MR. OBVIOUS

25.6K posts

MR. OBVIOUS banner
MR. OBVIOUS

MR. OBVIOUS

@ObviousRises

Commentary, News and Dank Memes. Official fan account. Follow/Subscribe. YouTube: https://t.co/DXzWPM3URc

YouTube Katılım Haziran 2022
689 Takip Edilen57.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
This is my political philosophy.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
148
375
4.4K
0
Tired
Tired@tiredortired·
@ObviousRises > mixtape > shows a cd This game is made by retards
English
2
1
24
317
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
Wait this is Mixtape? Its actually real? This isn't a joke? Holy cringe, talk about a nepobaby woke white girl game. "Oh no I live in a predominately white safe beautiful suburb—I want to live in the BIG CITY where white girls are STABBED to death on busses its so DYNAMIC."
English
39
53
905
19.4K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@bvdemier I might legitimately play and review the "game" I legitimately couldn't stop laughing.
English
2
0
4
153
bert bvdemier
bert bvdemier@bvdemier·
@ObviousRises I would advice you to watch the whole stream(of you can find it). The entire thing is like this.
English
2
0
4
309
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@GigaChudTV I get what she (the nepobaby) whose billionaire parents funded this 'game' is trying to do, she's trying to do slam poetry, as a... natural poet, it legitimately the worst thing I have ever heard.
English
1
0
8
227
GigaChudTV
GigaChudTV@GigaChudTV·
@ObviousRises "daddyyyyyy, if you trap me here itll ooooooooonly be the beginnings of my wicked ways!" *double dramatic guitar riffs* who tf talks like this?
English
3
0
26
560
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@Sabrecobra Ah man, the 90s were the last glimpse of the American dream. A pound of beef jerky for like $5 dollars. We truly were betrayed, our entire future was stolen.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
0
0
14
279
Sabrecobra
Sabrecobra@Sabrecobra·
@ObviousRises This is suppose to be set in 1995 by the way, this sperg out would never happen in the 90s and her dad would have slapped the taste out of her mouth for such disrespect...😂
English
2
0
35
609
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@basedkletus I understand where you are coming from, but race doesn't guarantee superiority, as far as I'm concerned what matters is individual IQ, currently amongst ALL races on Earth brain size and average IQ are dropping (reverse-Flynn effect) we lost natural selection, science can fix it.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
1
0
4
191
Kletus 🤍✝️🇺🇸
How dare Chud think the 5% are bad just because of the actions of the other 95%. No, at this point if it's a black and a White I'm on the White side period. I couldn't care less about context at this point as the non Whites never do either. We go tribal or extinct, those are the options. Stop pretending like every person is equal, it's not true.
English
1
2
21
294
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
Let me explain why asmongold is right that Chud The Builder acted in Self-Defense. First lets make one thing clear: Chudthebuilder is 100% an asshole streamer and provocateur. THAT BEING SAID. When he was attacked he was walking away. The black guy punched him in the back of the head (mind you this is the thinnest part of the skull) punches to the head can be (and have been) 100% lethal, so he defended himself, shot the guy ONCE (I would have mag dumped) even tho the black dude (despite being shot) literally kept punching and fighting him—what do you think his intentions were if he had not been shot? He would have tried to kill Chud, already that's Self-Defense. BUT WAIT—DERE'S MORE! A lot of people are throwing around legal terms they don't understand, "provocation" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free-card its literally an legal argument, one usually to talk down a charge (like assault which the black guy did) to a lower level, let me explain why this is ultimately a self-defense situation. Chud was attacked, AFTER, he was actively walking away (Chud also never committed any violence) in legal terms this is known as de-escalation and it is the GOLD STANDARD for Judges to determine fault, do you know why its NOT provocation in this case? Even if he was saying mean words or asking "Are you gonna chimp out?" (tbh lets