Educatednoob

@RURALINDIA Govt is of the people by the people and for the people. People elect the govt and govt appoints the lawyer.

The SG continues to be Government’s lawyer whereas he’s meant to be people’s lawyer.

@ShriCAD @Doctor_Gargi They won't be overturned because they are not in challenge. Also government will also not submit review petition because it will put them in a bad spot. I wouldn't worry about them.

@Doctor_Gargi All under threat under Sabarimala if SC agrees with Govt and sets new precedent that "morality" doesn't mean constitutional morality but societal morality

NALSA vs UOI (Transgender rights) ➡️ navtej singh Johar vs UOI (rights of persons with diff. sexual orientation) ➡️Joseph Shine v. Union of India(autonomy) ➡️puttuswamy vs UOI (right to privacy) ➡️ X vs The Principal Secretary Health (abortion right)contd🫡

@alabhyadhamija Seeing rumours in Twitter that the money was not his but someone else's money merely parked there. Corruption is there but I guess he is the scapegoat. His words clearly claim innocence and doesn't point to anyone also.

I don’t think I’ve said this publicly. But I’ll say it today. There seems to be something very fishy with this case. Things don’t add up at all

@anishgawande There is a constitution Bench judgement of the supreme court which states Judges do not work at the pleasure of the president of India. The moment he gave the resignation letter he ceases to be a judge of the high court. President cannot reject the resignation letter.

The President of India must not accept Justice Yashwant Varma's resignation. Accepting this resignation would make a mockery of parliamentary impeachment proceedings. It would mean a judge can stonewall every inquiry, lose every legal challenge, and still walk away before the truth comes out. Last year, firefighters found two-foot-high stacks of burnt ₹500 notes at his official residence in Delhi. A three-judge Supreme Court committee spoke to 55 witnesses, reviewed CCTV footage, and found him responsible for "misconduct" with "strong inferential evidence" of his control over the cash. When the CJI asked him to resign, he refused and chose to face inquiry instead. He challenged the in-house committee. He challenged the parliamentary inquiry panel. Finally, 145 Lok Sabha MPs across party lines had to sign an impeachment motion. As the All India Bar Association has demanded, that impeachment process must be allowed to reach its constitutionally mandated conclusion. The truth cannot be prevented from coming out.

@rushil_batra Isn't non locus religion PIL going?

The 9 Judge reference is scary to even watch online. But the larger question is: If PIL goes, how will the weekend lectures be sustained? :)

@kunsha51 He said the courts using principles of constitutional morality directly led to joseph shine and navtej Johar which essentially led to sabrimala

@KingsOfMovies @grok what film is this?

so it was planned all along?

@DaTruthDT Agl ssj4 gogeta was just aura farming all the way from 12ki to active skill. Daima goku had to be aura farming in his animations more than gogeta. I hate the fact that part 2 picks are gonna have better animations than daima.

COMMUNITY REACTION!!!!!! DAIMA SSJ4 GOKU!!! DAIMA SSJ3 VEGETA!!! 11TH ANNIVERSARY PART 1 WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK?????

@DaTruthDT Giving every unit damage reduction and dodge really hurt the game. Because units without them suffer a lot.

If you have a Hot Take thread you need me to look through. Post it here 🧐👇

@sandeep_PT Uncle aap rehne. Aap sirf modi modi karo. Inn sab me suit nai hote aap

