Fanny Graham

Every single time Owen Jones posts something about me, I get messages like this for days after. The worst abuse I suffer isn’t from the far right. It comes in the wretched wake of the left.

.@KTHopkins quite rightly says that @sharrond62 is owed an apology after the IOC kicked men out of women’s events at the Olympics. Hear, hear Katie - Sharron has been an incredible ambassador for female sports women while others looked away when it mattered most!!

@FiLiA_charity @UKTogetherAll Re the extensive sexual brutality visited by your 'freedom fighters' on women & young girls on 7/10:- Mirit Ben Mayor, a police chief SI, said she believed that the brutality against women was a combination of two ferocious forces, “the hatred for Jews and the hatred for women.”

We are at the HUGE @UKTogetherAll march with our gorgeous banner. We are proud to be anti-racist & anti-fascist #feminists; we are not free until ALL our Sisters are free! ⛔️No to racism ⛔️No to the far right ♀️Yes to #sisterhood & #solidarity #Together #FeministsAgainstRacism

@FiLiA_charity @UKTogetherAll As you implode, never forget this FiLiA Women built you, men will destroy you You deserve nothing less for supporting a far left omnicause all of which would oppress, rape & murder you in a heartbeat Women will fight on for our rights without you

@jo_bartosch @Boo1956 Me too. Do Steve Coogan and his luvvie friends know who are they are marching with? telegraph.co.uk/gift/9ee2c582e…

I've had a look at some of the orgs on this march. I don't do guilt by association, but even I'd feel a bit squeamish about marching alongside the Islamic Human Rights Commission (look them up...), LGBTYS, the Peter Tatchell Foundation, NION & TransActual Feeling rather relieved that FiLiA withdrew my panel invite last year.

Next up, Filia to announce: "if you see a terf, punch em in the fucking face"

@gotrice2024 Maybe he was annoyed because he's working minimum wage to take shit from assholes pointing cameras in his face

This gentleman went to get a quick bite to eat, he ordered his sandwich the way he wanted it and when the employee rung him up, he tried to give the cash. The employee became annoyed and told him that due to a system problem, they couldn’t take cash and told him he would be throwing his sandwich away. The gentleman even said that since it was an issue on their end could he just get the sandwich for free since it’s not his fault they couldn’t accept cash and the employee became even more annoyed and said no. I have a feeling the employee was annoyed because he knew it was his fault he didn’t let the customer know beforehand what was going on, shouldn’t the employee just let him have the sandwich though?

