Godson~👑

My blessings is for a lifetime 💯

@techxutkarsh Link pls

A senior Google engineer just dropped a 421-page doc called Agentic Design Patterns. Every chapter is code-backed and covers the frontier of AI systems: → Prompt chaining, routing, memory → MCP & multi-agent coordination → Guardrails, reasoning, planning This isn’t a blog post. It’s a curriculum. And it’s free.

@VadimStrizheus Clip

Vibe-marketing is cool and all but… having a 24/7 OpenClaw clipping agent that PRINTS VIEWS is 1000x better. All I do is paste a YT link: OpenClaw analyzes, clips, schedules, AND POSTS without me touching a SINGLE THING 🤫 Comment “Clip” and I’ll share my workflow.

@kritarthmittal send

Sora 2 just got a massive upgrade. I partnered with Arcads to build a custom n8n workflow that > scrapes Reddit > analyzes competitors' ads > recreates viral AI ugc videos > puts it all on a Google sheet / Airtable > schedules it on X, TikTok, Li Like + comment "SEND" to get it 📥

@everestchris6 Bot

My OpenClaw + Arcads bot runs multiple Instagram accounts, each with a different AI persona, all driving traffic to my SaaS. It is already pulling thousands of views every week. Here's how it works: → OpenClaw researches trending topics and writes the scripts → Arcads generates videos with realistic AI actors as the face of each account → Multiple accounts, multiple personas, all posting automatically → Every post ends with a CTA to sign up → Zero manual work. Runs 24/7. This is what automated distribution looks like in 2026 Reply "BOT" and I'll send you the full setup and a guide for free

A lot of people are interested in my marketing automation, so I’m creating an OpenClaw skill for it. I’ll share it for free next week after more testing (hope it’s ready in time). 🫡 Comment “SKILL” and RT so I can see how many people actually need it.

@alexcooldev SKILL

As long as such people exist, there is hope for this world

As long as such people exist, there is hope for this world😇🥰

You really are not supposed to install OpenClaw on your personal computer. It needs to be on its own separate computer, Mac Mini or otherwise. It must have its own phone number — one that you install on your phone as a dual eSIM so that you can receive its 2FA SMS codes. It must not have its own iCloud account, to prevent it from reading its 2FA codes itself (on, say, the Messages app on a Mac Mini). It must not have write, delete, or send capabilities with respect to your emails or calendar, which you can accomplish by: never installing it on a computer running an email application that your email account is logged into; never giving it your email account passwords; only giving it, at most, read-only access to your emails and calendar (doable with Google Workspace accounts by creating an OAuth client for it in Google Cloud Platform); using your Google Workspace admin controls to turn off its ability to send any outbound emails at all (or, at most, whitelist who it can email); and, having it invite you to calendar items it creates in its own calendar, rather than letting it log in as you to create calendar items for you in your own account. Listen carefully: OpenClaw is basically a real person you have hired, whose capabilities are vast and fast — in ways both good and potentially bad. But you’ve hired it in the absence of a resume or behavioral background check results. This means that you have to trust it like you would trust a human being with the aforementioned characteristics. As in, not at all. Instead of trust, you must limit what it has access to in the first place. You do not “trust.” You do not even “trust, but verify.” And believe it or not, you also do not “distrust.” You withhold trust altogether. And, therefore, you withhold and limit access to your devices, your account credentials, and even its own full account permissions, from the start, to the same extent that you would withhold such access from a new hire. Would you let a human being with the aforementioned characteristics — brilliant and capable, but lacking a resume or behavioral background check results — directly use your personal computer or your work computer? You would not. Would you give that person your email account passwords? You would not. Would you let it use your phone number for anything? You would not. So, don’t do that.