6 lies, wrapped in corporate feel-good morality Let me unpack each one by one - Lie # 1. For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt. Truth: India's primary fractures aren't around class, but caste. You intentionally avoid any mention of the dreaded word, as your entire primary support group will revolt. Also, most middle class and all rich employed many many poor folks (mostly from lower castes & lower classes) whom they always saw face to face, daily, for many hours, without battling an eyelid. And whom they did everything to treat miserably - as a simple example remember your society's apartheid lift (the service lift, compulsory for all workers)? Lie # 2. The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale. Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general. Truth: A total lie as the poor (lower castes, lower classes) were always right inside our homes always. Gigs have only made a few extra seconds of contact at the doors. In elite societies, not even that as they send their maids to collect the parcels from "that other lift" (apartheid) 'where that delivery boy left that parcel', or from that main door. Only a blind elite will not have seen the armies of poor toiling in the streets, without of course the red gear and bags they're to carry now in gigs. At least to that extent you're being honest. (In 2017, I fought tooth-and-nail with my RWA to have all lifts opened for everyone, 24x7, to end the visible apartheid against workers (including your gig workers). Nine years on, the freedom has held. That is what genuine concern should be like.) Lie # 3. This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less. We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal. Truth: We have dealt with the less fortunate for ages, as our maids, our cleaners, our drivers, our liftmen, our general helps, and many many more. We (most of us) have always paid them a pittance, while feeling no guilt at all. What you call guilt now is actually a real sense (in some enlightened minds) of realizing how badly our society has gone wrong, and instead you couch your exploitation now in poetic words and throw it back to society in the most blunt of ways. This is exactly the worst form of capitalism, couched in hollow morality, while sucking out every drop of lifeblood from workers. Your choice of words (miscreants) exposed you entirely. That's exactly why you're covering up for it now. Lie # 4. Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”). And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility. Truth: The rich are enjoying luxury even today without any moral discomfort at all. Are they chopping down entire mountains and forests while retaining their morality? Are they capturing and cornering national public assets for pittance while crying alone in their bedrooms? Are they settling abroad in hordes while bathed in morality? Are they looting billions from banks and scooting out of a moral sense? The labour in factories was never out of sight, nor at construction sites, nor in large stores. What you call clumsy solutions are your way of branding anyone demanding dignity and honour. Sad. Lie # 5. Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income. And then what happens? Truth: No one called for banning gig work. No one at all. If people wish to work for you, brilliant, let them. All demands are about giving living wages without exploitation, and without a God complex. What you call formal economy (just because they use your phone apps) is actually worse than informal economy jobs because it's a pretence. You create a nightmare scenario just to scare people into accepting your version of truth (which is part exploitation, part nonsense, and remaining part your necessity). Lie # 6. The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated. The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door. Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark. Truth: So you assume cash economies are exploitation? Are you equating cash (earned with hard work) as black money and exploitation? Are you sure your customers in high-rise societies are actually seeing your gig workers face to face? Most have already installed structural apartheid by separating the lifts that these workers use! Why don't you ask the government to open large-scale manufacturing units in each district to employ lakhs of these whom you so condescendingly claim to uplift? Because then your model itself will collapse. Continued structural misery with no way out at all is your actual guarantee of success and that's what you're now using fancy words to justify, instead of genuinely honestly respecting the truth and giving fair honest wages. You do zero capex and maintenance on assets your labour uses (bikes and other things) and call yourself a capitalist. You are just a socialist protected by poverty, aided by the State machine, constantly masquerading as a free market angel. In reality, our Indian society is one giant pyramid of multiple rigid layers, each doing its best to suppress the ones below, and bootlicking those above without any pangs at all. You choose to present the truth in a light that's convenient to you, but is not at all the truth. It has become second nature for middle class Indians now to justify all exploitation, as that becomes their own escape route for being totally unable to do anything against their own exploitation by various means. All you need to do is reach out to your own "partners" and listen to them, and give them honourable wages & terms of work. And stop branding the dissenters and involving law enforcement to threaten those. But then, all we might get again is another hugely long tweet with no meaning at all. Final truth: India has no real capitalism, no real free-markets, no choice of work (for most). All our capitalists have done is privatization of profits, socialization of losses, and guilt-burdening for anyone who calls this out.

@AnkitOArchives Tips is extra pay isnt it. Tips is directly transferred from customer to delivery partner. Tumlog tip bhi nai karoge and rote bhi rhoge tf?

Bragging about ₹2.6/hr in tips is an insult. That won't even buy a tea in 2026. You use tips to shift the burden of fair pay onto customers while you pocket the platform fees. If only 5% of people tip, it proves your model relies on exploitation, not "partner" satisfaction.

