ashutosh sharma

@JioCare @reliancejio I am getting call from Gurgaon @police_haryana @gurgaonpolice regarding my erstwhile number which was already closed and disconnected from company and same has been communicated over email , but

@ajeetbharti "your 6 can be mine 9"

सवाल 2+3 का नहीं है, सवाल है कि सवाल डिसाइड कौन कर रहा है। यदि ब्राह्मण कर रहा है तो उत्तर में वो 5 देखना चाहेगा, जबकि यदि अमिताभ बच्चन की बात करें तो वो 2 और 2 को भी पाँच बना देते हैं। मेरिट तो वो है जो दो और दो को पाँच बना दें।

Seeking Solutions for Technological Challenges The Indian Army had released the Compendium of Technological Challenges (#CTC 2025) on 23 September 2025, outlining 41 futuristic challenges across domains such as Unmanned Systems, AI, Quantum Technologies and Directed Energy Weapons. The index of the compendium is available on the Army Design Bureau (ADB) webpage. Interested agencies may request detailed information by emailing CPOS.1234@GOV.IN to obtain the relevant sections of the compendium. The last date to request details is 20 April 2026, and solutions may be submitted by 31 May 2026. Further updates are available on the ADB webpage.

My latest sand art creation of a sacred #GauMata at Puri Beach, Odisha. A tribute to the symbol of compassion, nourishment, and Indian culture. 🙏

Iran War की मुख्य वजह नशा है! तीन ताल के लेटेस्ट एपिसोड में सुनिए-देखिए चप्पल के मोक्ष, मौत के रिवर्स गियर और अनलिमिटेड टॉपर वाली UPSC पर बतकही @kamleshksingh ताऊ, @007asifkhan ख़ांचा और @kuldeepmishra सरदार के साथ. Full Ep: youtu.be/hVeakAxK1Tw #aajtakradio #aajtakpodcast #TTStaff #teentaal #Comedypodcast #IranWar #iranUS #Netanyahu

यह प्रश्न उत्तर प्रदेश पुलिस की परीक्षा का है। सोचिए, कहां-कहां ज़हर फैला हुआ है #पंडित #ब्राह्मण

youtu.be/xNygmjasbAs?si… “Governments do not know how to handle prosperity”- @TVMohandasPai Thanks @VishalBhargava5 for amazing podcast Must watch for all Bangaloreans , Mr Pai to the point and direct as always 😅

Scenes from BSNL Prayagraj office.

Galgotias University एक बार फिर चर्चा में है। रिसर्च और इनोवेशन के नाम पर खूब पैसा बना रहे है। भारत सरकार पेटेंट फाइल करने के लिए पाँच लाख रुपये तक की प्रोत्साहन राशि देती है। पेटेंट फाइलिंग की प्रक्रिया और इसके खेल को समझने के लिए टॉप पेटेंट फाइल करने वाले भारतीय संस्थानों की सूची देखें। सभी Indian Institutes of Technology (आईआईटी) मिलकर केवल 803 पेटेंट फाइल करते हैं, जबकि Lovely Professional University, Jain Deemed-to-be University, Galgotias University और Teerthanker Mahaveer University जैसे संस्थानों ने एक हज़ार से अधिक पेटेंट फाइल किए हैं। बेसिक अंतरराष्ट्रीय पेटेंट फाइलिंग फीस $285–400 होती है। केवल पेटेंट फाइलिंग के जरिए ये संस्थान हर साल लगभग पचास करोड़ रुपये से अधिक कमा रहे हैं। हालांकि, ये यूनिवर्सिटी पेटेंट फाइल करती हैं लेकिन उन्हें आगे प्रोसीक्यूट नहीं करतीं, और अधिकांश पेटेंट अंततः ग्रांट नहीं होते। इसका मतलब है कि फाइलिंग की संख्या तो बढ़ती है, लेकिन वास्तविक नवाचार या पेटेंट की मान्यता हासिल नहीं होती।

