lookrio

413 posts

lookrio

lookrio

@Lookrioo

Genetics and Anthropology 📚🧬

Tham gia Şubat 2021
25 Đang theo dõi18 Người theo dõi
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@Malak356775433 I’d confidently call Dilmun and Magan Semitic instead of "other basal Eurasian languages" 💀
English
0
0
0
22
kayos
kayos@israelkayos·
@AfricaFirsts if arabs hadn't invaded egypt, it would have the most insane technology in the world
English
3
0
31
601
Africa First
Africa First@AfricaFirsts·
A 2,000 year old Egyptian mummy discovery whose natural hair is still intact in Egypt 🇪🇬.
Africa First tweet media
English
25
82
504
14.8K
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@PaganTech @Darius1296 @Joe__Bassey Well Eurasian migrations in North Africa dates back to at least 25,000 years, pre dating Neolithic by a lot so by the time green Sahara emerges (12k to 10k BC) North Africa was already mainly inhabited by Natufians and Iberomaurusians
English
0
0
0
3
PaganTech
PaganTech@PaganTech·
@Darius1296 @Lookrioo @Joe__Bassey The first Egyptian Dynasty ruled from roughly 3100 BC to 2900 BC. Paleoclimate and archaeological evidence tells us that, 11,000-5,000 years ago, Sahara was a land covered with vegetation and lakes. Why do you go against science?
English
1
0
0
9
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@FrancosSon3 @HagazagaH So confidently wrong, there’s 0 dna recovered from that irhoud mf so we will never know
English
0
0
0
20
🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps
There are no proofs he did not look like this btw
🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps tweet media🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps tweet media
Ancestral Whispers@Sulkalmakh

Facial reconstruction of a 315,000-year-old man from Morocco The first discovery at the Jebel Irhoud site was made in 1961, when a remarkably complete skull of an archaic human was unearthed. Subsequent excavations revealed another cranial vault, the mandible of a child, and several additional bone fragments. The site has been dated multiple times, with estimates ranging from 30,000 to 190,000 years ago. By 2007, the accepted age was approximately 160,000 years. However, new analyses conducted by the same research team demonstrated that the Jebel Irhoud deposits are significantly older, dating between 240,000 ± 35,000 and 378,000 ± 30,000 years ago, with an average age of approximately 315,000 ± 34,000 years. The Jebel Irhoud individuals occupy an intermediate position between modern humans (including Upper Paleolithic Cro-Magnons) and more archaic groups such as Heidelberg humans, Neanderthals, and African Middle Pleistocene populations. This pattern is evident across nearly all studied anatomical features, including the skull, mandible, brain, and dentition. The occipital and temporal bones of Irhoud 1 retain several archaic characteristics, whereas the frontal bone exhibits more derived traits. The face of Jebel Irhoud 1 is essentially indistinguishable from that of modern humans and, in some respects, appears even more modern than that of certain Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens specimens. The mandible displays a receding chin, although a very weak indication of chin prominence may be present. Considered in isolation, the jaw appears relatively archaic; however, in combination with the facial morphology, it does not seem particularly primitive. Viewed from a three-quarter angle, Irhoud 1 appears remarkably modern, while its archaic features become most apparent in profile. The cranial vault bones of Jebel Irhoud 1 are thick, and the vault itself is low and elongated. The forehead is low and receding, although less sloping than that of European Neanderthals. The brow ridge is massive, postorbital constriction is pronounced, and the occipital region exhibits a chignon-like morphology. The mandibular fossa of the temporal bone is moderately deep and spacious. The articular eminence is well developed, and the postglenoid process is large. The face is extremely high and broad. The upper face is relatively flattened, while alveolar prognathism is strongly expressed. The orbits are tall and square-shaped, and the nose is very broad. A canine fossa is absent, and the alveolar process is high. The teeth are large. The brain morphology resembles that of the Kabwe (Broken Hill) specimen. Cranial capacity has been estimated at 1,305–1,480 cm³. (Hublin et al. (2017), Richter et al. (2017), Antropogenez, S. Drobyshevski (2017)).

English
3
0
33
2.3K
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@WHGCHGANFANE Interesting so G ~ H ~ is you’re guess, I think it’s the most plausible theory as well but I wouldn’t be surprised if they carried other haplogroups too like D E or LT
English
2
2
3
112
King Hermit
King Hermit@WHGCHGANFANE·
Below is my 'theory' / 'hypothesis' on what the potential Y haplogroups of Basal Eurasians were in the information below. Thanks for reading if you do.
King Hermit tweet mediaKing Hermit tweet media
English
7
2
34
2.1K
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@tyler28223 Arameans were so fucking irrelevant during late antiquity it’s hilarious, bro had to post an Arab dynasty
English
0
0
0
345
𝐓𝐲𝐥𝐞𝐫 I 𝑨𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏
At a time when the Middle east wasn't Arab - Emesene edition The Emesene dynasty were a Roman client dynasty of Aramean priest-kings. Iamblichus, the famous Aramean Neoplatonist philosopher of the third century. Iamblichus was also the biographer of the philosopher Pythagoras.
𝐓𝐲𝐥𝐞𝐫 I 𝑨𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏 tweet media𝐓𝐲𝐥𝐞𝐫 I 𝑨𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏 tweet media
English
7
1
19
4.2K
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
6000 retards will look at you dead in the eyes and tell you this is what happened 🤣
lookrio tweet media
English
0
0
0
32
Yusha Al Khazary
Yusha Al Khazary@Al_khazary·
@awmanspider The Muslim Egyptian 9. 4% SSA while the Christian Egyptian 3.6% SSA I never realized that coptics also have SSA and levantine DNA I thought only Muslim Egyptian have levantine DNA
English
2
0
0
287
last night
last night@amineachik2002·
@BantuGenerals funny the Arabs are the second most related population to Ancient Egyptians unlike your primitive race even native Americans are more related to Ancient Egyptians lmao All what a black can do is crimes literally 0 contributions unlike Arabs
English
2
0
1
23
Laškaris ☀️🐏
Laškaris ☀️🐏@LaskarisDvini·
My hunter gatherer/farmer breakdown by @sapphiregnm 35.1% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ​30.0% Zagros Neolithic Farmer ​16.8% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ​12.3% European Hunter-Gatherer ​4.7% Natufian ​1.0% East Asian
Laškaris ☀️🐏 tweet media
English
5
1
31
4.1K
E-V13 slayer
E-V13 slayer@realillyrian668·
Proto-Greeks
English
1
1
20
2K
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@ArabLeft2026 For North Africa it should be depends on your tribe,
English
0
0
0
89
Lezagacy
Lezagacy@lezagacy·
Decided to combine the Yamnaya Core samples on AADR v66 and calculate proportions. the UNHG/N admixed samples are almost entirely under I-M233.
Lezagacy tweet mediaLezagacy tweet media
English
6
8
64
3.8K