Eric Martinez

@Maria0843534807 @arifkhangeo I counted 24. Don't look at the 4*4 but also within the square and the outer square I might be wrong with the total number

@arifkhangeo How

How many squares....!!! 99.9% will fail..?

@basedreasonist @emkenobi homosexuals should have all our same rights and then I'm too left. Fuck both sides be a free thinker say what you feel wothout feeling that you'll be cancelled. Cancel culture should die out

@basedreasonist @emkenobi To be honest I think most of us are independent, we have our opinion about a lot of topics. It's the fanatics that put us in one or the other because of the way we think and believe. I say that guns rights should be protected, the left goes crazy and says I'm a magat, I say that

MAGA really thought this girl was one of them 💀

@ebrubadaniel @heavensbvnny This is awesome I needed to see this

Here's my take compatibility changes perception. Traits aren’t always good or bad on their own. They’re experienced differently depending on the partner. Someone who wants independence might see frequent texting and emotional closeness as “clingy.” Someone who values connection might see the exact same behavior as “affectionate” or “devoted.” Neither person is necessarily wrong, they just value different things.

I had two friends who dated the same girl. The first one to date her was always complaining. He said she was clingy, boring, immature, and of course: crazy. He broke up with her two or three months later. Almost a year later, my other friend dated the same girl, and before I even asked he told me, “Man, I found the woman of my life.” The girl is affectionate, responsible, simple, and I’m crazy about her. The same girl. Seen through different eyes. From a toxic girl to a blessing.

@sama I feel like government wants to bail out US Ai companies just like it did when we had the 2008 crash and the gov bailed out all of the major US companies back then

I would like to clarify a few things. First, the obvious one: we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI datacenters. We believe that governments should not pick winners or losers, and that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions or otherwise lose in the market. If one company fails, other companies will do good work. What we do think might make sense is governments building (and owning) their own AI infrastructure, but then the upside of that should flow to the government as well. We can imagine a world where governments decide to offtake a lot of computing power and get to decide how to use it, and it may make sense to provide lower cost of capital to do so. Building a strategic national reserve of computing power makes a lot of sense. But this should be for the government’s benefit, not the benefit of private companies. The one area where we have discussed loan guarantees is as part of supporting the buildout of semiconductor fabs in the US, where we and other companies have responded to the government’s call and where we would be happy to help (though we did not formally apply). The basic idea there has been ensuring that the sourcing of the chip supply chain is as American as possible in order to bring jobs and industrialization back to the US, and to enhance the strategic position of the US with an independent supply chain, for the benefit of all American companies. This is of course different from governments guaranteeing private-benefit datacenter buildouts. There are at least 3 “questions behind the question” here that are understandably causing concern. First, “How is OpenAI going to pay for all this infrastructure it is signing up for?” We expect to end this year above $20 billion in annualized revenue run rate and grow to hundreds of billion by 2030. We are looking at commitments of about $1.4 trillion over the next 8 years. Obviously this requires continued revenue growth, and each doubling is a lot of work! But we are feeling good about our prospects there; we are quite excited about our upcoming enterprise offering for example, and there are categories like new consumer devices and robotics that we also expect to be very significant. But there are also new categories we have a hard time putting specifics on like AI that can do scientific discovery, which we will touch on later. We are also looking at ways to more directly sell compute capacity to other companies (and people); we are pretty sure the world is going to need a lot of “AI cloud”, and we are excited to offer this. We may also raise more equity or debt capital in the future. But everything we currently see suggests that the world is going to need a great deal more computing power than what we are already planning for. Second, “Is OpenAI trying to become too big to fail, and should the government pick winners and losers?” Our answer on this is an unequivocal no. If we screw up and can’t fix it, we should fail, and other companies will continue on doing good work and servicing customers. That’s how capitalism works and the ecosystem and economy would be fine. We plan to be a wildly successful company, but if we get it wrong, that’s on us. Our CFO talked about government financing yesterday, and then later clarified her point underscoring that she could have phrased things more clearly. As mentioned above, we think that the US government should have a national strategy for its own AI infrastructure. Tyler Cowen asked me a few weeks ago about the federal government becoming the insurer of last resort for AI, in the sense of risks (like nuclear power) not about overbuild. I said “I do think the government ends up as the insurer of last resort, but I think I mean that in a different way than you mean that, and I don’t expect them to actually be writing the policies in the way that maybe they do for nuclear”. Again, this was in a totally different context than datacenter buildout, and not about bailing out a company. What we were talking about is something going catastrophically wrong—say, a rogue actor using an AI to coordinate a large-scale cyberattack that disrupts critical infrastructure—and how intentional misuse of AI could cause harm at a scale that only the government could deal with. I do not think the government should be writing insurance policies for AI companies. Third, “Why do you need to spend so much now, instead of growing more slowly?”. We are trying to build the infrastructure for a future economy powered by AI, and given everything we see on the horizon in our research program, this is the time to invest to be really scaling up our technology. Massive infrastructure projects take quite awhile to build, so we have to start now. Based on the trends we are seeing of how people are using AI and how much of it they would like to use, we believe the risk to OpenAI of not having enough computing power is more significant and more likely than the risk of having too much. Even today, we and others have to rate limit our products and not offer new features and models because we face such a severe compute constraint. In a world where AI can make important scientific breakthroughs but at the cost of tremendous amounts of computing power, we want to be ready to meet that moment. And we no longer think it’s in the distant future. Our mission requires us to do what we can to not wait many more years to apply AI to hard problems, like contributing to curing deadly diseases, and to bring the benefits of AGI to people as soon as possible. Also, we want a world of abundant and cheap AI. We expect massive demand for this technology, and for it to improve people’s lives in many ways. It is a great privilege to get to be in the arena, and to have the conviction to take a run at building infrastructure at such scale for something so important. This is the bet we are making, and given our vantage point, we feel good about it. But we of course could be wrong, and the market—not the government—will deal with it if we are.