@cryptocomcs this is resolved now

@tweetashutosh Hello Ashutosh. Our team would be glad to look into the experienced difficulties and offer assistance. To do so, please reach out to us via DM at @cryptocomcs or via live chat. Thank you!

hey @cryptocom I am trying to verify my identity in order to open account but its failing from last several weeks , not sure what could i have done better, have tried my best please help its really frustrating for me. CC:@kris

@brahma_4u Yes its real , they reached out to me

Missed being 30u30 entrepreneur by 30k INR ;)

#sholayhills #drone

🚨 AIR FORCE CHIEF : "India plus China controlled 60% of world’s GDP at one time, but that didn’t stop us from getting captured and colonised" "If you don’t have robust Military, you can be subjugated by anybody" "Venezuela and Iraq show that military strength alone is not enough" "What matters is the will to use it. Restraint backed by strength is respected as capability"

दावोस में कनाडा के पीएम मार्क कार्नी के इस स्पीच की ज़बरदस्त चर्चा है…इन्होंने साफ तौर पर वो कह दिया है जो दुनिया भर के नेता कहने से बच रहे हैं - stop "living within the lie" of the rules-based order … पूरी स्पीच सुनिए

A jihadi attack is underway against Kurigram’s District Commissioner, Annapurna Debnath. Who will provide her security? Who will punish the jihadis? The country’s Hindu-hating government is playing the flute in silence. The jihadists shout the moment they see a Hindu—“Indian agent,” “Awami League agent,” “ISKCON agent.” Hearing these shouts, mob terrorists rush in to beat and burn Hindus, pocketing their so-called free ticket to heaven.

India isn't on the list because Indian immigrants in the US have one of the lowest welfare usage rates among all groups, often below 25%—likely under the chart's inclusion threshold. They tend to have high incomes (median over $151K) and education levels, leading to greater self-sufficiency. Data from Trump's post highlights higher-rate countries.

Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while. For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt. The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale. Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general. This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less. We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal. Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”). And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility. Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income. And then what happens? The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated. The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door. Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.

2026

Happy new year

@kamleshksingh ताऊ आप हिंदी मैं लिखोगे तो और मजा आयेगा 🤣

PROPER 🦏 Dhurandhar is technically good cinema, but it is also pure, unadulterated, and unacceptable propaganda. You don't need to see the full 3.4-hour film to conclude that. I haven't. Now you have to hear me out before you go out to watch this piece of gratuitous gore wrapped in a spy thriller cover. Aditya Dhar is an insidious bigot, proven by his deliberate choice to show Pakistan in a poor light. He could have chosen Mauritius, which has beaches where the lady spy could prance in a bikini. But no, he chose the lovely Lyari in Karachi. Do we not have kachchi aabadi in India? My bigotry of low expectations is so profound that I patronisingly conflate 25 crore Indian Muslims with Pakistan, and by extension, Islam, and therefore, I cannot endorse this 'Islamophobia.' ​I must offer my disservice now by preemptively attributing motives to Dhar and questioning the existence of any cinema, however well-made, that my indoctrinated intellect can't easily process. I haven't seen the film, and I hope I don't like it when I do. My review will follow, but for now, know this: This is not my India. This is not my Bollywood. ​Dear YRF, only your spy universe can salvage what is left of our nice little insulated universe. Please show an Indian spy making love with a terrorist-spy who has vowed a thousand cuts on India. Make love, not war. Peace and out. ♥️☮️♥️ I expect all like-minded global citizens to believe me and support me as I raise the heat in a already hot and fractured society. I will not allow Aditya Dhar to damage the fabric the threads of which I have been pulling so carefully as I pull the wool over your eyes. Wait for my review where I will condemn the chutzpah of Dhar and pan his big outing after watching the film. Also, Yami shouldn't have married this man. She is a bigot too. Deepika shouldn't have married the nutcase who looks brilliant as the protagonist. She is a bigot too. Compromised by JP Nadda with a brand ambassador role. Also, anybody who watches this film is a bigot. Except the critic with a conscience, like me. Rating: Dhurandhar gets 0 stars. It's an assault on our collective lack of conscience.