Del Current

🏀❤️ I created a new IG for my training business. I’ll post the name in the comment section. The content on there is going to be very informative. But first watch this 👇🏽 😍

@DelCurrent 10.04 instantly goes lower when he and someone start to work on his start, his block set up, and continuing to do a great job on his top end training.

Nah I ain’t gonna lie. From 60m-100m that’s the fastest I’ve seen somebody run in a long time.

Bringing the energy to your city next 🔥🔥 Rock with us at CMO SoCal up next on June 22-23rd!! OC what’s good!! #ELITEisEARNED

Some rosters are talented on paper but they don’t have the right pieces. You need spacers.

That little girl on the left just popped 2:17 as a 7th grader… 😬 In March. Racing against HS..

Going through my phone and saw this from a very long time ago… Just work.

@CoachHPrice It’s mean to say 12 see and lower. I picked before Covid and before portal to show a reflection of a normal year vs new portal/nil era…

@DelCurrent Why’d you pick those years and that one seed?

There used to be more upsets because the small school advantage was that they had their guys 3-4 years and their continuity beat the one year wonder talent. Now if you flash at a small school the big schools scoop you up. So now the small schools have less talent with the same lack on continuity. It’s a big bummer for the early rounds but probably better for the middle rounds. #MarchMadness

@CoachHPrice Probably 1-2… But for reference.. In 2017 for reference only 1 12 seed or worse won.. In 2018, three 12 seeds won. 12-16 don’t win often. It’s our memory that makes us think differently.

@DelCurrent How many 12-16 seeds?

@CoachHPrice There’s been 7 lower seed victories and several other close ones… I would say that’s huge given they weren’t slated to win

@DelCurrent Out of the 20ish games how many have been upsets? Let’s say higher than an 11 seed.

I'm excited to announce my commitment to @LionUpWBB. On my way to the 🥾 @SAFinestbball @_3Generations @bbetterperform @slkgbb

@mws Feedback when it’s from a place of fandom and wanting to help is worth its weight in gold. Always searching it out.

A small YouTuber made a video titled ‘MrBeast is Boring Now’ In 2 days of the video being up, MrBeast wrote this comment The biggest YouTuber in the world, and he’s down to brainstorm with a YouTuber who just hit 1K Plus they already hopped on calls together Love to see it

On the debate if Olympics were an open market what are the probabilities that U.S. would earn more medals I asked one of my ai tools from statistical perspective: Changing Olympic entry limits from top 3 to top 8 per country would substantially increase U.S. medal totals, especially silver and bronze, and would likely make the medal table less balanced across nations. The current 3-entry rule suppresses the observable advantage of countries with extraordinary depth. Expanding entries would reveal more of that hidden depth and disproportionately benefit the United States. In plain English: The current rules hold the U.S. back more than they hold most countries back. Biggest winners would be •United States •China •maybe Australia •maybe Great Britain Countries that are elite because of efficiency or specialization, but do not have huge depth, would benefit less. Example logic: •Norway might still be great in its best sports •Jamaica would still be dangerous in sprints •Kenya in distance, but they often would not add as many extra medal-level athletes across many events as the U.S. would

Agree with this. But also the U.S. National Trials is the hardest in the world. Nowhere compared to Norway, that can be looked at. On any given day an athlete can get upset and steal spots. And I don’t think it would be any different if there was an unlimited amount of spots and just based on time qualification. You would see more heavy U.S. finals in many events.

But it also backfires. Norway would have even more medals if they were allowed to send 50 people. Same with Kenya. But even there it’s limited because there are only 3 medals per event. So it’s not so much the athlete cap influences per capita. Its more that at a small n, a few medals has an oversized effect.

The key to Norway's sporting success?
 "It takes everything we do in the US and does the opposite. We treat child athletes like budding professionals, prodigies train like the pros they look up to. In Norway, they let kids be kids. We don't keep score before age 12."

I definitely think per capita should be used as something to look and identify what makes them different, especially if the are excelling in a particular event. But it’s hard to say that a country produces more elite athletes than the U.S. No different than Jamaica in sprinting and Kenya in distance. Because of a multitude of reasons they excel. But doesn’t mean they have the key to success from an overall point of view

@DelCurrent @COSDAWGCFB Per capita isn’t perfect. It’s just a rough way to look at things.

@stevemagness @COSDAWGCFB Just spends on strength of events. There are so many events not including just running. And the per capita take works when smaller countries are good at a specific event.

@DelCurrent @COSDAWGCFB But when you’re only counting 3 medalists this is largely negated. It’s negligible. Even if the US could bring 100 sprinters there medal count isn’t changing much. And would suffer if Kenya was allowed the same for example.

I never understood why coaches emphasized diving on loose balls but will allow a player to take bad shots. Turnovers are turnovers. Also I don’t think coaches should waste a time out on early possession tie ups when they can use the timeout in a more meaningful way later.

Example: let’s say the Olympics decided that they are going to add a 60m dash, a 300m dash, more swimming events etc and the USA is allowed to bring 6 athletes instead of 3.. Their medal count per capita would increase. I know not everybody took statistics but there are limited factors.