WP Consulting

@ARS38171688: [1/2] 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴 11:1–2: “𝘏𝘢𝘴 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘏𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦? 𝘉𝘺 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴.” 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘶𝐭𝘵𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘑𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘢𝘩 31:31–33 [𝐭𝘩𝘦] “𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵” You seem to enjoy talking about things you neither know or understand. Perhaps the following will explain some of what things you clearly do not understand. In Romans 11, the apostle Paul compares Abraham’s seed to the branches of an olive tree. (Rom. 11:21) This tree represents the fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant. The root of the tree is holy and represents God, who gives life to the tree's branches, the Israel of God. (Rom. 11:16) The trunk represents Jesus, the primary part of Abraham’s offspring/seed, and the branches that includes the remnant represent “the fullness” of those included in the secondary part of this seed. (Isa. 10:20; Rom. 11:12)⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ The natural Jews that rejected Jesus are the branches that were “broken off" the olive tree (Rom. 11:17), which means that they lost the opportunity to become part of Abraham’s seed. But who would replace those branches? John the Baptist said something very interesting: "Do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham." (Luke 3:8)⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ Branches from a wild olive tree were grafted onto the olive tree to replace the branches that have been broken off. (Rom. 11:17-18) IOW Gentile Christians would be grafted into the olive tree and so they join the Christian Jewish remnant as the secondary part of Abraham’s seed. God broke off the natural branches, which opened the way to these wild olive branches to become spiritual Jews, and their praise comes from God. (Rom. 2:28-29)⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ The "Israel of God" (Gal.6:16) are the Christians that became the 'children of the promise that are counted by God as Abraham's seed.' The Israel of God is "a royal priesthood, a holy nation," and they are now "God's people" that "have received mercy." (1 Pet. 2:9-10)⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ The natural Jews still have the opportunity to become part of the Abraham's seed, for if they "do not continue in their unbelief, … the natural branches [will] be grafted back into their own olive tree" by God. (Rom. 11:23-24)⁣ God has rendered judgment and he has chosen those who he will count as Abraham's seed, "the Israel of God," and how inscrutable are his ways! Indeed, "𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞." (Rom. 11:29, 33; Gal. 6:16)⁣ ⁣⁣ As Rom. 5:10 says, “For if while we were enemies [of the gospel] we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.” Rom. 11:28 says, “As regards the gospel, [the natural Jews] are enemies for your sake. But as regards election, [the Jewish remnant] are beloved for the sake of their forefathers.” (Rom. 11:28)⁣⁣⁣⁣ Again, I said nothing about the replacement of 𝐚𝐧𝐲 religious system. The old Law Covenant is no longer in effect. When the nation of Israel broke the Law of Moses in 607 BC, God foretold through the prophet Jeremiah that that old covenant would be superseded by the 𝐧𝐞𝐰 covenant. ⁣ [cont’d]

@YahwehGraced: [1/5] 𝘌𝘭𝘰𝘩𝘪𝘮’𝘴 (𝘎𝘰𝘥𝘴’) 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴. You are mistaken; Israel is no longer God’s chosen people. With reference to the Jews at Matt. 23:38, Jesus stated: “Your house is left to you desolate.” In fact,God entered into a covenant with the patriarch Abraham promising to bless and multiply his offspring because of Abraham’s faith. This promise is called the “Abrahamic Covenant.” 𝐆𝐞𝐧. 𝟐𝟐:𝟏𝟕-𝟏𝟖: 𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐞 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝, 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐲 𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞. With respect to the Abrahamic Covenant, some 400 years later, God told the descendants of Abraham through Moses that they had been chosen to be his people based on “the oath that he swore to [their] fathers,” Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. 𝐃𝐞𝐮𝐭. 𝟕:𝟔-𝟖: “𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐝. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮, 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐚𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲, 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐨𝐡 𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐠𝐲𝐩𝐭. God warned Abraham’s descendants, the nation of Israel, that if they should failto obey God’s commandments that they would no longer receive blessings and would be overtaken by many curses. 𝐃𝐞𝐮𝐭. 𝟐𝟖:𝟏𝟓-𝟏𝟔: 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮. 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝. God specifically warned Israel that Rome would destroy them as a nation. God told them in 1473 BC—some 1,542 years in advance—that they would be cursed and abandoned as a nation, and would suffer besiegement. This prophecy was fulfilled in 70 AD. [cont’d]

@OneDangWolfPack @Biblicalman 😌✍️ Those who despise me, the Lord God, will only face a great flood and an unquenchable fire. （there is one thing you must not forget:Jehovah sees a day as a thousand years,and a thousand years as a day.）🫵

[1/2] @Zephyrgold58: 𝘌𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦’𝘴 𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘧, 𝘭𝘦𝘵'𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺..... @CricketSurfing: 𝘌𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘐𝘵 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘴𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘭. To what “observed principles of nature” do you refer? What does the fossil record or comparative anatomy prove about evolution? You say survival and replication to be “a primary driving factor … [as to] why and how species evolve over time.” You say that the reason species evolve over time is because of the survival of what in nature and the replication of what in nature? Now @CricketSurfing describes evolution as “a well established theory based on evidence,” which is defined generally as allele [gene] frequencies that changes over time by natural selection driven by common descent with modification. It is said that it is by means of such changes in these allele frequencies in a population over time that new species emerge. However, no one has 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 observed natural selection cause one species to evolve into another species. However, evolution doesn’t happen in individuals nor does it occur across populations either. For example, no one has EVER observed evidence of a whale transitioning into a hippopotamus across populations. As a scientist, I have a problem with your statement that the ToE is “based on evidence” since no one has ever observed such occurring. 𝐍𝐎 𝐎𝐍𝐄. @Zephyrgold58 makes mention of random mutations based on “observed principles of nature” in his post, and yet while botanist Hugo de Vries has explained the arrival of small, inheritable changes in life forms by mutations, science has discovered that these rare mutations are harmful, not helpful, and that they could possibly account for a degeneration or deterioration, a devolution 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝, but not an evolution 𝐮𝐩𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝. Once @Zephyrgold58 has told me what “principles of nature” have been 𝐨𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝, I can explain how everything in the universe will decay into simpler and simpler states until what is termed "thermodynamic equilibrium" is finally reached.⁣⁣ In physics, entropy is the measure of the disorder of a system. A system’s entropy increases as it moves from an ordered, organized, and planned state towards a more disordered, dispersed, and unplanned one. The more disorder there is in a system, the higher its entropy is.⁣⁣⁣ I would also explain how the ToE ignores this fundamental law of physics and totally contradicts the second law of thermodynamics, and says that disordered, dispersed, and lifeless atoms and molecules spontaneously came together over time, in a particular order, to form extremely complex molecules such as proteins, DNA, and RNA, whereupon millions of different living species with even more complex structures gradually emerged.⁣⁣⁣ As a scientist, I cannot ignore the second law, which debunks the ToE. [cont’d]