be real words still don't justify violence) the LEGAL DEFINITION of provocation basically requires that a person acts in the HEAT OF THE MOMENT. Had the black guy attacked him WHILE Chud was talking shit (to his face) THAT would be provocation but he didn't, he didn't act on impulse—he waited for Chud to have his back turned/his guard down so he could sucker punch him (like a weak pathetic coward) that shows premeditation and intent. Now lets talk about reasonable force/restraint, both of these matter legally, A LOT. Despite having every right to fear for his life (he had no way of knowing if he would be gang assaulted) he defended himself by firing ONE TIME, he showed both reasonable force to defend himself and restraint, despite the black guy assaulting him (assaulting him) the entire time—both are important in establishing Self-Defense. (depending on the state) Let me sum this up. Words are not illegal. Its called Free Speech for a reason. It doesn't give you legal justification to do violence, but even if we pretended it did, Chud was the victim the moment he walked and got attacked from behind. NOTHING. ELSE. MATTERS. (including any previous social media posts) because of the circumstances, I actually a wrote a whole post about Black culture and their version of "Izzat" very recently, and why they often turn and resort to such lethal violence. #1 thing from that post: If you have seen ANY clips online of fights in the black community you know that they do not show restraint, they stomp on heads after someone is knocked out/basically show ZERO restraint. THE ONLY PEOPLE SAYING THAT CHUD SHOULDN'T HAVE SHOT OVER A PUNCH LITERALLY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT BLACK CULTURE AND WOULD 100% DIE IF THEY FOLLOWED THEIR OWN ADVICE—IRONICALLY THESE ARE SHELTERED LIBERALS/NEOTARDS WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN HAD A SINGLE BLACK FRIEND AND PROBABLY GREW UP IN A RICH/WHITE NEIGHBORHOOD. Is Chud an asshole? Yes. Is he Racist? Probably. And although I can sympathize with his frustration (black-on-white crime is INSANELY high, 5x higher that white-on-black crime, 25x higher per capita) he's COMPLETELY unjustified in treating all black people the same—believe it or not, not every person of ANY group, are all bad. But here's the thing, being an ass, saying mean words, hell even be "le reecist" IS. NOT. ILLEGAL, this isn't the UK where recently (100% true story) police literally ARRESTED and handcuffed a DYING MAN who was BLEEDING to death after a Sikh (Indian) migrant claimed (didn't prove) the white man called him a slur—he literally died because they arrested him instead of calling an ambulance. Obviously they will 100% try to make this a political/race thing and throw the book at him because he's white (meanwhile they keep releasing black repeat offenders who attack/SA/murder white people) but make no mistake, if Chud goes to prison this sets a HORRIFIC precedent—basically anyone is allowed to kill anyone over mean words, just lie and say you were called a slur, I hate to use this phrase (it makes me uncomfortable) but if you wanted an actual "race" war, that is how you get one. at the end of the day asmongold is right, if someone tries to physically assault you, you should be able to shoot them, regardless of race or mean words, its that simple
English
54
50
416
11K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@ItsKagiVids @ChibiReviews That's a great idea actually. Right now its just BS, "muh climate change" "muh mrna jab" which tbh is super dangerous to be pushing medical shit on people despite not being doctors.
English
0
0
2
29
Kagi
Kagi@ItsKagiVids·
@ChibiReviews YouTube really needs its own version of community notes.
English
3
0
36
1.2K
Chibi Reviews
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews·
Its come to my attention he reuploaded the hit-piece video. He had to hide the original because of all the dislikes and comments
Chibi Reviews tweet media
English
96
185
2.5K
46.5K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@largashburr @Idontexistalr @ChibiReviews speaking of there is currently user on KF using illegal tool to mass dox Chibi and "conservative" content creators using illegal tools that operate on the dark web, I seriously think that website has long since crossed the line, they won't stop, even if they get someone killed
English
1
1
3
28