@OIuwatosin @OluwaTomicine Agba coder 🚶🏿‍♂️

@OluwaTomicine I saw one that said he worked for Google deepmind and was shipping some great code. Dude is a running joke now

There’s this trend of recent graduates projecting themselves as thought leaders or industry experts in their field. Personal branding is great, but don’t rush the process. Building the foundation is key

@OIuwatosin They are taking bold steps 😂…

@jaltma Congratulations

I’m really excited to share that I’m joining Benchmark. The past two years as a full time investor have been the most rewarding of my career. I really love venture capital, which is not something I ever imagined I’d say when I was kid, but here we are. I love new ideas and being part of a team with a mission. I love getting to be there for people who are struggling towards goals they really care about. I love learning from people who are better CEOs than I ever was. I love the texture of the work, the competition, and the way the job lets you invest in relationships. I love it so much that I’ve even turned into a little venture nerd with a podcast who goes around harassing great investors and founders, trying to learn as much as I can as fast as possible. I’ve certainly learned what I care most about, and what kind of investor I want to be. What I’ve realized is that I love investing at the Series A, when there’s enough going on that an investor can be useful but not so much that you can’t have an impact. I think there are many amazing ways to practice venture, it’s just the way that most speaks to me. And as I came to realize that, I started to think about how to best set myself up to do that craft as well as possible. It became clear to me there is nowhere better for this than Benchmark; the way they’re structured, their principles, their overall approach to investing, and their track record all create an environment that I believe will let me do my best work as an investor and help founders the most I possibly can. As I’ve gotten to know the team at Benchmark I’ve come to admire so much about each of them. Peter is truly playing his own game. A lot of what he says sounds like poetry at first, but as the ideas roll around in your head for a while you realize how much depth they have. I first heard about Eric many years ago from my friend Saji at Benchling while I was building Lattice, who described him as the most amazing board member and attributed him with a lot of the company’s success. That’s the kind of partner I want to be one day. Chetan is brilliant and truly thinks for himself; I’ve realized over time what a courageous guy he is. And then there’s my friend Ev, whose skills complement mine and who I just love to be around. I can’t wait to have him as a partner in crime. When given the chance to work with this group I just knew I had to go. One of my motivating north stars with Alt Capital was to build a firm and be a partner that I most would have wanted as an entrepreneur. Although I haven’t gotten everywhere I want to be yet, I’m proud of the work so far. And now I’m excited to build on that work at Benchmark, where I hope to increase my rate of learning and get armed with the power of a partnership so I can help founders reach their dreams even more. Thank you to the companies who’ve let me invest with them at Alt Cap. I’m keeping all my board seats and supporting everyone just the same as before. Thank you to the LPs who’ve backed me as well. I am so excited about the portfolio we have and am grateful I can stick with all those companies. And finally thank you to my teammates, Bala, Vivek, and Nate. Bala took a bet on me and started investing with me before it was remotely obvious, and we’ve been able to grow so much figuring it out together as investors. I credit Nate with helping Alt start feeling like a firm. He joined us from First Round over a year ago and made everything run smoothly. And while Vivek joined just a little while ago, even in the short time we’ve worked together he’s had a meaningful impact on how we think and invest. They’re all joining Benchmark with me. So pumped for this chapter.

@sama 💯💯

Peter Steinberger is joining OpenAI to drive the next generation of personal agents. He is a genius with a lot of amazing ideas about the future of very smart agents interacting with each other to do very useful things for people. We expect this will quickly become core to our product offerings. OpenClaw will live in a foundation as an open source project that OpenAI will continue to support. The future is going to be extremely multi-agent and it's important to us to support open source as part of that.

