Robecuba

@SirDarfsAlot @dhkatz_ @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 No, you're saying that "faster" must mean speed when I'm saying that faster can mean time. Definitions aren't prescriptive, and these are literally two definitions of the word faster. A 10-second video finishes faster than a 15-second video, even if they play at the same speed.

@RRobecuba @dhkatz_ @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 That's not the same thing tho. Your arguing a point while actually arguing a completely different point. There's no "interpreting" you just dont know the basic difference between opposite gravitational pulls and a single gravitational pull

Technically, don’t they, though? Just by an immeasurably small difference?

@SirDarfsAlot @dhkatz_ @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 We're just interpreting "falling faster" differently. You're measuring falling speed, I'm measuring how long it takes until the objects collide. In this way, the heavier object does indeed fall "faster." Not speed-wise, but time-wise.

@dhkatz_ @RRobecuba @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 yea but ur not measuring falling speed your measuring gravitational pull. so whats the point of arguing that no one is talking about that thats not the conversation at all

@PrideOfHumility @theblessedsalt The resulting acceleration for the object is the same, but a heavier object causes Earth to move ever so slightly as well, resulting in a very, very, very minute difference in time spent falling. The heavier object does indeed hit the ground ever so slightly faster.

@theblessedsalt From what I have been told, as i have not performed the actual experiments myself, no. More mass means more matter has to absorb all the extra kinetic energy granted by spatial interaction in a gravity well, so the resulting speed is the same, barring friction differences.

@SirDarfsAlot @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 This isn't 100% precise because of the differing sizes, but you get the point. More precisely, a grain of sand and a Venus-mass grain of sand that for some reason isn't a black hole. Or, you know, a bowling ball and a Venus-mass bowling ball.

@SirDarfsAlot @theblessedsalt @CathBibliophile @RobertWeidner11 Think about a grain of sand and the Earth in a vacuum 1000 km away and Venus and the Earth in a vacuum 1000 km away. Venus and the Earth will collide earlier; from the Earth's perspective, Venus "fell" faster.

@airynne @hcorvinNYC @bumbadum14 The other graph also shows a jump for both candidates. The red line is behind the blue one in the graph precisely because it jumps up--you would see it further down if it didn't.

@hcorvinNYC @RRobecuba @bumbadum14 These graphs show jumps in vote counts for both party candidates. These are normal looking graphs.

You’re totally unreasonable if you think going to sleep and Trump having a super majority, then waking up the day after Election Day and: - every swing state suddenly froze their counting - multiple key swing counties had various catastrophic events - every polling station boarded windows to prevent media oversight - this fucking graph

@hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 These are also from the 2020 election

@RRobecuba @airynne @bumbadum14 Exactly - when are those from? What they show is exactly what would be expected when the red candidate is, for real, running ahead. And it proves beyond reasonable doubts that "red spikes" happen too when red counties release results.

@airynne @hcorvinNYC @bumbadum14

@hcorvinNYC @bumbadum14 And yet we’ve never seen a graph look like that before. I’m not saying it’s not possible but statistically it looks suspect and people who won’t acknowledge that are also suspect to me.

@Name03813069 @dgrabina @RichardBSpencer @PermaBull2024 Anyways, my point without AI is that there's no reason to try to sound smart by calling something that's not an ad hom an ad hom when you can just call it a useless comment (which it was) and save yourself the posturing, usage of Latin you don't know, and extra typing time

@Name03813069 @dgrabina @RichardBSpencer @PermaBull2024 Erm grok make my point for me please 🤓 I guess I can do that too. Learn what an ad hom actually is and argue based on that instead of getting Grok to do your thinking for you bucko

@Dastardly001 @MicahNieman @HazelAppleyard Skydivers typically ascend slowly. If you are teleported up 20,000 feet randomly, all the gas inside your body would expand instantly as the pressure drops to just under half of typical atmospheric pressure. Your eardrums would likely rupture and you might even get the bends.

@MicahNieman @HazelAppleyard Yeah I'm not seeing any downsides to this

NO.

@BanksChnl @TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Why does this get the half-ass excuse of "that's a state matter" and not voter ID itself?

That’s a state matter, sir. My state has programs to help with access for those who are low income (little to no fees), not just an ID, but car registration as well. The amount of troll accounts, bots, & paid info-ops on this site are making it almost unusable. Or perhaps you left this comment & were serious about it.. if so, woof 😮‍💨.

Dear Chuck Schumer, Hi. Black dude here. I can trace my family ancestry to slavery. I even know where they were slaves. My mom experienced Jim Crow. I think I’ve watched every episode of “Eyes On the Prize” when I was younger. With that said… Can you directly explain to me how the SAVE Act is “Jim Crow 2.0?” Literally every black person I know has ID. Literally every black person I know has a car or at least a ride. Literally every black person I know knows how to vote (well… except the ones with felonies… but they don’t count). With your advanced white liberal thinking, you must know more than me. Apparently, as I experience daily on this app, white liberals are experts on being black; even more so than actual black folks. Perhaps you could explain it like I’m five. I’d look it up on the internet, but Kathy Hochul has already told me I don’t know what a computer is and Joe Biden said I can’t navigate it, anyway. Looking forward to your answer. No hugs. Zeek

@TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Top 10 dumbest responses on this website holy shit

@RRobecuba @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Curing?!!!! How liberal

@TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Oh, and of course, a clause allowing for voting without said ID and curing your ballot after the fact.

@TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Then it should be very easily to implement a clause in the SAVE act that guarantees easily accessible and free Voter ID for all citizens. I, and I'm sure enough Democrats to pass the bill, would support it then.

@TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham I too disagree with the D's handling of the situation and think they should be pushing for accessible ID (and should've implemented it earlier), but that's not here and now. You can make sure voters are citizens after making sure that citizens can easily prove it. Not before.

@RRobecuba @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham To make sure voters are citizens eligible to vote instead of “trust us bro “ democrats who could have released the files and not let millions of illegal aliens into our country

@TheCowboyCamp @georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Making voting IDs accessible needs to be done FIRST before making it a requirement to vote. Why in the world would we accept a "trust me bro" from the "Don't release the Epstein files" party that ID would be made accessible later?

@georgefoohoolio @BanksChnl @Detroitboss_RRP @ZeekArkham Why are democrats not advocating for honest elections. We will gladly vote for a bill to make voting ids accessible and verified. That’s literally all we want.

@cdspice @Detroitboss_RRP @KaBoomix @ZeekArkham I'm not sure where you live that you need to use an ID for just about everything. I've used my ID in the past year to drive, enter a casino, and fly. That's it. Is it really that hard to imagine that there are plenty, plenty of people who do no activities that require ID?

@Detroitboss_RRP @KaBoomix @ZeekArkham This was probably true 26 years ago. But since then everyone born in the US is given a SSN at birth, and you need an ID for just about everything, this is no longer true and only someone going for deception would use a 26 year old census with at least two newer ones.

@LilContrarian @jackngangster @loser_town_ @reddit_lies Bro I'm reading this thread back and I actually thought that the (1/11) was a joke but this dude deadass wrote a whole thread about Hamas when the conversation was about Iran LMAOO

@jackngangster @loser_town_ @reddit_lies Whoa, we're going full off topic now, are we? Can't I just say that bombing a school is bad? Like, why is that controversial?

The retard is back