need to pivot. It’s time to pivot. No shame in a pivot. Make it more like a casino” it’s not a gambling company, doesn’t matter. Reflexivity. Massive unlocks. k shaped economy. Pivots. >drinks with founder whose company is now making money. Act disgusted “I just think you’re trying to monetize too quick. But you’re the founder. I invest in people not companies.” Company been alive for 6 years now. >hit the 8sleep and doze off asking if you could actually be charging 3 and 30. “Jim Simons did it. Why can’t I?” >charge 2 and 20 >underperform t bills
English
87
58
1.1K
79.7K
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊@sassal0x·
If you are a "crypto data analytics company" and you are still posting metrics like monthly active addresses and daily transaction counts as if they mean anything, then you are a terrible data analytics company.
English
48
24
450
52.9K
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)
True if big
jasperthefriendlyghost.eth@drjasper_eth

This is the biggest news of the fucking year. I humbly present you 2 quotes that will radically define 2026 and bring trillions onchain, I promise nothing you read will define the next 3 years more. 1. “The No-Action Letter authorizes DTC to offer a tokenization service for DTC Participants and their clients on pre-approved blockchains for three years. Under the NAL, DTC will have the ability to tokenize real-world assets, with the digital version having all the same entitlements, investor protections and ownership rights as the asset in its traditional form. In addition, DTC will provide the same high level of resiliency, safety and soundness as that of traditional markets.  The authorization applies to a defined set of highly liquid assets, including the Russell 1000, which represents the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies by market cap, as well as ETFs tracking major indices and U.S. Treasury bills, bonds and notes. The No-Action Letter is significant because it allows DTC to launch the service once finalized, under certain limitations and representations, more quickly than would have otherwise been possible.  “ You read that right - the US Gov is not only fast tracking the move on the entire US economy onto crypt rails, they are doing it with all the benefits of existing protections. The era of global financial access at the highest levels is upon us. 2. “Under the No-Action Letter, DTC is authorized to offer a limited production environment tokenization service across L1 and L2 providers. DTCC will provide more details about on-boarding requirements, including registering wallets, as well as the approval process for L1 and L2 networks in the coming months.” Where will the world be settled? In the Ethereum ecosystem of L1s and L2s. This should not come as a shock - DTCC launched their proof of concept using the Ethereum client Besu and now they are ready to use that background to bring the entire world to Ethereum. Trillions in 2026. Ethereum.

English
1
1
2
208
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
fusaka
Indonesia
1.4K
1.3K
10.9K
713.4K
Jeff 🦇🔊 (testnetjeff.eth)
3. is a nice touch
Hayden Adams 🦄@haydenzadams

Today, I’m incredibly excited to make my first proposal to Uniswap governance on behalf of @Uniswap alongside @devinawalsh and @nkennethk This proposal turns on protocol fees and aligns incentives across the Uniswap ecosystem Uniswap has been my passion and singular focus for the past 8 years. What started as a small side project is now global financial infrastructure powering thousands of applications with ~$1.8 trillion in annual trading UNI launched in 2020, but for the past 5 years Labs has been unable to meaningfully participate in Uniswap governance, and has been greatly restricted in the ways it can build value for the Uniswap community. That ends today! This restriction was in great part due to a hostile regulatory environment that cost thousands of hours and tens of millions in legal fees. Fortunately, the regulatory environment has shifted This proposal comes from a strong desire to see the Uniswap protocol win as the global decentralized exchange for tokenized value At a high level, the proposal: 1. Turns on protocol fees and uses them to burn UNI 2. Sends @unichain sequencer fees to the UNI burn 3. Burns 100M UNI from the treasury representing the protocol fees that could have been burned if fees were turned on at token launch 4. Introduces Protocol Fee Discount Auctions, a new way to improve LP outcomes and internalize MEV to the protocol 5. Introduces "aggregator hooks” which will turns Uniswap v4 into an onchain aggregator that collects protocol fees on external liquidity sources 6. Focus Labs on driving protocol growth and adoption, including a contractual agreement to only pursue initiatives that align with Uniswap governance interests ^ As part of this, Labs will stop collecting fees on its interface, wallet, and API to supercharge distribution and adoption of the Uniswap protocol 7. Moves Foundation employees to Labs with a shared goal of accelerating protocol growth, under a growth fund from the treasury 8. Move governance-owned Unisocks liquidity to v4 on Unichain and burn the LP position I believe Uniswap protocol can be the primary place tokens are traded. This proposal sets the stage for the next decade of its growth @Uniswap will ship relentlessly over the coming years and supercharge the ecosystem of developers, LPs, and traders building on top I'm so grateful to the community that has made this all possible, and excited for what's next 🦄

English
0
0
0
36
EVMaverick392.eth
EVMaverick392.eth@EVMaverick392·
proud to present "EVMavericks trailer" sound on!
English
17
19
68
2.9K