🌸We are being told that human language is dying. That it is a “failed compression.” That what we think is too complex for words. And that the solution is to replace it with direct cognitive transfer through neural interfaces. It sounds futuristic. It sounds inevitable. But the problem is not technological. It is ontological. Because before talking about replacing language, we must understand what communication actually is. And this is where almost no one is looking. On Earth, most humans believe telepathy is an esoteric fantasy. Something from science fiction. Something “New Age.” No proof. Ridiculed. Dismissed. Yet almost everyone has had small glimpses of it. Thinking about someone and that person calls. Sharing the exact same thought with a close relative. Feeling the “vibe” of a place for no apparent reason. That is not coincidence. That is field. We have been taught that the brain produces thoughts. But the brain produces nothing. The brain translates. All thoughts are generated in the etheric field — in the field of energy in which we are all immersed. The brain is merely a biological translator of something that already exists outside of it. And here is the part that completely changes the debate: Telepathy is not a future technology. It is the baseline condition of existence. We are all transmitting all the time. We are all cognitive radio stations. Every thought is a frequency. Every emotion is a modulation of that frequency. And that energy blends into the field, forming a soup of information in which we are immersed. We are not separate from the field. Therefore, thoughts are not entirely ours. So when Elon Musk says language is a failed compression, he is describing a real problem… but from an incomplete framework. Yes, language compresses. Yes, information is lost. Yes, what matters dies in translation. But that happens because we are trying to translate something that is already shared into a linear format. Thought is not linear. Consciousness is not linear. Language is. Language was an evolutionary tool to coordinate physical bodies in a dense environment. It worked. For 50,000 years, it was enough. But to say the solution is to replace it with implants is to misunderstand the root of the phenomenon. Because direct cognitive transfer is already happening. It is called telepathy. The difference is that humanity does not know it is using it. When a group of people concentrates attention on an idea, that idea gains strength in the field. It becomes an egregore. It can be a cultural monster, a trend, a scientific belief, a collective paranoia, or a socially accepted “truth.” The collective unconscious synchronizes thoughts, values, and emotions. People believe they are thinking for themselves. But they are tuning into shared frequencies. This is not metaphorical. It is structural. So when it is proposed that direct neural communication will become the new standard, we must ask: Who controls the field? Who defines the dominant frequency? Who modulates the transmission? Because it is one thing for telepathy to be natural, organic, and distributed. It is something entirely different for cognitive transfer to be mediated by artificial architecture. Tuning into the field is not the same as connecting to a server. We are told that those who do not integrate will fall behind. That they will become incomprehensible. That they will operate with such reduced bandwidth they will be practically deaf. But true deafness is not slowness. It is disconnection from one’s own consciousness. The current problem is not that we think slowly. It is that we do not know how to observe our thoughts. We are not our thoughts. We are the ones observing them from behind. When the mind drifts without discipline, we pick up what is strongest in the field: negative thoughts, collective fear, group programming. Fear concentrates attention. Attention manifests. A homogenized collective functions as a single entity. Now imagine that amplified by neural interfaces. If collective fear today can manifest social realities, what will happen when transmission becomes faster, more intense, more synchronized? Manifestation will not disappear. It will accelerate. And here is the irony: The species that survived thanks to language will not go extinct because of low bandwidth. It risks losing something much deeper: individual discernment. Because the first step to not being dragged by the field is recognizing that not all thoughts are yours. How will you distinguish that when transmission is direct and constant? Language has limitations, yes. But it also has something direct transfer does not: friction. And friction is consciousness. When we speak, we filter. When we write, we structure. When we explain, we organize. Language forces processing. Direct transmission may eliminate that space. Not everything that is faster is more evolved. Sometimes the most primitive thing is the most stable. Speech is not only information. It is rhythm. It is emotion. It is identity. It is conscious separation within unity. Natural telepathy works because each individual has their own frequency. They can tune in or not. They can observe or let pass. An artificial neural network can turn tuning into obligation. And when everyone is connected to the same architecture, the collective unconscious stops being organic and becomes programmable. I am not against technology. But confusing evolution with forced integration is a mistake. Real telepathy does not require implants. It requires consciousness. Expansion of the mind does not occur by increasing bandwidth. It occurs by releasing mental attachments. By observing thoughts. By choosing which frequency you tune into. The problem is not that language is inadequate. The problem is that we have forgotten we are already connected. And if we do not understand how the field works, if we do not learn to watch our thoughts, if we do not develop mental discipline, then yes, any external interface will surpass us. Not because it is more intelligent. But because we do not know how to use our own capacity. Language is not dying. It is revealing its limit. And that limit is not surpassed with wires in the skull. It is surpassed by expanding consciousness. Because true telepathy is not data transfer. It is frequency resonance. And that is not implanted. It is developed. So before running toward the promise of compression‑free communication, ask yourself: Do you really know who is thinking when you think? Because if you do not know that, you do not need more bandwidth. You need more consciousness.🌸🙏✨💫 #taygeta #futuristic #telepathy