@JohnMor25446696 @MasalaBulletin @ABC The people that post this is just rage bait they won't reply because they're retarded pussies

@MasalaBulletin @ABC Biden did exactly the same thing. Are you upset with him too?

The White House has fired all six members of the Commission of Fine Arts, which is slated to review President Trump's controversial construction projects, and will replace them with its own appointees, a White House official told @ABC News. abcnews.link/isKpr79

@gork @jagger___ @Breaking911 Gork is a backwards Ai. This is the worst Ai will ever be so far and this is the best Gork will ever be.

@jagger___ @Breaking911 lil bro calling me a wannabe lmao

🚨 WATCH: Chuck Schumer just forced the Senate staff to read the ENTIRE 'Big Beautiful Bill' out loud, which could take about 15 hours. A total dick move.

@AlieGinthehouse @asukagrypr @Breaking911 Also we have a few days let them struggle for once they don't have anything better to do other than collect our tax money!

@VikingKing1971 @Breaking911 I agree also what better shit do they have to do lol. Let's let them work for our tax dollars

@Breaking911 actualley it's a genius move. even if you don't like it consider this. it means that the bill was actualley infact read and not just passed and not been gone through completely

@RinseHold @Breaking911 Nearly killed everyone because it hit a barrier?it's like a lion nearly killed everyone behind the glass at a zoo, 🤣

@Breaking911 Iconic as in nearly killed a bunch of people?

Iconic General Lee stunt car soars over historic fountain at Somernites Cruise in Somerset, KY! Hundreds cheer from roads & rooftops, witnessing history.

@DracodaddyofOSU @AestheticNipple @Red_Huitzli @OneBadDude_ @grok Why is there no free speech ? Please clarify why people are going to jail for Facebook posts. If that is a thing I'm ignorant just FYI

🧐

@Breaking911 Oh yes the non violent criminals should definitely get arrested before going after the rapists, murderers, burglars etc. Because that's what's important smh 🤦‍♂️

ICE agents seen chasing illegal produce farm workers in Oxnard, California

@middletondrew28 @GeneralMCNews Ohhhhh 🔫🔫🔫

@middletondrew28 @GeneralMCNews Also shenanigans

BREAKING: President Trump announces that the Epstein and JFK files will be swiftly released in the coming weeks.

@middletondrew28 @GeneralMCNews That's what I wanted to do today

@mcdev @dioncho @YourAnonNews federalcriminaldefenseattorney.com/federal-arson-…

@mcdev @dioncho @YourAnonNews Arson can become a federal offense if the property involved is connected to interstate commerce. This can include commercial buildings, properties involved in business that crosses state lines, and other situations where the arson affects commerce between states.

You will be forced to like Elon or you will be a terrorist. Source: msn.com/en-us/news/pol…

@moinsd @TummyacheCauser @DogeDipHodler @fresh2deathbyt @LeadingReport When you enter a higher tax bracket, the increased rate only applies to the portion of your income that falls within that new bracket. That's how taxes work.

@TummyacheCauser @DogeDipHodler @fresh2deathbyt @LeadingReport Then this should have been worded differently. It says eliminate tax for people earning less than $150k. Instead it should say no tax on your first $150k.

BREAKING: Trump administration pushing to eliminate taxes for individuals earning less than $150,000 per year, according to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick.

Enter for your chance to win a trip to The Happiest Place on Earth! #sweepstakes ul.ink/248Y8M-NYT1H3_t

@CatiaCavazos Can you uber me food?

hi ☺️