Between 1997 and 2016, approximately 1 in every 2,200 Muslim males over the age of 16 in Britain were arrested for what are euphemistically referred to as ‘group localised child sexual exploitation offences (GLCSO)’, which is to say, the grooming, gang-rape, torture and trafficking of White British children. For specifically Pakistani men, the arrest rates rose to 1 in 1,700. In specific towns the percentages are far worse. In Rochdale, 1 in 280 Muslim males have been convicted of child sexual offences. In Telford, where up to 1,000 girls were groomed, raped and trafficked for 40 years going back to the 1980s, it’s 1 in 126. And in Rotherham, where over 1,500 girls suffered the same abuse, a barely believable 1 in 16 of the town’s 2,529 Pakistani Muslim males over the age of 15 in 2011, 160 men, were arrested for child sexual offences. Of the 317 men convicted of GLCSO between 1997 and 2018, 275 of them, 87 percent, had Muslim names. Within these Pakistani Muslim communities, the subjugation and abuse of women is not regarded as extreme behaviour but as the norm; and the authority of community elders — through which British police continue to liaise with these Muslim ghettos — ensures that the silence under which this industrial-scale abuse of our children is perpetrated is never broken: not by the wives and mothers of the rapists; not by their friends and families; not by their imams, muftis and mosques; and, increasingly, not by the British institutions these communities infiltrated and, today, dominate. This silence is created by the Pakistani clan system, which is composed of brothers, cousins, uncles and family friends, over which imams have absolute and religiously sanctioned control. Again and again, trial reports on the Pakistani rape gangs that have been arrested show that the criminals were members of the same family, nuclear or extended. This alone demonstrates that the rapists are not isolated gangs of men who just happened to be Muslims and Pakistanis, but are part of an organised crime network of drug-dealers, groomers and traffickers bound by religion and controlled by highly organised, hierarchically-structured, kinship-based networks (biraderi) that run throughout the Pakistani communities in Britain. Few if any members of those communities, therefore, can be ignorant of the existence of the rape-gang network. This includes the Pakistani Muslim Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who has repeatedly denied the existence of police reports of Muslim rape gangs operating across London; the Pakistani Muslim Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood; the UK’s 26 Muslims MPs, 19 Muslim Peers and more than 500 Muslim councillors; the more than 2,000 imams in the UK’s 2,300-plus mosques, the unknown numbers of muftis presiding over the 85 known Sharia courts, and the thousands of Muslim academics in our educational sector indoctrinating our children into the dogma of Islam. It is, therefore, in my opinion impossible to believe what we are told and expected to believe, that hundreds and perhaps thousands of Pakistani Muslims in these towns knew nothing about these appalling crimes and who was perpetrating them. And these are only three of the 50 towns and cities and 85 local authorities in which we know, already, that Muslim grooming and rape gangs operate. In some cases, members of these Muslim ghettos did come forward, and they were ignored by the police, threatened by the rape gangs and hounded from their communities. But they are a tiny minority. Most Muslims, by far, justify the rapes as the fault of the victims, which Islam, the Qur’an and UK imams all tell them are the sex slaves of Islamic conquest religiously sanctioned by Allah. However many men were actually involved in the rape of hundreds of thousands of English and no doubt Scottish, Welsh and Irish girls too, it is the whole Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim diaspora in Britain that stands accused of complicity in the silence under which these crimes were committed and continue to be committed today. All who did, therefore — all who are complicit — are accessories after the fact for knowingly assisting these criminals in avoiding arrest, trial and punishment for their appalling crimes, which continue to this day, at this very hour, the length and breath of Britain. This is something we, the British people, should take into consideration when proposing solutions to the presence in Britain of such a large and hostile population of rapists and their accomplices. Extract from my new book, ‘The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain’. If you don’t want to see Britain swamped with millions of Muslim men and their huge families living off the taxes of the British people while raping our women and children, and want to know what we can do to oppose the barbarisms of Islam, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. Link below. architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2026/02/26/the…

Matthew Wright proves our point on LBC this morning. The official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — is already silencing legitimate debate and criticism of Islam and its practices. It amounts to a de facto Muslim blasphemy law. The treatment of Nick Timothy by Labour MPs is deeply sinister. The Shadow Justice Secretary criticised mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square, was reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded “Islamophobic”, and faced calls to resign from Labour MPs and even the Prime Minister. This morning, FSU External Affairs Officer @_ConnieShaw was invited on to discuss the comments made by Nick Timothy. Matthew Wright didn’t want to hear it. After the interview, he told another guest he had “closed her down” because she was “putting out anti-Muslim hatred”. Farcical. In a crowded field, Matthew is this week’s runner up as for chief enforcer of the blasphemy law this week. 👏