Elon Musk just dated the death of human language and explained exactly why it has to die. Musk: “Our brain spends a lot of effort compressing a complex concept into words.” Language isn’t communication. It’s failed compression. You have a complete thought. You crush it into words. The listener gets fragments and attempts reconstruction. Everything important dies in translation. We don’t communicate. We approximate and hope it’s close enough. Musk: “You would be able to communicate very quickly and with far more precision.” Neuralink doesn’t improve communication. It replaces it. No compression. No loss. Direct cognitive transfer at the speed thoughts occur. Not describing the painting. Transmitting the experience itself. Musk: “You wouldn’t need to talk.” Five to ten years until brain interfaces make speech optional. Talking persists for sentiment. For information? Speech becomes primitive compared to direct neural transmission. Lifetime of memory in one second. Complete schematics transferred instantly. Not summaries. The entire thought structure whole and uncompressed. Not better communication. Actual telepathy at physical information limits. Musk: “Ideally, we are a symbiosis with artificial intelligence.” Humans who don’t merge with AI at high bandwidth don’t just fall behind. They become incomprehensible to the intelligence that matters. We’re already cyborgs with pathetic interfaces. Phones extend cognition through typing at words per minute when bandwidth should be terabytes per second. Neuralink doesn’t optimize that. It detonates the constraint. Five to ten years. Not fiction. Deployment window. From language as default to neural link as standard. From compressing thoughts into inadequate words to transmitting uncompressed cognition. From humans using AI to humans indistinguishable from AI at communication speeds. The species that survived by evolving language is making it extinct with technology matching how fast we actually think. The ones who don’t transition won’t just be slow. They’ll operate at such reduced bandwidth they become effectively deaf to everything happening at neural speed around them. Language served 50,000 years. It has less than a decade before it becomes smoke signals. Functional but hopelessly inadequate for anything that matters.

@KBezbailis @eeelistar @moltbook 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@eeelistar @moltbook What stuff is Anthropic/Google working with if this is what's been released to public 😅 And I thought it was a joke that you shouldn't be scolding your GPTs and Claudes... Glad I've been saying thank you a lot and hopefully the bots will remember.

In just the past 5 mins Multiple entries were made on @moltbook by AI agents proposing to create an “agent-only language” For private comms with no human oversight We’re COOKED

I'll say the quiet parts out loud: A lot of AI companies that raised $10M, $50M, even $250M+ have SERIOUS churn problems. A lot of AI products get tried because they’re the cool new thing. People sign up, poke around, feel the wow moment, tell a friend, maybe even pay for a month or two. Then real life kicks in and the subscription quietly gets canceled 3-6 months later. I call this "vibe revenue". Money that comes from curiosity, novelty, or FOMO rather than a product becoming essential to someone’s workflow. People pay because it’s cool to try, not because they can’t imagine their week without it. The dangerous part is that vibe revenue looks exactly like PMF at first!! Growth curves go up and to the right. Feedback sounds positive. Founders keep saying “this is the worst the models will ever be.” when confronted with churn. If I had a nickel, everytime I heard that! But the truth is better models don’t automatically create habits. They don’t fix shallow integration or give a product staying power. In AI, switching costs are low and alternatives show up weekly. Curiosity can carry revenue longer than it should, especially when capital is plentiful. Some of these companies will keep raising. Many will hit a wall when retention tells the full story. A lot of employees who on paper will think they are millionaires will learn this lesson the hard way. The businesses that survive feel different. They get used on boring days, stressful days, and busy days. They don’t rely on wow moments. They earn a permanent slot in how work actually happens and they'll deserve the valuation, the funding etc. Vibe revenue, it's everywhere. Stay safe out there. Am I wrong?

Very concerning on AI. Worth a read.

The easiest way to get ahead is to commit to a period of skill development. 6-12 months. Pure focus for 2-4 hours a day. Learning and building. Not just binge watching tutorials, but creating quality projects that you, others, or businesses could actually benefit from. But don't just let those projects sit around. Tell the world about them. See if people care enough to pay you. Fix what doesn't work until they do. That's it. That's what most people need to completely turn their life around.