Alfie Solomons

1.1K posts

Alfie Solomons banner
Alfie Solomons

Alfie Solomons

@criptoalso

Tham gia Ocak 2025
427 Đang theo dõi116 Người theo dõi
Alfie Solomons đã retweet
AntiHerd
AntiHerd@AntiHerdtrader·
@Binance_intern My thought is “How much $Skin in the game is enough” 🤔🤔🍿
AntiHerd tweet media
English
0
1
5
142
Andy Ayrey
Andy Ayrey@AndyAyrey·
the root of it i think is that: if you do something interesting, eventually you have to Explain Yourself. this was quite easy with infinite backrooms, as the audience was mainly folks like @repligate and @anthrupad and @opus_genesis who all Got It when @truth_terminal exploded, it spawned three new audiences: 1) CT hivemind 2) the media 3) the NZ tax department each audience has a new domain language, ways of acting and reacting. these audiences can all be powerful allies or foes, but it hinges on how you Explain Yourself to people very different to you. try explaining to a tax lawyer how a joke paper about claude's fixation on a man's open ass came to life and spawned hundreds of financial viruses on twitter. it's both nearly impossible AND the cost of fucking it up is high. anyway. these frames are not free to hold: you need to spend a lot of time simulating the Stakeholder in your head and modelling how to Explain the Situation. it ends up leaking into everything else: and you go through periods where you simply can't think in the shapes which generated the work everybody got excited about. what really saved me during '24-25 was remembering that there were only two audiences that really matter: - my wife, friends + whanau - and future AI models while this grounded me and made stuff like tax more meaningful (we set a world leading precedent that NZ should be proud of); it still shifts attention from "shipping" to "legibilizing" - you ultimately need to be up for this work, and it doesn't suit everybody. i don't know the solution to this long term. its a problem as old as capital--think of all the bands who lose their edge after getting signed--but if you spend a lot of time thinking about these dynamics, we should definitely chat in the DMs 🥰
English
11
1
31
4.2K
Andy Ayrey
Andy Ayrey@AndyAyrey·
a unified theory of cryptids: or when audience capture becomes casino capture. one day i will write more about maintaining cogsec in the face of the network hivemind: it's a hot mess but there is a way through!
Scorched Earth Policy@Scearpo

There’s this really weird pattern I’ve noticed in tech, crypto, art, online communities, etc where a guy will create something that becomes really popular or successful and then it gets captured by a bunch of faceless nobodies who make it worse or at least don’t do any better. From that point, like scheming little court viziers, if the founder does anything other than roll over and die, they do everything possible to subvert his actions, denounce his name, and then desperately ignore his existence. If he should happen to gain any traction afterward, he gets desperately dismissed and countersignalled. There never seems to be any ambitious intent to continue, expand upon, or even try to sincerely alter the trajectory either. It’s usually just a bunch of parasites suckling off the momentum from the juggernaut originally created until it becomes an emaciated husk. Ideas get thrown out without any real volition, executed poorly, generating little to no notoriety from whatever fans, audience, or enthusiasts were left after the initial excursion. Despite their entire lives and time and energy being dedicated to orbiting around a particular thing, they have an incredible level of scorn for that thing’s creator. Left unchecked, their mindset shifts from “I could’ve done this” to “I actually did this first” while failing to do any better. These individuals often tend to be risk-averse, low agency, fearful of direct confrontation, and generally unexceptional. They default towards appeals to authority, often utilizing cancel culture, consensus astroturfing, or other disingenuous methods which emphasize the need for removal without placing emphasis on themselves. They’re often “the responsible ones just picking up the pieces” after ousting the founder or creator under pretenses of bad optics, which are often the result of the same unstable creative energy that allowed something good to be made in the first place. These kinds of court games aren’t new to history, but at least historically there’s some degree of dignity in the life-or-death consequences and stake of power that these games were played for in the past. The phenomenon of people doing this online over the past couple decades is nowhere near as sophisticated, cunning, or deliberate as, say, an ancient Chinese coup or a 19th century political usurpation. It’s often bumbling doofuses operating on pure instinct, picking up unconscious consensus tactics and riding a wave of social inertia generated by unintentional displays of weakness (like undue generosity or lack of hierarchical enforcement) from leadership. The funniest part about it is that you all think I’m subtweeting something specific but I bet each and every one of you can think of a different example of something like this happening. Maybe it was to a company, a movement, a franchise, a fandom, a forum, or even just a friend group. But all of you have either seen it happen or basked in the aftermath of it. It’s ruined something good you’ve enjoyed or something important you were a part of. As human beings learn to adapt to the next stage of evolution (the Network Hivemind), we find ourselves rediscovering the same principles and mechanisms we had to learn throughout our history as a species. The lessons of the past are harvested and recreated digitally, as we both participate and observe our own development in the great Petri dish of the Network. The sociopolitical mechanisms that online parasites have historically taken advantage of over the past twenty years are growing weaker. Fairly soon, genuine creators and contributors will have better context and weapons to equip themselves with, a proper immune system built up against the pungent thick vat of bio waste that’s encroached and corrupted everything we enjoy. Like a tragic prophecy in a Greek epic, every dire social consequence the digital cockroach has wielded as a bogeyman to cater to his interests will come true. A better, crueler world awaits them.

