Savage Rodent

659 posts

Savage Rodent banner
Savage Rodent

Savage Rodent

@SavageRodent

It's the mark of an educated mind to entertain an idea without accepting it. Youtube: https://t.co/gRs9Od0ipq

Tham gia Kasım 2017
80 Đang theo dõi36 Người theo dõi
Elise 🍒🍒♱
Elise 🍒🍒♱@AdolphsonFalkk·
@SavageRodent He's never lived in a city 😭 unfortunately you only need WiFi to troon out nowadays 💔
English
1
0
11
82
Elise 🍒🍒♱
Elise 🍒🍒♱@AdolphsonFalkk·
I have an old friend that I hadn't seen in years that trooned out 1.5 years ago but I saw him recently and the only difference is that he has longer hair and weighs more now
Elise 🍒🍒♱ tweet media
English
16
0
103
860
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@defenestrat1ons Well I know one thing, I'd definitely not want them to have access to the internet. And I think boredom and getting into trouble are good parts about childhood. I'd also only want to expose them to retro games if they had an interest in video games. idk it's all a far away dream
English
1
0
1
16
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@KitsuneMizuki Well men would go to the physical stressful jobs if they had a loving loyal wife who he started a family with, which the majority don't. So they check out of society, and the death spiral just continues.
English
0
0
1
90
Mizuki☄️
Mizuki☄️@KitsuneMizuki·
I talked about this already, this is being made on purpose to make it even more difficult to form couples then family. x.com/PlisskenPatrio… Men will need to flock more and more to types of jobs that are more physically stressing, and these, even tho sometimes can pay even more than the ones women are taking in, are not perceived by women as positions of status making these men invisible to relationship. Women will keep fighting more and more bluntly for the fewer men holding positions of status since all the others are not an option anymore.
LT Jonathan Kendrick@PlisskenPatriot

What’s going on with men? Oh you mean when you made it illegal to hire us?

