Robot_Heart_fl

8.2K posts

Robot_Heart_fl banner
Robot_Heart_fl

Robot_Heart_fl

@FlHeart

Tham gia Nisan 2020
90 Đang theo dõi171 Người theo dõi
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@AjApplegoose @ChrisCuomo Hunter sold maybe at most $3m of paintings. You’re a fucking idiot if you think this scale is even remotely comparable. And this is why we are largely fucked. People like you happen to maybe also live here and there’s no hope.
English
1
0
1
62
AJ 🇺🇸
AJ 🇺🇸@AjApplegoose·
@ChrisCuomo Why were you ok woth Hunter selling art? Not really any different..
English
28
0
4
2.9K
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter@AnnCoulter·
We are so third world. The less well-off will now be forced to go to fake foreign "doctors" -- because of Democrats and ... GUESS WHICH REPUBLICANS? Correct: Mike Lawler, "Republican" of New York and Maria Elvira Salazar, "Republican" of Florida.
Ann Coulter tweet media
English
124
471
1.9K
33K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@VetDad25 @mikenelson586 generally agree, but the lack of respect and deference T shows NATO/its leaders reflects on his view of their populations. and if I’m a voter in [pick a country], I’m not going to want to help a country that hasn’t even convinced its own people that what is happening is good.
English
1
0
3
49
Vet Dad
Vet Dad@VetDad25·
I don’t understand his perspective on this. NATO nations are under NO obligation to help us here. Yes, it is showing us something about those relationships. No, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. And yes, it’s largely caused by our own behavior. BUT - I do think Allies should facilitate access, basing, and overflight.
English
2
0
3
270
Mike Nelson
Mike Nelson@mikenelson586·
I feel you're missing key points including A) the difference between a hypothetical war to defend NATO territory B) whether allies are obligated to join non NATO conflicts in which they were not consulted and for which we haven't even articulated a clear endstate C) the fact that threatening to invade allies might make them less cooperative in the future But besides that, you nailed it
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

Who else remembers half of Europe laughing at Trump when he said America needs to own Greenland because we can’t trust Denmark to fully cooperate in a war?

