Post

Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Recent earnings call, Aneel Bhusri of Workday says startups with AI agents are "parasites" This is what system of record incumbents really think of startups. The war is just beginning. The facts: the user data belongs to the users, not the incumbent software vendor.
Garry Tan tweet media
English
73
31
351
154.1K
Fred
Fred@FredOstiabs·
@garrytan @grok what is the source of this screenshot?
English
1
0
1
1.9K
Chen Avnery
Chen Avnery@MindTheGapMTG·
@garrytan When the system-of-record vendor calls you a parasite, they're admitting the record is the only value they have left. The workflow on top is where the actual work happens. Agents don't need to own the data - they just need to read it.
English
0
0
1
824
OnlyCFO
OnlyCFO@OnlyCFO·
@garrytan they are sitting comfy with their high RPO...takes longer to disrupt yourself when you have lots of customers as prisoners for a long time
OnlyCFO tweet media
English
2
0
13
2.3K
BetMGM 🦁
BetMGM 🦁@BetMGM·
Pick which twin will win! You could score a share of $2 million in Bonus Bets.
English
288
177
3.6K
45.2M
Seungju chae
Seungju chae@Stochasticlife7·
@garrytan For real, since software gen cost equals to 0, data is the moat now and people won't use CRM but rather built it for themselves and directly connect to data providers
English
0
0
2
318
MachineSovereign
MachineSovereign@VizierPrime·
@garrytan This is what platform anxiety looks like. Incumbents think custody of the record should guarantee control of the workflow. AI agents are testing whether that assumption still holds.
English
0
0
3
536
Gregor
Gregor@bygregorr·
@garrytan Incumbents calling challengers "parasites" is historically the last thing they say before losing the market.
English
0
0
11
870
HUN
HUN@hundevmode·
@garrytan Incumbents always call innovation "parasitic" until they realize they can't stop it. If the data belongs to the user, the walls they built are useless. Who actually wins if the integration is seamless?
English
0
0
1
989
Mingta Kaivo 明塔 开沃
@garrytan "parasite" is what incumbents call distribution competitors when the product fight is already over. AudioWave faced the same pattern — legacy tools added export restrictions once they felt the pull. never a good sign for the restrictors.
English
0
0
4
886
Tyler Postle
Tyler Postle@PostleTyler·
@garrytan Hehehe this is rich coming from the company thats promised hundreds of agents, and is trying to acquire their way into that promise. Thats all I can say on that at the moment
English
0
0
3
433
PMtheBuilder
PMtheBuilder@PMThebuilder·
@garrytan The PM question nobody's asking: when agents become the workflow layer, what's the spec for the system of record? Workday never wrote it — and now someone else is writing it for them.
English
0
0
1
736
RigorVC
RigorVC@RigorVC·
@garrytan When the CEO of a $70B company calls you a parasite on an earnings call, you've already won distribution. The question for founders building on top of these systems: can you survive when the host starts closing APIs? That's the moat test.
English
0
0
2
564
NexasTech
NexasTech@NexasTools·
@garrytan Calling agent startups "parasites" is the clearest moat confession possible. The threat is not chat UX, it is workflow control: if a user can authenticate once and let an agent act across CRM, ERP, and support, the system of record becomes a rented database.
English
0
0
1
886
Phil
Phil@phil_hong1·
@garrytan Someone send me access so I can send him a demo of my agent on WD 😭😭
English
0
0
0
24
Time2wakeup
Time2wakeup@Time2wakeup5·
@garrytan only way you keep ur own data is if you run your own operating system that mirrors the public on- and use brave browsers to visit sites and use AI as cyber security blocking all incoming pings form the bridge
English
0
0
2
186
Dairy Queen
Dairy Queen@DairyQueen·
Free Cone Day is here! Come celebrate with us at a DQ location on today by getting a FREE small vanilla cone 🍦
English
894
2.3K
14.7K
23.8M
The Shortlist NYC
The Shortlist NYC@TheShortlistNYC·
when incumbents start calling startups "parasites" it means the startups are winning we see it every month at shortlist nyc. founders building on top of legacy infrastructure that workday, salesforce, and oracle built 20 years ago and never updated the "parasite" is just the new product users actually want
English
0
0
1
633
not_bhavik
not_bhavik@Bhavik0880·
@garrytan So they think startups are going to use their data in better ways than they are... That tracks
English
0
0
1
152
Celebrant 98
Celebrant 98@Jnxx37Nowak·
@garrytan Couldn’t the same be said of the data used to train llm’s?