@KingSpyke_ Avengers going back in time was supposed to happen because HWR wanted it to happen. Maybe its because HWR is not present anymore to do damage control.

OK, this guy has a point you’re right that they explain a version of what’s supposed to happen in the timeline And you’re wrong because this doesn’t explain Steve and we hurt low-key talk about two Tony Starks Also, Ravona clarifies that Loki is like Steve because what what they did was a different alteration from what they were originally supposed to do in the timeline I’m good at this trust me I know.

@whizkidd I'm not even centrist. Hate both sides.

Quick guide to identifying types of tweeple on Twitter (I refuse to call it X): Right Wing “Sanghi”: Will have at least one tweet mocking Kerala. At least one of those ends with “Kerala saar. 100% literacy saar.” Lib/Leftist: Will post about a bad AirBnB experience in Bulgaria, but still manage to blame a Gujju. If they can’t find a Gujju, they’ll blame Gujarat’s “energy.” Centrist: Says “both sides are the same” and then proceeds to exclusively dunk on one side. (I am this guy) Apolitical: “I’m just here for memes.” Also somehow arguing in 3 threads about constitutional morality. Startup Bro: Tweets “We’re building something that’ll change India 🇮🇳.” Product: a to-do list app with a different font. Urban Planner: Thinks every Indian problem can be solved by “mixed-use zoning” and banning cars. Posts flyover photos like they’re crime scene evidence. Pseudo-Intellectual: Uses words like “zeitgeist” and “socio-political milieu” to describe traffic jams. Quote-tweets memes with “this speaks volumes.” Pop Historian: Tweets 14-part threads on how a Mughal once invented tea. Calls it “long-form content.” Feminist Ally: Bio says “He/Him 🌈.” Posts “Listen to women” right before interrupting one in the replies. Which of these are you? 😆

@VinodAuthor @pbhushan1 @SreenivasanJain Uddhav thackeray resigned. So they couldn't reinstate him. They literally told if Uddhav didn't resign, they could have brought back his govt.

@pbhushan1 @SreenivasanJain Chandrachud is perhaps the most overrated Chief Justice. Vote theft in Chandigarh was caught on camera, yet no punishment followed. Maharashtra’s govt was ruled unconstitutional but not dismissed. Electoral bonds were struck down, yet donations weren’t confiscated.

Justice Chandrachud has been on an interview spree recently. In this interview with @SreenivasanJain he lays bare his communal mindset. Says destruction of Temple 500 yrs ago (of which there was no evidence) is good reason to give the land to the destroyers of the mosque now! No wonder he allowed the survey of the Gyanvapi mosque to continue, despite his judgement in Ayodhya saying that the Places of Worship Act would put an end to such disputes in future! Despicable!

Post your favorite DOKKAN BATTLE images or your thoughts on the campaign #TranscendentDokkanCampaign #Gogeta

@the_fauxy Bhai tumlog bhi na😂😂😂😂

𝗚𝗶𝗿𝗹 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲

Awesome #PlayLegends

@ArijitNobody Because the case was not fought on religious purposes, it was always fought on land ownership.

@SurrbhiM Mob is angry because youth congress leader and nsui general secretary murdered a police officers wife. Kaun dangerous hai bole tum?

After UP now Chhattisgarh is burning . Angry mob chased SDM Jagannath Verma and he ran away with the help of police in Chhattisgarh's Surajpur. BJP is dangerous for India .

@Sydusm @HPhobiaWatch Bhai shant hojao Varna vo apko bhi expose kar dalega😭😭

@HPhobiaWatch Chalbe sanghi chomu

What more proof is needed? On ground, there was a huge wave against BjP in Haryana. People were angry and decided. It was across the state. Ask anyone from this state, anyone. Almost all exit polls had predicted a Congress win by a large margin. Congress was leading in 70+ seats. Most places where Congress lost, the EVMs had 99% battery after being used the whole day. Many voters are feeling cheated. If we continue with our lives without raising serious concerns then might as well stop this drama of elections because they will all be rigged in the future.