jm

1.7K posts

jm banner
jm

jm

@untappedJM

trading cards. dad. finance. banking. tech. magic the gathering. pokémon.

شامل ہوئے Ocak 2022
193 فالونگ1.1K فالوورز
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@scruffycitytv Hey man! Leave some MTG for the rest of us!
English
1
0
0
19
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@scruffycitytv I actually need that Charmander for my set — if you’re selling
jm tweet media
English
1
0
0
538
Scruffy
Scruffy@scruffycitytv·
@untappedJM Oh I didn’t either lol I posted a few pics.
English
1
0
2
3.4K
Scruffy
Scruffy@scruffycitytv·
I bought a random $15 collection off eBay. Think anything good is in here?
Scruffy tweet media
English
14
0
171
50.1K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
Ok, please be the SUV / Minivan mashup of my dreams. Exterior look and higher ride of the SUV with the sliding doors and interior comforts of the minivan. Kia Carnival is the closest I’ve seen so far.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@LeahLibresco Something way cooler than a minivan is coming

English
2
0
2
245
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@gospaceport @sysadafterdark “This update to the Covered List does not prohibit the import, sale, or use of any existing device models the FCC previously authorized.” Looks like it’s just for new router models.
English
0
0
1
97
Scruffy
Scruffy@scruffycitytv·
Let’s see your most recent purchases! Here is mine.
Scruffy tweet media
English
4
0
3
11.1K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@gospaceport Getting new racks? Or shutting down the data center??
English
2
1
3
492
Digital Spaceport
Digital Spaceport@gospaceport·
If you are in the Austin area and want 1-3 42U racks HMU in comments. Free!
Digital Spaceport tweet media
English
8
1
19
1K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@eigenrobot You must be new here.
English
0
0
1
20
eigenrobot
eigenrobot@eigenrobot·
magic the gathering has scalpers now. make of that what you will
eigenrobot tweet mediaeigenrobot tweet media
English
46
0
118
21.3K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@scruffycitytv @carbos I’ve migrated to Card Saver 1s for most things over toploader + teambag
English
0
0
0
77
Scruffy
Scruffy@scruffycitytv·
@carbos I don’t really blame the dude. Some tcgplayer sellers are straight garbage. Dudes will drop a $1 card with no sleeve or top loader in a pwe and ship it. I’m not going to team bag low end but still a sleeve/top loader lol
English
1
0
2
104
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@buccocapital …and the increase in shareholder lawsuits. The lawyers will love this!
English
0
0
0
50
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@BourbonInvestm2 Is that guy a big deal in the sports world? I don’t understand why everyone got all riled up over his overhype for this “earth shattering” news.
English
1
0
0
118
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@gospaceport probably... or some 3rd party integration that accessed. I agree its tough. But its possible to get there.
English
2
0
0
18
Digital Spaceport
Digital Spaceport@gospaceport·
@untappedJM I went over a yr last attemptp and it was still there. Maybe some setting I have ticked dunno.
English
1
0
0
22
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@BreakerCulture @ShotimeSports Honestly — LinkedIn crowd would love your posts. You should absolutely do it. (This is not a dig)
English
1
0
1
23
TY WILSON
TY WILSON@BreakerCulture·
@ShotimeSports Ha! I should totally post on LinkedIn as well. ;-)
English
1
0
2
325
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@scruffycitytv Opening sports feels worse than opening Pokemon, which already feels like lighting money on fire.
English
1
0
0
52
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@BenMBurrows You were citing “value tied up”. And I agreed with you for transferable digital assets. Then you gave examples like Fortnite skins. There is no “value tied up” in Fortnite skins. There is money spent… as they are not transferable.
English
1
0
0
56
Ben Burrows
Ben Burrows@BenMBurrows·
Something I think "traditional" collectors completely miss with digital is what is actually considered collectible by each generation. I've almost exclusively seen "digital" used to describe platforms like Panini Blockchain, NBA Top Shot and other NFT projects. I don't think that comes even close to capturing what is being "collected" by younger generations and mostly limits the scope to a digital asset of something we typically associate with something physical (art, cards). Why has the community completely ignored categories like collectible cosmetics in video games? Ignoring these types of collectibles — and they are absolutely viewed as such by their owners — dismisses markets that have proven to be worth billions. Franchises such as Counter-Strike, Fortnite, Call of Duty, League of Legends and many, many more have become so profitable because of how robust the digital collectible market is for their cosmetics and even items that provide in-game utility. If we limit the scope to items like trading cards, yes, younger collectors are more than likely going to have largely physical collections. But if we ask the youngest generations about -all- of their collectibles, I think you'll find much more value tied up into Roblox and Minecraft accounts than you might have guessed. The younger generation is collecting a -massive- amount of digital assets, they just don't look like what many "traditional" collectors expected.
Darren Rovell@darrenrovell

We just did the most massive study in collectibles for a Fortune 500 company. The youth collector, who spends all day on his or her phone, has a collection that is at least 95% physical. The NFT boom and bust did collosal damage to the hope of digital collecting.

English
19
11
65
9.5K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@C14RK0 @Boggememes Nah… on another post he said he wasn’t aware it was commander only until after he made the thread. He doesn’t want any common / uncommon to be worth this much. He gave Stock Up as another example.
English
0
0
0
11
C14rk0
C14rk0@C14RK0·
@XCHcentral_jm @Boggememes The problem is that it's a common, but not a real common due to it not existing in any normal packs. So you get powerful cards at what is supposed to be a cheap rarity stuck with a high price due to the shitty printing policies effectively making them more rare
English
1
0
0
14
Kyle Boggemes
Kyle Boggemes@Boggememes·
Every time I see a common or uncommon priced like this, it's a failure of distribution. There needs to be more ways than opening packs to get cards.
Kyle Boggemes tweet media
English
47
9
322
128.5K
jm
jm@untappedJM·
@netcapgirl mentioning VLookup in 2026
jm tweet media
English
0
0
1
62
sophie
sophie@netcapgirl·
we will build AGI, colonize mars, solve longevity and we’ll still be using excel
andrew chen@andrewchen

prediction re the end of spreadsheets AI code gen means that anything that is currently modeled as a spreadsheet is better modeled in code. You get all the advantages of software - libraries, open source, AI, all the complexity and expressiveness. think about what spreadsheets actually are: they're business logic that's trapped in a grid. Pricing models, financial forecasts, inventory trackers, marketing attribution - these are all fundamentally *programs* that we've been writing in the worst possible IDE. No version control, no testing, no modularity. Just a fragile web of cell references that breaks when someone inserts a row. The only reason spreadsheets won is that the barrier to writing real software was too high. A finance analyst could learn =VLOOKUP in an afternoon but couldn't learn Python in a month. AI code gen flips that equation completely. Now the same analyst describes what they want in plain English, and gets a real application - with a database, a UI, error handling, the works. The marginal effort to go from "spreadsheet" to "software" just collapsed to near zero. this is a massive unlock. There are ~1 billion spreadsheet users worldwide. Most of them are building janky software without realizing it. When even 10% of those use cases migrate to actual code, you get an explosion of new micro-applications that look nothing like traditional software. Internal tools that used to live in a shared Google Sheet now become real products. The "shadow IT" spreadsheet that runs half the company's operations finally gets proper infrastructure. The interesting second-order effect: the spreadsheet was the great equalizer that let non-technical people build things. AI code gen is the *next* great equalizer, but the ceiling is 100x higher. We're about to see what happens when a billion knowledge workers can build real software.

English
28
29
819
40.1K