Drew H. Catch

@avfcwrld @BTRBT_ @DB0ii69 How does that work at a societal level when you have more than, say, a couple hundred people? You’re saying some states could vote to have living space allocation increased for pets, vs not?

The people decide the particulars to what is fair as a group and take into account each perspective. I don’t believe in a ‘leader’ per se, I believe that working people as a unit deserve a fairer, more enjoyable and fulfilling life that profit incentives and so called ‘free markets’ don’t allow for, and since the workers are the backbone of society they should be able to make these decisions, not those who have more capital that extract the wealth from their labour.

You're so close to getting it.

@iamjhasanjay @AdityaRajKaul Ahhh yes; abandon the west and move towards China. China loves India of course

@AdityaRajKaul Why are you so bothered about statements US makes … their policies are just like their statements … used to change every hour…India must invest their time, money and foreign policy for BRICS

Americans are going to regret this statement so badly one day. JD Vance says: “I have joked that I have two very, very important people in my life. An Indian and a Pakistani. The Indian is my wife, and the Pakistani is Field Marshal Munir.”

@AezzieUwU They won’t work for cheap?

Can a conservative/libertarian actually explain to me why they actually believe if they stripped regulations/minimum wage that companies will just self-regulate out of the goodness of their heart? Thats genuinely gotta be one of the most delusional ideas I’ve ever heard.

@ThinkFinance999 Blaming EU complaints ignores how China enforces those blocks. Beijing strictly bottlenecks Ukrainian purchases while allowing massive Russian state-backed smuggling networks to operate freely. Selective enforcement of export laws is not neutrality.

Also, some of the direct export blocks were prompted by stupid EU politicians complaining about Chinese supplies to Russia, apparently oblivious to the fact China also supplied the other side. Said another way, you asked for that particular outcome. But the parts continued flowing.

A world where the US decides what the EU can or cannot sell to China should be very obviously unacceptable to Europe. But, of course, the US fifth column in Europe will certainly act in the shadows to make it otherwise.

@ThinkFinance999 Ukraine cutting Chinese drone parts to 38% was a forced shift to domestic production due to unreliable supply. Furthermore, China secretly trains Russian drone operators as its components in Shaheds increase. This is not neutrality! Come on

Cutting to 38% in a much larger number of drones doesn't even mean fewer parts, and then there's the need to understand how it's all accounted for as lots of (nearly all) imports will be mislabeled, indirect. Nearly all optical fiber being used by both sides is Chinese, for instance. Notice that there's a lot of incentive to present you with a lower number in this case, so all possible machinations to show you a lower number will be used. In general skepticism is highly warranted for a lot of stuff in the current world. The only certainty in this case is that China is a huge supplier to both sides.

@CatchToonda I'm real, China is treating the two sides neutrally. The dual use stuff isn't (in practice) restricted to any of the two sides. The military stuff is restricted to both sides. Dig into it further and you'll see this is reality.

@ThinkFinance999 False equivalence. Ukraine scavenging commercial parts via black markets despite Beijing's export blocks is not equal to China deliberately supplying 90% of Russia’s defense electronics. State-backed industrial life-support is not neutrality.

As I said, indirectly that stuff reaches both sides. Nobody is saying Russia doesn't get it. I'm saying both sides get it, which means China acts as a neutral party. You're just equating it supplying Russia indirectly as not being neutral, forgetting that it equally supplies the other side, which is within the meaning of "neutral".

@ThinkFinance999 China cut its parts in Ukraine's drones to 38% via export restrictions while selling full drone production lines to Russia. This is literally an embargo, not neutrality. kyivpost.com/post/71701#

If you think those massive numbers of drones the other side uses aren't running on Chinese componentry you're very wrong... As I said, in practice China is neutral, though neutral does mean ignoring western sanctions and keeping the economic routes open, which is very useful for Russia, and it also includes lots of dual use stuff which, again, reaches both sides (mostly indirectly).

@ThinkFinance999 Labor migration explains textile factories in Vietnam, not the 3x post-2022 spike in dual-use tech exports to Central Asia. Corporate filings won't report sanctions evasion. Surging machine shipments to Russian neighbors aren't about cheap labor; they are smuggling pipelines.

