Brandon

35.1K posts

Brandon banner
Brandon

Brandon

@Brand0n

Los Santos Tham gia Aralık 2009
474 Đang theo dõi7.8K Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
We, Robot drone show highlights above Burbank tonight
Brandon tweet mediaBrandon tweet mediaBrandon tweet media
English
100
840
12.1K
558K
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
2 lightbars are better than 1
Brandon tweet media
English
2
5
29
337
Jim McPherson
Jim McPherson@JamesMcPherson·
Tesla has really solved the sun glare problem that everyone told me would be impossible without HW5. I’m completely blinded myself in this photo. FSD handling it is much safer.
Jim McPherson tweet media
English
10
5
34
874
Justin
Justin@justin_horn·
I’m going on record as of March 2026, the “Tesla community” is dead. The loudest voices are some OG shills that have blocked me and a bunch of new $TSLA lemmings.
English
22
3
66
3.1K
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
@old_memory They don’t even make cool sounds like this anymore either
English
1
0
0
37
old memory
old memory@old_memory·
sounds only xbox 360 kids will know
English
12
164
1K
22.7K
Dogan Ural
Dogan Ural@doganuraldesign·
Fuck it, man. I’m so sick of these algorithm changes.
English
284
83
2K
215.3K
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
@Tesla Can't wait for V14 Lite to be deployed directly into my HW3 Model 3
English
1
4
11
467
Tesla
Tesla@Tesla·
We – design the chips & hardware – make the cars w/ said hardware – collect real-world data at scale – train the real-world AI model – built (& continue to expand) the massive supercomputer cluster that trains it – deploy AI directly to millions of robots on wheels All that is shared with @Tesla_Optimus for broader applications in both the physical & digital world
English
460
1K
7.1K
457.4K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Carwow just released a new video to its 11 million YouTube subscribers titled: "Why Tesla Full Self Drive is Pointless!" @carwowuk misleads its viewers into thinking Tesla’s Autopilot is FSD, even though FSD hasn’t been approved in the UK yet. Autopilot isn’t meant for city driving, yet they test of bunch of scenarios that Autopilot wasn't built to do in the first place....
Sawyer Merritt tweet media
English
424
197
2.8K
212.1K
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
@elonmusk No. It has been inconsistently bad the past year
English
0
0
1
26
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Algorithm is better today than 3 months ago?
English
16K
4.2K
19.7K
34.7M
Man Cave Mike
Man Cave Mike@Man_Cave_Mike·
Motorcycle wheelie
English
5
2
20
949
Brandon
Brandon@Brand0n·
@EZebroni First person that rents it will total it 💯
English
1
0
14
502
Ethan
Ethan@EZebroni·
I can’t wait to get this Tesla Roadster 2.0 and list it on Turo for $999 per day. So many people will rent it at that rate. I’ll have it paid off in about 3 months.
English
20
0
91
7.7K
Jeremy
Jeremy@Jeremy3292·
@NotATeslaApp @elonmusk @aelluswamy I personally just don’t see this happening at any large scale. They’ll delay it as long as they can when most HW3 owners have dumped their cars or FSD transferred to a new AI4/AI5 vehicle. There will be a few (rightfully) stubborn people who stick it out, but not many.
English
5
0
7
2K
William Buckley
William Buckley@WilliamLBuckley·
@NotATeslaApp @elonmusk @aelluswamy Here’s an update buy a new S3XY vehicle 😂 if you really want it. 12.6.4 is sufficient and less buggy more predictable. Better than v 13 in my opinion. V14 is a nice and smooth parks and un-parks. Although, it’s definitely not perfect and makes mistakes so far.
English
6
0
6
2.3K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Tesla’s forthcoming AI5 uses a half-reticle design, which is crucial for yield. A reticle defines the imaging area of a lithography machine, fitting two chips per shot effectively doubles yield. This means the Tesla chip design team had to carefully manage die features, for instance dropping the older ISP (and classic GPU) to make room for more AI cores. By contrast, NVIDIA’s Blackwell fills nearly a full reticle, making it a single-reticle design. If Tesla hits its compute and efficiency targets with AI5 in this half-reticle format, it’s almost like cutting fab requirements in half. And this has a big impact on Terafab, especially if it carries forward for AI6, AI7, etc.
phil beisel tweet media
phil beisel@pbeisel

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

English
58
185
2.1K
341.3K