Transcending Terra

Janet Ossenbaard was murdered over her work. I remember watching this as it came out. It's heavy, and part of me had a difficult time processing the information, but I did over time. If you haven't seen this docuseries, watch it. It's missing the introduction, but it trickles out through each part. (Start at the bottom) 👇 rumble.com/user/FallCabal…

@LionessInMOtion They should all be arrested.

How much money do you think was invested to pull off the “NoKings Protest”?… and by whom???… Imagine the good that could’ve been funded if those monies were redirected elsewhere…

@parkerjb_007 @JakeCan72 Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), Public Law 99-603. uscis.gov This act amended the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by adding Section 274A, which is codified in the U.S. Code as 8 U.S.C. § 1324a ("Unlawful employment of aliens")

@TranscendingT @JakeCan72 Since when did employers have to verify citizenship? A couple decades ago, yeah. But that changed to employers weren’t allowed to check. Prohibited.

An undocumented Peruvian immigrant lied about his legal status on his Lyft driver application. Lyft approved him. He put a fake rideshare decal on his car and patrolled SoMa — targeting women leaving nightclubs alone on Howard and Second Street. Locked the doors. Drove them to isolated locations. Four victims. Crimes from 2013 to 2018. The first report sat cold for five years until a DNA match identified him in 2018. Convicted on 11 felony counts. More than 100 years to life. San Francisco’s sanctuary policy prohibits local law enforcement from coordinating with ICE on immigration status. The lie on the Lyft application was never anyone’s job to catch. The first victim reported this in 2013.

Check this out.

We don't need doctors with egos so big that they can never be questioned or wrong. We need doctors that are willing and open to learn outside of the box. Unfortunately, it seems most fall into the first category...

Yup. Donald Trump just pulled the curtain back. Now we see who actually stands with us… and who just likes having us on standby like a global credit card. If allies aren’t backing us when it counts, then what exactly are we paying for with NATO? Loyalty isn’t a one-way street. You don’t get protection, money, and support while sitting on the sidelines when it matters. Maybe it’s time to rethink the deal: Don’t stand with us? Don’t call us. Simple.

SB25-276 is in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution - specifically the Supremacy Clause and the Oath Clause in Article VI, as well as long-standing principles governing attorney licensing and professional conduct. Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2): This makes the Constitution, Federal Laws, and Treaties "the supreme Law of the Land." State laws, regulations, or oaths that conflict with or obstruct federal law are invalid. An oath directing attorneys to ignore or defy federal law enforcement (e.g., FBI investigations, federal subpoenas, or enforcement of valid federal statutes) would actively interfere with federal authority and be preempted. Oath Requirement (Article VI, Clause 3): All state officers (and attorneys, as officers of the court) "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution." Federal and state officers must uphold federal law where it applies. Courts mandating an oath telling attorneys not to comply with federal enforcement would directly contradict this constitutional duty. constitution.congress.gov Attorney Oaths in Practice States regulate the practice of law and set bar admission requirements, but every state’s attorney oath (with only a handful of narrow exceptions) already requires support for the U.S. Constitution. The vast majority of States explicitly require attorneys to “support,” “uphold,” “defend,” “obey,” or “bear true allegiance to” the U.S. Constitution (often alongside the state constitution). @FBIDirectorKash @POTUS Colorado needs to be seriously investigated with arrests post haste!

Colorado now requires lawyers to certify they won’t use court e-filing data to assist federal immigration enforcement (unless ordered by law). ⚖️ Condition to access the system 💬 Data protection… or federal conflict? Source: X / Colorado Courts #colorado

Dr. Brian Hooker just declared that the studies PROVE vaccines can cause neurological damage. “It's the aluminum.” “Aluminum is directly neurotoxic.” “You get it in the majority of 6 vaccines that are given from 2 months [through] 18 months of life.” “Children are exposed to it if they get the Hep B shot on the first day of life.” “We read through [studies] regarding vaccines, the vaccine schedule, and autism.” “[One] paper makes the linkages from an epidemiological perspective.” “From a biochemical… cell biology, and molecular genetics perspective.” “We actually… worked our way backward from the damage that we know occurs in the brains of children and adults with autism.” “What came out very, very conclusively was that there isn’t just one problem with vaccines, but if you were to pick one, it is so ubiquitous.” “Aluminum salt adjuvants, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, aluminum hydroxy phosphate sulfate.” @BrianHookerPhD @askrsb #ProfoundAutism

