MAM 🀄️

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

我一直是特朗普总统及其加密友好政策的坚定支持者。 作为World Liberty Financial的早期支持者，我在项目初期投入了大量资金，因为我相信该项目向公众展示的愿景：一个促进金融自由、去除中介、将去中心化金融的福祉带给普通民众的DeFi平台。 然而，从未有人向我或任何投资者披露的是：World Liberty在部署WLFI代币的智能合约中暗植了一个后门黑名单功能。该功能赋予公司单方面的权力，可以在无需通知、无需理由、无需救济途径的情况下，冻结、限制乃至实质没收任何代币持有者的财产权利。 这是去中心化的反面。这是一扇伪装成大门的陷阱。 我在此谴责WLFI内部不良行为者持续制造的代币丑闻。 我是第一个也是最大的受害者——早在2025年，他们就非法将我的WLFI代币钱包列入黑名单，这一行为违反了基本的投资者权利和区块链的公平原则。 WLFI团队所采取的一切行为——从用户身上榨取费用、秘密植入后门控制用户资产、在未经披露和正当程序的情况下冻结投资者资金、将加密社区当作个人提款机——所有这些行为都是不正当的，从未经过任何公平、透明、善意的社区治理程序授权。 那些被援引来为上述行为正名的治理投票，并非通过公平或透明的程序进行。关键信息对投票者隐瞒，实质性的参与受到限制，结果早已预定。这些投票代表的不是社区的意志——而是设计它们的人的意志。 这些行为与我无关。与那些相信该项目承诺的投资者无关。我们以最强烈的态度反对上述每一项行为。 WLFI团队的所作所为正在侵蚀社区对项目的信任。解锁代币，维护对社区的透明。让我们以诚信建设，而非以不端行事。