The regional investments started a long time ago. Some are as you say, many are not. The main driving force has been that labor costs increased a lot in China, so many lower value added activities migrated regionally. I have read many hundreds of filings from HK-listed companies with business in mainland China, the above is the reality.

@ThinkFinance999 China isn't passively keeping markets open; it is actively supplying the dual-use tech sustaining Russia’s military. Its regional investments are largely transshipment hubs for sanctions evasion. Be real

@CatchToonda It has turned out reasonably ok - Chinese firms have been investing heavily into neighboring countries... China's contribution to Russia has been mostly in keeping markets between China and Russia reasonably open.

@ThinkFinance999 Partnering with China, will get you more local investment and improve your ability to compete? How has that turned out with their current partners? And is Russia obviously different? Ukraine may be kinetic now, but Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, India, and Myanmar may feel different.

@CatchToonda Partner with China is obvious because they'd be investing a locally, and improving the local ability to compete (due to exposure to more competitive players and having better suppliers). With Russia the problem is obvious and until solved...

@avfcwrld @BTRBT_ @DB0ii69 Like, vote to decide if that’s a thing?

@CatchToonda @BTRBT_ @DB0ii69 Community decision

@i_am_the_truest @BigBichote Pussy. Signal your virtue more loser

@BigBichote Honestly as a very non-confrontational white guy I’m moving on too, without any thought other than that I have a crazy story to tell, I don’t have time for this shit, and being racist because of a personal incident is loser behavior

This would make me racist

@NestarTheGod @BanConsulate It’s a$$

@BanConsulate Turn it up🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@avfcwrld @BTRBT_ @DB0ii69 Alright; you’re in charge of communist America, you’re responsible for re-dividing living spaces based on needs. Do you give people with dogs more square footage?

@BTRBT_ @DB0ii69 Marxist professor trapped in capitalist system is not true Marxist as he engages in said system - got it

@ThinkFinance999 Or, you can look at it as someone with agency, which Europe has, and can make a choice between the two spheres. But we all know what will happen if you choose to switch sides. Maybe you could partner with Russia too, it would make your energy cheaper

@CatchToonda Notice what that implies - that Europe cannot decide in its own interests as it will be subjected to US sanctions if it does. Who would want to partner with the US under such obvious coercion? That's a powerful reason to NOT partner with them.

@ThinkFinance999 Well; with that point of view, go for it! Sanctions be damned

I think Europe should decide in its own interests. Such interests, right now, would involve having the Chinese establish production, advanced suppliers in Europe, enabling Europeans to also be competitive elsewhere. Also, by breaking the US blockade on advanced semiconductors, Europe could create an entire semiconductor industry in Europe, using Chinese investment.

@ThinkFinance999 You honestly think that? You really honest to god think Europe siding with China would be good for you in the long run? The US has enabled you to freely legislate yourselves to irrelevance, and erode your national defense and pride. That was all you guys.

It doesn't matter what motivated it - it just showed the US hand that you're in the same boat as China, when it comes to the highest tech, if the US wants. China hasn't done the same (except in retaliation for Europe joining other US bans). So now, ira quite obvious that it's better for Europe to align with China than with the US. Which, of course, is a tremendous change from the past, so in spite of it being obvious, most won't accept it for a long time, further delaying Europe's own development.

@ThinkFinance999 Europe was unfortunately in the ban, but using critical thinking here, was the ban initiated because of European exposure? No of course not. It was banned because of the concern of distillation from… China again!

The Fable ban was directed at ALL foreigners... Including Europe. Your logic is broken. You seem to think that since everyone else was also targeted, Europe wasn't targeted? Do you understand that the logic went from "you're either with us or against us" to "you're either us or you're not us"? It's subtle. Do you really think it's best to align with those who exclude you (and everyone else)?

@ThinkFinance999 Oh don’t cry. We all know the Fable ban wasn’t directed at Europe

@CatchToonda And this from a country that just turns around and tells Europe it won't have access to the most advanced AI model. It's like a straight joke, to be a vassal to such a thing.