Dutch MP Thierry Baudet drops the BOMBSHELL: 2010 Rockefeller Foundation documents PROVE the ‘Covid Lockdown Nightmare’ was PLANNED a DECADE early. Their own ‘Lock Step Scenario’ scripted the pandemic, mass control, fear, and ‘new normal’ tyranny. The Elites WROTE the SCRIPT

🚨ANOTHER DAMNING Swalwell DROP! The women are TALKING! 🔥Eric Swalwell, you pathetic predator! More brave women are dropping the hammer on your ABUSE OF POWER! Cheyenne L. Hunt came forward with the full timeline, and it’s damning (video below) While this creep hides behind a defamation lawsuit threat and cries “election interference” over Fang Fang, real victims are exposing exactly who he is. National security risk. Serial abuser. It’s only a matter of time before MSM drops the hammer on YOU, Eric Swalwell🫵🏻 EVERYONE, please LISTEN AND SHARE!👇🏻

🚨 LMAO! Trump to kids at the Easter Egg Roll: “I could sign autographs for you guys, and then tonight, you could sell them for $25,000 on eBay!” 🤣 “Biden would use the AUTOPEN... he was incapable of signing his name, so they'd follow him around with this big machine. You know what it was called? AN AUTOPEN!” 😂🔥

Democrats are in such panic mode right now!!

Make this make sense: rumble.com/v5wo1mq-the-se… Never forget that these Healthcare Workers murdered people for pay.

“There is no such thing as a free lunch. Every time you grant a right to someone, there is always someone else who has to pay for it. So the question here is very simple. Do you believe you have a right over the rest of the citizens? Then we'll actually see who is truly totalitarian, who is the one who truly thinks they are superior. If they believe they have rights over the rest of the citizens, it means they believe they are more important than the rest. [People simply want what was granted to them.] No, well, nothing is free. Someone pays the bill. What we have to ask ourselves is, are we facing a society of looters? Because John Stuart Mill already explained this quite clearly. When people care so much about equality over liberty, they ultimately become a society of looters. Suppose the following. You have an apartment. You go and mortgage it. And you take the money. And with that money, you do pay the mortgage payment. But you go party in Europe. You blow it all. Of course, you're doing great. Now, when you come back, you don't have a dime because you're out of a job. They ask you to pay. What are you going to say? “No, I have a right.” What right? You spent it all. I mean, you consumed the capital. So now you know what you're going to be? You're going to be poorer because you consumed the capital. This country under that logic is unviable. I propose we go to an equilibrium, separate the country between the lazy parasites who live off of those of us who work our asses off and those of us who work. Let's see how far the parasites who do nothing get without us paying that bill.”

Absolutely. This is called the "But-For Clause/But-for-Causation/But-for-in-fact." Burrage v. United States (21 U.S.C. § 841) is the definitive Supreme Court citation cited across federal criminal cases whenever the government must prove that a defendant’s conduct was the but-for cause of a prohibited result. The prohibited result would be the laws and judges prohibiting incarceration for crimes committed by the perpetrator. They, along with the judges/DAs/ADAs that agree to and implement the release of criminals, should be arrested.

This is called the "But-For Clause/But-for-Causation/But-for-in-fact." Burrage v. United States (21 U.S.C. § 841) is the definitive Supreme Court citation cited across federal criminal cases whenever the government must prove that a defendant’s conduct was the but-for cause of a prohibited result. The prohibited result would be the laws and judges prohibiting incarceration for crimes committed by the perpetrator. They should be arrested.

Florida’s CFO “The easiest way to end sanctuary policies is to start charging the politicians” as accomplices to the crimes” Is this the segue? YES LET’S DO !

Here, listen up about Lyme's disease

We all will, if we put in the work, as he cannot do it alone - as the UNITED States of America. 🇺🇸 💜 This means contacting and following up with our Reps, voting bad ones out, cleaning up our judicial & election systems, etc., etc... Its going to take us all to pitch-in in many different roles. 💜

This is what our children's children will learn about in history class...

@TheGrayRider That's truly creative. 👍

At Easter dinner today, I noticed that we had a bunch of these for dessert.