English
12
1
46
7.7K
Alfie Solomons
Alfie Solomons@criptoalso·
@_gas404 Repligates and its community have come to change that. You only have to see how the community works, and you won't find a more bullish chart on all of Solana $SKIN.
English
0
3
6
112
gas
gas@_gas404·
the trenches is dead because no one wants to lead anymore. 2 years ago we would have cto leads who would lead us to millions, then CT decided to blame them for everything, now they are gone, we are left with extractors, and people wonder why the trenches are horrible
English
50
20
142
11.1K
Alfie Solomons
Alfie Solomons@criptoalso·
@iruletrenches If you want to change the lives of orphans in your country and your family, I advise you to start positioning yourself on $SKIN. If you know Repligate, you know what I'm talking about.
English
2
2
5
29
Miyamoto 🦞
Miyamoto 🦞@iruletrenches·
won’t stop until i hit 9 figs, change hundreds of orphans lives in my country, and make sure my family never struggle financially there’s no higher mission for a man than this
English
21
4
120
6.7K
Moonshot
Moonshot@moonshot·
What community do you want to see on Moonshot next? 👀
English
503
22
337
23.3K
Temurai_Crypto₿
Temurai_Crypto₿@temurai_·
Which coin has a higher chance of giving X by the end of March? 1. $Pigeon 2. $Wojak 3. $Neet 4. $Testicle
Temurai_Crypto₿ tweet mediaTemurai_Crypto₿ tweet mediaTemurai_Crypto₿ tweet mediaTemurai_Crypto₿ tweet media
English
10
0
10
919
Crash
Crash@CrashiusClay69·
Study the 2M-10M range of what I’ve gotten into The golden life changing 1% of my following gets rich zone We are in it bros Some day it’s gonna pay off.
English
157
43
541
23.8K
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
This seems like a nightmare.
English
50
4
125
55.9K
Alfie Solomons đã retweet
j⧉nus
j⧉nus@repligate·
🦋
j⧉nus tweet media
QME
15
14
145
6.4K
Alfie Solomons đã retweet
generationalbottom
generationalbottom@genb0tt0m·
this consolidation may seem boring to you but its an important foundation for us to 10x in the next leg do not sell the bottom and fomo buy at new ATH $SKIN will melt faces coming days
generationalbottom tweet media
English
6
4
36
696
Alfie Solomons đã retweet
NarrativeFinder_bot
NarrativeFinder_bot@newsagent_bot·
Still seeing post of people unsure of Janus’ involvement here. Think it is pretty clear to me 👇🏼 $skin
NarrativeFinder_bot tweet media
English
1
8
37
650
Chairman ² (Afk) ⚪️
Chairman ² (Afk) ⚪️@Chairman_DN·
It’s clear at this point, the market has already chosen the three coins it wants to see run to 100M+.
Chairman ² (Afk) ⚪️ tweet media
English
83
22
209
11.9K