English
12
15
195
3.2K
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@ObviousRises Bravo sir. We could have done without the mentioning of wonderbread, but nothing is perfect.
GIF
English
0
0
0
39
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
Trust me nobody wants me to pull out the actual data 90% of men when not given age—rate the most attractive women on average at exactly 15, women grow faster than men and stop developing around 16 (so this part isn't crazy) but it gets worse: studies have consistently found that *I'm a different person when the horny hits* (the meme) is actually a thing in real life, they've tested before/after being aroused and what they consistently found (between both genders) is that when people are horny their morality goes from "iron-clad" to (morality is just a suggestion) completely utterly normal people were found to go form saying "I would strongly never x y z" to "fantasizing about a niece" (whose underage) now everyone thinks they are morally superior and to be fair it is a contentious topic to study but in my view the most important data point/finding was this: when given ages all the guys just said "18" which as we know—makes sense if you realize they are lying/conditioned, otherwise, why would they rate "18" even not knowing ages? (Just to be clear because these days people lack literacy: nothing I'm discussing here has anything to do or not to do with my own opinions/preferences/beliefs, I am simply approaching this issue from an academic standpoint.) Don't think women are from this, its only lately that female teachers who commit statutory rape with minors (or worse) are even being punished/recognized as a problem in society, all these women that would bash over liking a younger adult female, how many of them were the same women gushing over Justin Beiber when he rose on the scene? I haven't forgotten the utter shamelessness of these ADULT women lusting over a god damn underage boy, the data on this scarce only because nobody wants to touch the subject study or even understand, but amongst the few case studies/literature you can find I can only derive ONE conclusion—most (not all) people are full of shit, its just a matter of how much. I am hardline Free Speech because for years, over a decade now I have consistently warned that the Slippery Slope is real, look at Visa and MasterCard trying to ban EVERYTHING adult/explicit, look at the UK arrested people over video games or anime merchandise, I don't care how moral people say they are (or aren't or are) I'm not FREAKING worried about fiction, media or things that don't exist, I worry about REAL problems and REAL issues. My point with all this is a lot of people are full of shit or just projecting or whatever, I really don't care, people are perverts, humans are by nature a little aberrant compared to the animal kingdom, we don't have mating seasons, for most mammals even this is unusual, in fact its probably the reason Homo Sapiens Sapiens was able to conquer the planet and outmatch/breed/absorb all the other hominid species. (Neanderthals being a good example, they are gone, we have their DNA) In other words, humans are very horny, but that doesn't mean every weirdo is the issue, nor does it mean we need to ban everything just because SOME people have issues. We don't ban cars because of drunk of drivers, (smart people) don't want guns banned just because of a few gangbangers, really think about this—when in all of history has it ever been a idea to ban something "immoral" that is not actually something that ought to be "illegal" for its own sake? The prohibition is one of the best examples I can think of, it didn't stop shit, in fact it made things way worse. There are two kinds of people: 1) Perverts (scale goes from "normie" tier to "art that would make the angels cry" or land you in a penitentiary if anyone saw, or just wonderbread) 2) Clinical (these are the people worth people concerned about) I'm not just taking anime or "lolita" I'm talking ANYTHING that is a clinical obsession. People throw around the word "PDF" so much its has begun to lost all meaning, much like the word "Nazi" however medically speaking its NOT lusting after school girls (this is a problem) but it is a UNIVERSE different than if someone says they are only attracted to (I don't even feel comfortable typing these things) certain things which 100% cross the line into illness. The white woman who is only interested in Dogs is just as clinical as the fat weeb who is ONLY interested in characters that have the red backpacks in Japan (google it), both these things are are pretty bad—luckily they are a minority. The issue comes with definitions and abusing language to push their political agendas or "morality" if we're talking about raw percentages (and keep in mind its been a while since I seen the literature (or had access to university journals) but I'd say a majority of the population are either "normal" or perverted, and a very very very small minority are clinical (people who ONLY can get off to one thing), is there overlap between the groups and crimes? Sure. Absolutely but its not nearly as bad as someone like asmongold makes it out to be. Now what IS extremely common amongst both groups all data on the few studies anyone is willing to do about it, when people do not know ages, MOST PEOPLE (and I mean most) find teens (to varying degrees usually older is more common) attractive at least *sometimes* if not consistently, this gets lumped in with PDFs (which again has made it more and more meaningless) now a days you're a PDF if you are 21 and go on a date with an 18 year old, and people are trying to ban fictional characters while actual human trafficking, grooming gangs, real predators and real issues go completely ignored by keyboard warriors and moral busybodies. In other words, that's actually (if we're actually using words properly here) pretty "normal" aka common aka the average *most* (or "often") of the time. I am not defending or condemning this necessarily, these are simply—facts. So yes. Normal people distinguishing between and reality, and if you can't tell the difference, you meet the literal definition of someone in psychosis and you are being psychotic, 90% of antis and tourists literally don't even have real beliefs, they are just products of their environment, culture and time, lots of the people reading this have/had grandparents who when the Farmboy/husband was like 28, your Grandma at the time was like 16 or some shit and such marriages often lasted entire lifetimes—now a days people are getting married well into middle-age (30ish) and getting divorces left and right. I'm not saying that "the trad way" is necessarily better or worse (nor am I saying its a good idea these days) but what I am saying is that nobody *really* knows what they are F*CKING talking about when they take these hardline moral stances THEY DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT, BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE ARE NPCs!!! I am not talking about THIS issue just, I am talking about LITERALLY ANYTHING these days. People are so uninformed—asmon (no offense Zack you're alright in my book) being one of the worse offenders half the time. (with half of asmons takes I often think "you know I don't think he's fully informed on this issue I bet if he had more data or knew about x y z study/example maybe he'd change his mind bit) I know reading is gay and lame but *someone* has to do it, don't shoot the messenger. Long story short there's a reason I tend to rarely open my mouth form an academic perspective and have to choose every word carefully as to not be misconstrued, most people don't really know what they're talking about half the time, and I find that pretty disturbing in the same way I find it disturbing that people with IQs less than 100 are allowed to vote, much less ignorant people (not all women for example but—) are allowed to vote. These are my thoughts on the issue, I will likely leave it at that, before you post angry or retarded applies I require you to answer the question first (post what you think the answer is, and THEN type what you want): Which came first, the chicken or the egg? There are multiple correct answers and many wrong ones, if you fail the test I will not take your response seriously, if you pass the test, I will consider you at least 100 IQ (or better). Anyways yeah, long story short tl;dr the data says that there is little to zero connection between liking anime/even weird anime shit like "lolita" and actual real world crimes, the same sway the studies say there is ZERO CONNECTION between violence school shootings crime and violent video games, its LITERALLY the same. NOTE: If there is one thing you take from this understand that people like us won the Free Speech debate the moment the UK (basically existed) and the moment Visa and Mastercard proved us right. FICTION is NOT REAL. FOCUS on REAL issues. Because you cannot give an INCH, when it comes to FREE SPEECH, it is THAT simple. If violent video games don't cause school shootings, some people being a little perverted anime school girls has NO CORRELATION to real world crimes. I rest my case.
Emerald Apple@AI_EmeraldApple