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@Idontexistalr @ChibiReviews Yup, he's showing his true colors. This is completely an aside but—even if I gave him benefit of the doubt (I don't) this is why YouTubers should just write/make their content, I personally find it cringe to "hire a whole crew" to make their YouTube videos, its utter narcissism.
English
0
0
5
85
Zeroslost
Zeroslost@Idontexistalr·
@ChibiReviews Unironically re-uploading the video and acting like it never received backlash beforehand is wild. That guy is genuinely so scummy, it's awful.
English
4
7
430
4.5K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@ChibiReviews Plus he still kept all the disingenuous implications and insinuations, I personally am not a fan of drama tubers, they thrive on ruined lives, and in many cases—ruining lives. I'd just LOVE to know more about him and HIS secrets and skeletons, I'm very curious about him.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
0
0
26
554
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@ChibiReviews Because they never cared if the posts were true, they just hate you, they hate us, they want us dead, they lie about us, they use any justification, they go insane over bullshit like anime (projection) and never EVER give a shit about real world issues, they are just sociopaths.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
1
1
34
554
Chibi Reviews
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews·
I want it to be known, I'd let things go if people honestly apologized, but we know individuals are too prideful for that Showing accountability in the 2020s seems to be a foreign concept to many
English
28
46
832
8.1K
CuteAndFunny💢ᵃˡᵗ
CuteAndFunny💢ᵃˡᵗ@CuteAndFunnyAlt·
for anyone that is unsubscribing, you can follow me instead 🤭
CuteAndFunny💢ᵃˡᵗ tweet media
English
48
60
1.6K
16.9K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@0hour1 The black guy attacked him from behind while Chud was walking away. Do I need to explain why thats self-defense. Fuck plea deals. He shot once. He showed restraint. Even tho the black kept punching attacking him despite being shot. His plan to kill chud, he premeditated.
English
1
2
52
355
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
The top defense attorney said proportionality will be Chud's downfall, and he would not defend him in a self-defense case. He goes on to say Chud would be best to make a deal and downgrade charges.
English
114
8
221
21.5K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@Morrigan_Astro Oh I get the joke, if that guy had succeeding in killing Chud they'd released him so he could again, because apparently black on white crime is 100% okay but don't dare you defend yourself, don't you just love Democrat/liberal Judges and woke white women? There's gonna be a war.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
0
0
2
83
Astro Morrigan ♀⚡️
Astro Morrigan ♀⚡️@Morrigan_Astro·
Chud the builder is low IQ and does not understand the consequences of his behavior and actions. Therefore he should be set free. He’s not legally mentally sane, therefore, he should be freed immediately at bare minimum given probation, or maybe gone into a mental institution because it is unfair to charge him as if he was a mentally competent, sane adult. #freechud
English
306
177
2.4K
37.8K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@OtakuEspiritu >calls himself "chud killer" (cringe af) >his pfp has Eliot autistic rodger This is the average caliber of people trying to "kill us" and insulting us/calling us names, bro has to be trolling, its just too cringe.
English
0
0
20
383
Gene Parmesan
Gene Parmesan@dsonoiki·
lawyer here Chud the Builder will get off on self defense too long to explain
English
388
97
4.3K
109.3K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@ChiefWoky @dsonoiki When he was attacked he was walking away and had his back turned to the guy who sneak attacked him from behind, there is no universe where you can say "Oh he was threatening by holding his gun in its holster" when the dude literally was WALKING AWAY.
English
1
0
2
17
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@dsonoiki OH BOI I LITERALLY JUST FINISHED A LONG ASS POST EXPLAINING WHY ITS LEGALLY JUSTIFIED SELF-DEFENSE AND NOT PROVOCATION, YO DROPPING THE POST. x.com/ObviousRises/s…
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises

Let me explain why asmongold is right that Chud The Builder acted in Self-Defense. First lets make one thing clear: Chudthebuilder is 100% an asshole streamer and provocateur. THAT BEING SAID. When he was attacked he was walking away. The black guy punched him in the back of the head (mind you this is the thinnest part of the skull) punches to the head can be (and have been) 100% lethal, so he defended himself, shot the guy ONCE (I would have mag dumped) even tho the black dude (despite being shot) literally kept punching and fighting him—what do you think his intentions were if he had not been shot? He would have tried to kill Chud, already that's Self-Defense. BUT WAIT—DERE'S MORE! A lot of people are throwing around legal terms they don't understand, "provocation" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free-card its literally an legal argument, one usually to talk down a charge (like assault which the black guy did) to a lower level, let me explain why this is ultimately a self-defense situation. Chud was attacked, AFTER, he was actively walking away (Chud also never committed any violence) in legal terms this is known as de-escalation and it is the GOLD STANDARD for Judges to determine fault, do you know why its NOT provocation in this case? Even if he was saying mean words or asking "Are you gonna chimp out?" (tbh lets be real words still don't justify violence) the LEGAL DEFINITION of provocation basically requires that a person acts in the HEAT OF THE MOMENT. Had the black guy attacked him WHILE Chud was talking shit (to his face) THAT would be provocation but he didn't, he didn't act on impulse—he waited for Chud to have his back turned/his guard down so he could sucker punch him (like a weak pathetic coward) that shows premeditation and intent. Now lets talk about reasonable force/restraint, both of these matter legally, A LOT. Despite having every right to fear for his life (he had no way of knowing if he would be gang assaulted) he defended himself by firing ONE TIME, he showed both reasonable force to defend himself and restraint, despite the black guy assaulting him (assaulting him) the entire time—both are important in establishing Self-Defense. (depending on the state) Let me sum this up. Words are not illegal. Its called Free Speech for a reason. It doesn't give you legal justification to do violence, but even if we pretended it did, Chud was the victim the moment he walked and got attacked from behind. NOTHING. ELSE. MATTERS. (including any previous social media posts) because of the circumstances, I actually a wrote a whole post about Black culture and their version of "Izzat" very recently, and why they often turn and resort to such lethal violence. #1 thing from that post: If you have seen ANY clips online of fights in the black community you know that they do not show restraint, they stomp on heads after someone is knocked out/basically show ZERO restraint. THE ONLY PEOPLE SAYING THAT CHUD SHOULDN'T HAVE SHOT OVER A PUNCH LITERALLY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT BLACK CULTURE AND WOULD 100% DIE IF THEY FOLLOWED THEIR OWN ADVICE—IRONICALLY THESE ARE SHELTERED LIBERALS/NEOTARDS WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN HAD A SINGLE BLACK FRIEND AND PROBABLY GREW UP IN A RICH/WHITE NEIGHBORHOOD. Is Chud an asshole? Yes. Is he Racist? Probably. And although I can sympathize with his frustration (black-on-white crime is INSANELY high, 5x higher that white-on-black crime, 25x higher per capita) he's COMPLETELY unjustified in treating all black people the same—believe it or not, not every person of ANY group, are all bad. But here's the thing, being an ass, saying mean words, hell even be "le reecist" IS. NOT. ILLEGAL, this isn't the UK where recently (100% true story) police literally ARRESTED and handcuffed a DYING MAN who was BLEEDING to death after a Sikh (Indian) migrant claimed (didn't prove) the white man called him a slur—he literally died because they arrested him instead of calling an ambulance. Obviously they will 100% try to make this a political/race thing and throw the book at him because he's white (meanwhile they keep releasing black repeat offenders who attack/SA/murder white people) but make no mistake, if Chud goes to prison this sets a HORRIFIC precedent—basically anyone is allowed to kill anyone over mean words, just lie and say you were called a slur, I hate to use this phrase (it makes me uncomfortable) but if you wanted an actual "race" war, that is how you get one. at the end of the day asmongold is right, if someone tries to physically assault you, you should be able to shoot them, regardless of race or mean words, its that simple

English
3
3
30
860