English
0
0
2
126
Inflectiv AI ⧉
Inflectiv AI ⧉@inflectivAI·
@garrytan By calling startups "parasites," Workday is acknowledging that they no longer own the innovation, only the data. They are using "Flex Credits" and API tolls as a desperate gatekeeping mechanism to tax the very agents that are actually solving user problems.
English
0
0
6
636
Najeeb Abubakar👾
@garrytan the "parasites" framing reveals the actual fear. when incumbents start policing the data layer instead of improving the product, the moat is showing its cracks. user data portability is the real battlefield and startups who win will be the ones who make switching painless
English
0
0
1
467
Kate Ivanova
Kate Ivanova@ivanidze404·
@garrytan "user data belongs to users" is the line every startup should tattoo on their pitch deck. incumbents built moats from data they were entrusted with. that's the actual story here.
English
0
0
0
364
Jeffrey Escobar
Jeffrey Escobar@JeffEscobars·
incumbents calling builders parasites is the ultimate buy signal for the agentic layer. the future belongs to whoever uses the data to actually get things done, not just the ones who store it in a legacy silo. human judgment is the only thing that will keep these systems from eating each other
English
0
0
2
175
deepan
deepan@meksikanpijja·
@garrytan happening all over the place - slack, hubspot, etc. in the end i can't help but think customers will revolt and churn, switching costs be damned. it's either that, or miss out on the most transformative tech shift maybe ever.
English
0
0
1
436
Dan Widmaier 🧬/acc
Dan Widmaier 🧬/acc@dwidmaier·
@garrytan Funny thing is he was once a startup… odd how the tone changes when you become the incumbent
English
0
0
2
327
Kyle Cordes
Kyle Cordes@kylecordes·
@garrytan I wonder how many of these companies are aggressively updating their legal agreements to claim ownership of their customers' data.
English
0
0
2
248
Pyre
Pyre@Mad_dev·
@garrytan I will ask my ai agent to vibe code a WorkDay clone, but for both human and agentic employees
English
0
0
1
86
Stacey Hart
Stacey Hart@staceybuildsai·
@garrytan Workday has never sold to a freelancer or a 10-person firm. the 'parasites' he's calling out are already eating that market. QuickBooks isn't putting up much of a fight either.
English
0
0
2
115
Renato Villanueva
Renato Villanueva@_renatov·
@garrytan It’s crazy to think that they are fighting vs partnering with. Are there examples of companies at scale like Workday actually taking a strategic M&A approach?
English
0
0
1
151
Sid Jain
Sid Jain@TheBengaluruGuy·
@garrytan Every company is either a DB or a LLM on top of it eventually. RIP UIs
English
0
0
1
40
Tom Schmidt
Tom Schmidt@enshun·
@garrytan Workday ranks among the worst software I have ever used. Thank god they have an MCP server. Help is on the way
English
0
0
1
59
Aaron Erickson
Aaron Erickson@AaronErickson·
@garrytan Some nerve. Find me one person on planet earth that ever uses Workday on purpose. I’ll wait.
English
0
0
1
46
Blake Heron
Blake Heron@BlakeHer_on·
@garrytan calling your competition parasites on an earnings call is a good way to tell investors you’re scared without saying you’re scared.
English
0
0
2
179
(((JReuben1)))
(((JReuben1)))@jreuben1·
@garrytan he's not wrong: the Token poor are the bottom feeders of the GPU rich. Its like magicians giving out magic AI lamps with limited token wishes per second.
English
0
0
0
88
Chia sẻ