Another Asmongold L, as he doubles down on the anti-logic again. As many have said, the data on this is actually clear from multiple studies where there is no difference. Normal people distinguish the difference between fiction and reality. The authorities and the researchers TRIED to find that difference because they wanted a justification to criminalize loli content, and yet they could not. For some reason, on this topic, he refuses to look at the data and just goes with his own "internal morality" based on the same "moral panic" he is critical of.

English
35
38
457
31.5K
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@whirlybirby @rozendollmasacr I suppose there's a possibility of that looking through some previous posts. She seems to lack a desire to understand and is more self-centered. Whether she realizes that and changes is up to her I suppose.
English
1
0
1
7
Whirly
Whirly@whirlybirby·
@SavageRodent @rozendollmasacr She's also being insensitive. She's dismissing the needs of men while touting her own. That's not fair to them. You can't have a relationship where you only focus on your own needs and dismiss those of your partner entirely.
English
1
0
1
8
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@ShitpostRock2 I mean I don't think the dialogue is the same in REmake4 compared to the OG RE4 either. I just hope REmakeV has the same gameplay as REmake2 at the very least.
English
0
0
0
348
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@VictoriaKotkaPL I'm assuming it's a man you're interested in, so why not just look for opportunities to talk to him? If you're wanting him to make the first move, well unfortunately that's going to be rather difficult to make happen considering the society we live in today.
English
0
0
7
88
Victoria
Victoria@VictoriaKotkaPL·
what do I do to get a man's attention
English
26
0
21
1.3K
Zerø
Zerø@zeromoder·
A cheater invaded me in Dark Souls 2 and I still managed to kill them LMAO
English
6
1
49
1.1K
MoonTrigger
MoonTrigger@dragontroopbeta·
@SavageRodent @OtakuEspiritu Yeah, I think only when there is probable cause for real world harm is it an issue. That child will grow up knowing they've been drawn. I think loli is creepy and weird but illegality would be a thought crime IMO.
English
1
0
3
32
Espiritu
Espiritu@OtakuEspiritu·
I love how Asmongold makes the first tweet in this thread, saying "Please provide the data you're referencing," but then makes the most "feelings" post with no data to back it up other than "Just a trend I came up with in my head." Again, Asmongold wants to bitch and cry about bad faith points, but then does the very same thing."Oh, you like Hestia from DanMachi? Oh, so you want to fuck kids in real life then..." That's how I read your tweet. For a guy who claims he uses common sense all the time, I actually wish you would use some common sense for once. I'm just disappointed in you.
Espiritu tweet media
English
127
209
2.7K
39.4K
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@dragontroopbeta @OtakuEspiritu That's a grey area, and that's where I think discussion more so should be, since people are going to think differently. I believe it crosses the line. Yes it's art and it's still fiction, but when that fiction is based on an individual, that's where I think the line is crossed.
English
1
0
1
29
MoonTrigger
MoonTrigger@dragontroopbeta·
@SavageRodent @OtakuEspiritu Genuine question, what do you think about the case of that one artist who made hentai that resembled KeemStar's daughter (underage by about 10 years iirc) intentionally? I think that crosses your line. Am I right?
English
1
0
0
88
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@rozendollmasacr The challenges women face when looking for a SO are different, since there's usually an abundance of men showing interest and the woman has to pick. Men are reliant on the woman picking them out of a crowd, and that's it. Like it or not, that's just how it is.
English
0
0
2
989
Savage Rodent
Savage Rodent@SavageRodent·
@FairytailGirlOF Not to mention it's simply a fact that beautiful people, fiction or not, are liked more. And I think everyone wants likable characters in fiction. When I think about this, I'm always surprised it's such a controversial take.
English
0
0
2
43
FairytaleGirl
FairytaleGirl@FairytailGirlOF·
videogames are a form of escapism. i am a woman. if im playing a videogame with a female protagonist, i want her to look pretty, sexy and beautiful. if i wanted to play as an ugly woman, i would stick to the real life
English
157
166
2.3K
46.3K