English
6
8
151
6.7K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@Legal_Fil @Dystop1anFvtvre @ThomBrady5 I think the growing consensus is their mosaic defense doctrine is working better than expected and if we destroyed them so thoroughly, the remaining 5% of their capability are pretty effective at (for example) choking off 15-20% of the worlds energy needs and half of fertilizer.
English
0
0
1
49
Legal Phil
Legal Phil@Legal_Fil·
@Dystop1anFvtvre @ThomBrady5 In fact, they did not. People were expecting far more disruptive strikes, especially on Israel and oil facilities in the Gulf. Instead, there were a handful of successful drone strikes. Not nothing, but much less than any war game assumed.
English
21
6
95
3.6K
Legal Phil
Legal Phil@Legal_Fil·
I'm fascinated by the emerging consensus that having your navy and air force destroyed, your leadership killed off, and having lost complete control of your air space is actually evidence that one is winning. Crazy that we are only now discovering this new military strategy.
English
282
552
4.8K
110.3K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@johnkonrad @erhard97172 @Nervana_1 others have said it, but neither of them invoked article 5. and if it was really a thing, turkey would have no problem just bombing iran itself to tell them to stop it. lastly, denmark is not an extension of the DoD and is not required to take orders from the US.
English
0
0
30
1.7K
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
Who else remembers half of Europe laughing at Trump when he said America needs to own Greenland because we can’t trust Denmark to fully cooperate in a war?
English
951
1.6K
15.1K
441.3K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@AAGDhillon She wasn’t under oath so they don’t believe her. It’s a fair critique.
English
0
0
0
8
Jack Hopkins
Jack Hopkins@thejackhopkins·
Markwayne Mullin: Let’s slow this down for a second...because this is where people get misled by tone...instead of structure. Markwayne Mullin wants you to picture something cinematic. A “top-secret mission.” The kind of phrase that immediately fills in the blanks in your mind...classified briefings...covert travel...high-stakes operations. But...here’s the problem: the actual structure of Congress doesn’t support that story. In 2016, Mullin wasn’t operating in the world where those kinds of missions originate. He was on Energy and Commerce...a committee focused on healthcare, energy policy, telecom, and consumer protection. Not war. Not intelligence. Not covert operations. That lane belongs to the Armed Services and Intelligence. That’s where classified operational oversight lives. So...right out of the gate...the framing doesn’t match the architecture. Now layer in the second problem: the agencies that would have fingerprints on anything resembling a real “mission”...FBI, State, Defense...reportedly couldn’t find records backing his claim. That’s not a minor gap. That’s the entire foundation missing. Because real classified activity leaves traces across systems...even if the details are restricted. Then...it gets worse. When pressed, Mullin reportedly acknowledged he had no formal role with State or Defense. So now you’re being asked to believe in a high-level “top-secret mission” that: *Didn’t run through the committees that handle those matters *Didn’t involve the agencies that execute them *And doesn’t show up in the places it logically should At that point...you’re no longer evaluating a claim. You’re evaluating a story. And when senators walked out of the classified briefing...the one place this should have snapped into focus...they didn’t come out saying, “That checks out.” They came out describing it as “weird,” with indications it may have been closer to a whistleblower or NDA situation than anything resembling a "covert mission." That’s the tell. Because when something is real...the classified version usually strengthens it. Here, it appears to have shrunk it. So...the clean read is this: the most charitable explanation is that Mullin was involved in some confidential congressional matter and is inflating it. The less charitable...and more consistent with the gaps...is that he’s dressing up something routine or ambiguous in the language of covert operations in a weak and sad attempt to manufacture credibility. Either way, “Energy and Commerce top-secret mission” doesn’t hold up under even basic scrutiny. And...that’s before you even get to the oldest rule in the book: When someone leans on “I can’t tell you...it’s classified” to avoid specifics… they’re usually not protecting secrets. They’re protecting the story.
English
31
230
824
25.5K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@amuse @Geiger_Capital Are you saying they sidelined him from meetings when he was in an intelligence job, instead of outright firing him? They have fired tens of thousands (hundreds of?) people for literally nothing but they couldn’t fire him? Is this the argument you make?
English
0
0
1
39
@amuse
@amuse@amuse·
@Geiger_Capital They evidently sidelined him from sensitive meetings and intel for months. He was being monitored by the FBI. He evidently figured out he was under investigation and resigned.
English
56
101
1.4K
12.3K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@HolmesJosh @ComfortablySmug You lose elections badly by being fucking retarded. It would have take MarkWayne or whatever the fuck his name is to say, in 20 seconds, “You should not have been attacked, and I apologize for anything I said that could be construed as saying the attack was ok.” But nope.
English
0
0
6
192
Josh Holmes
Josh Holmes@HolmesJosh·
This is how you lose elections badly. feelings are never more important than the health and well being of the people they represent. I know Rand in his heart agrees. This is silly and dumb. Let’s open a bottle of Ky bourbon and hash this out. Cc: @ComfortablySmug
English
38
26
550
80.7K
Josh Holmes
Josh Holmes@HolmesJosh·
Ok thread - as much as I personally love @RandPaul, @KelleyAshbyPaul and their entire family, I’m dumbfounded by today’s hearing with @SenMullin. I know they don’t get along but nobody in America gives a fuck what they feel.
English
75
102
1.6K
83.1K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@VecchTweets Markwayne could have just said “look, we have had our differences but there was no excuse for what that guy did and I apologize for anything I said that indicated I feel differently.”.
English
0
0
0
5
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@goneers Short answer - Real ID was passed in 2005 w implementation by 2008. Many delays later, finally put into effect in 2025, 20 years later. Many ppl don’t have the docs to re-register quickly. If Real ID had been so easy, why would it have taken so long? ANY QUESTIONS?
English
0
0
0
6
AppPatriotgirl 🇺🇸
Can someone explain to me the difference between requiring Americans to have a Real ID to get on a plane and asking them to show that same Real ID in order to vote? Why isn't it a hardship to get a copy of your marriage license or birth certificate in order to get a Real ID but it is in order to vote for the leader of the free world? Make it make sense, please!
English
517
103
650
18.9K
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@marcorandazza doesn’t matter, that isn’t how it works. unless you want someone (the US?) to police air space everywhere, we have to respect it. stop being a douche.
English
0
0
0
150
Robot_Heart_fl
Robot_Heart_fl@FlHeart·
@AAGDhillon no one believes you. I can’t believe we have to do this for three more years.
English
0
0
0
14
AAGHarmeetDhillon
AAGHarmeetDhillon@AAGDhillon·
That’s me behind her. The Democrats on this committee behaved like petulant children and created drama and stormed out. So much for wanting the truth!
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman

HOLY CRAP! Pam Bondi just said a Democrat SCREAMED in the briefing because @cspan cameras weren't in there. "They screamed C-SPAN wasn't there, one of them, and then they stormed out of the meeting." Democrats hate it when the limelight isn't given to them for BS chrades.

English
1.1K
5K
17.3K
233.9K
Daractenus
Daractenus@Daractenus·
For the record, the president of the United States is now simultaneously claiming that he has won the war, is currently winning the war, needs help to win the war, and needs no help to win the war. All to destroy the nuclear program he claims to have already destroyed last year.
English
890
25.9K
124.4K
1.9M