Note the sheer terror and panic in Matthew’s behaviour. His sleight of hand, misdirection, slanders and personal attacks had every hallmark of an institution trying to shut down a whistleblower And that is the problem There is a whole class of cultural gatekeepers who have been groomed to protect the institution of Islam and Islamism from sunlight being shone on its malevolent content and intentions This is absolutely Muslim Brotherhood strategy and their goal is - quite openly - to take over the world From conflating Islam with race to pushing the mantra that Islam is a religion of peace - these are acts of camouflage to conceal Islamism’s malevolent intent and to turn useful idiots like Matthew into guardians of theocracy and totalitarianism whilst falsely believing they are agents of virtue Matthew also suffers from deep cultural bias He has been shaped by a Disneyfied West that mistakenly taught us that deep down we’re all the same and that we all want to hold hands and get along But this is never the case with totalitarian, revolutionary movements - from Nazism to communism to Islamism Matthew lacks the empathy to conceptualise that different cultures see the world differently to him Not all religions are the same They have specific ideas, personalities, myths and history that are very different - and these differences lead to different goals, intentions, outcomes and behaviour It is a form of cultural imperialism and racism when Matthew projects his world view onto muslims and doesn’t listen to what they actually say in their own words But more than that, it is an act of cultural suicide that would have us all pushed off the cliff with him It is imperative that people continue to fight for their right to speak openly - and in whatever tone of their choosing - about the set of medieval ideas that go under the name of Islam

Imagine if nearly everyone you knew and most of our media outlets and so many celebrities suddenly started coming to the defence of Jimmy Savile. It becomes a movement, to suggest that Savile's victims are "the terrifying thing". That's how 'Free Palestine' feels to normal people

Having been told the definition of 'Islamophobia' or 'anti-muslim-hatred' would not be used to stop people critiquing Islam, Keir Starmer promptly called for Nick Timothy to be fired after he critiqued Islam.

More despicable stuff from the woman who couldn’t bear to be a lesbian. @ProfStephenW knows perfectly well that the concerns about teenage girls being drawn into the trans medicalization vortex are valid. She told me herself in a conversation five years ago. She admitted then that she had to be careful what she said because of possible reactions from young trans activists. I agreed at the time to keep this conversation private. Her disgusting attack on Keira is so hypocritical I no longer feel bound by my commitment.

We often hear it’s perfectly possible to support “LGBTQ” rights. Those letters all belong together, they say. It’s all about mutual solidarity. In fact, the entire “LGBTQ+” movement is based on this supposed “solidarity.” It makes no sense. Those who take this position really haven’t thought it through. Is it laziness? Cowardice? Lack of interest? All three? Let me explain why supporting LGB rights and supporting what are known as “trans rights” are mutually exclusive. * If you support the rights of lesbians, you will agree they have the right to have their own dating sites. And certainly to describe themselves there as only looking for sexual partners who are (biologically) female. Because that’s what lesbian means. * If you support the rights of gay men, you will agree they have the right to have saunas exclusively for men. And not to have to admit women who “identify” as men. * If you on the other hand support what are known (falsely, in my view) as “trans rights”, you will think a “trans woman” has a perfect right to go to a lesbian dating site and hit on a young lesbian looking for her first girlfriend. And to call her “transphobic” for not being interested. And you will think it’s absolutely fine for a “trans man” to go to a gay men’s sauna and try to get some action and call men who mind that she doesn’t have a penis “transphobic.” It’s one or the other. Either you support gay and lesbian rights or you support people being entitled to enter spaces intended for the opposite sex because of their “gender identity.” You can say you support “trans rights” if you want. It means you support unreasonable demands that disrespect other people’s boundaries and are contemptuous of other people’s rights.

From top to bottom, probably the most profoundly misguided, predictably counterproductive piece of quasi-legislative guff you are ever likely to come across, full of inherent contradictions for anyone who wants to be able to criticise Islam as zealously as they should be entitled to do so without having a chilling effect on their freedom of expression and speech. And boy, do we need to be able to robustly criticise Islam and self-professed Muslim politicians more than ever before, now provided with a completely bogus shield to use against scrutiny & accountability. gov.uk/guidance/a-def…

I hope the PM reads this. Life long Labour Party member and experienced criminal brief here resigning his membership of the Labour Party on principle over the attack on the right to jury he rightly labels “constitutional vandalism”

“We’re fighting to keep men in our women only spaces” says lunatic overpaid grifting feminist before getting alarmed and distressed. Nottingham Women’s Centre.

My removal from the international women’s day event by the police. I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions. I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.

Here's the piece. open.substack.com/pub/grahamline…