Dee 𖤍

I am going to be one of the best Product Designers, I have ever seen...

@leyeConnect Color Inspo just in case

Successfully reconstructed the NDC logo, maintained the integrity of the logo and colour, but that initial colour combination is diabolical. That said, once he is announced as the presidential candidate, design assets will be made public. We are on stand by.

@HeyTesian @dean_maj

I like The Newyorker’s take on taste or as they put it “Tastewashing” And it brings me to one of the issues I have with AI companies and their recent obsession with TASTE. Is that many of these companies know their products, aren’t cool and they lack identity.

@mobbin you know what to do…

Nah....I'm definitely homeschooling my kids...

@theajdesign @dean_maj

We are looking to expand our team of Motion Designers at ManMadeDesigns.in If you have experience in Product UI animations, that’s great. Having 3D experience is a bonus. Role - Full Time

@ayushsoni_io @dean_maj @Design_weirdo

we're hiring across web, brand, motion and product hex.inc/join

I understand, Omo

@jon_chuka @claudeai @dean_maj dem wan comot food from bros hand

@iamDeeSigner_ @claudeai @dean_maj 😂 make he come really see

Claude now connects to the tools creative professionals already use. With the new Blender connector, you can debug a scene, build new tools, or batch-apply changes across every object, directly from Claude.

@OdunEweniyi You broke abi you no broke? I mean, you guys almost fired But still LinkedIn people nah, e jor

lmaooo i hate linkedin so much 😭

THE POLITICS OF NIGERIA CANNOT PRODUCE THE NIGERIA YOU GUYS DREAM OF. I need you all to remember this.

@GoogleAI @dean_maj come and see o

Beyond generating high-fidelity visuals, we wanted to test the limits of what Nano Banana Pro can do. We worked with design partners Porto Rocha to build out a hypothetical brand called YOYOYO to see how the model would handle the task. Here’s what we found: 🎨Brand consistency: Across logos, colors, and typography, the model maintained a strict, cohesive brand identity (even for wildly diverse concepts) 🛍️Environmental realism: We asked to see the products in storefront and studio mockups. It nailed accurate lighting, shadows, and physical proportions - even when upscaled for massive retail displays 🪀Spatial accuracy: We tested spatial volumes for physical packaging. The generated proportions were so precise that we were able to 3D-print the functional yo-yo How have you been pushing the limits of Nano Banana Pro? Let us know in the replies below!

Designers who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.

@codemathics oh damn. I'm wiping my PC 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@iamDeeSigner_ such bold move! 😂

i couldn't even click on the context [dot] ai link. paranoia so strong! 😂

The most anticipated keynote of all year…definitely one for the books

Most confusion about the future of software design stems from a confusion in terminology. My view: production design will increasingly be automated. The economic logic is self-evident — training machines to mimic and refine existing production practices is cheaper, faster, and more reliable than training humans to do the same. Strategic design, or “what at are we doing and why,” will look very different. The mediums will broaden: from pencil and paper all the way to automated experiments running in production, iterated on by agents while we sleep. The inputs and systems we create to find opportunities will reward the most intrepid problem-finders. Design stops being a method of sitting and ruminating on possible forms or solution spaces. Design becomes active, research-based, and built around speed of discovery and expression. Exploratory design will undergo the greatest shifts. Historically this has been the domain of the artist and the inventor. What existed in the world sprung from the imaginations of people with waking hours to spare and the technical chops to give form to their ideas. But soon agents will join the mix. Humans and machines alike will generate novel ideas and expressions, building on a vast combinatorial space of possibility. Humans and machines alike will be capable of bringing these forms to market. The key difference? Humans sleep and have finite, socially agreed upon vocabulary. We may be intuitively suited to know the desires of our fellow man. But machines will have a vaster set of references to draw from, and methods to choose what's most effective in the wild — using taste/selection criteria no human operator alone can summon. These forces are not mutually exclusive. But they DO operate on a common landscape of global demand—of Desire in the grandest sense. No matter how much we might wish otherwise, human designers and creatives are not divorced from the logic of desire — nor from unit economics, opportunity costs, or the ever-evolving ways we probe and understand an open-ended set of markets made up of humans and agents alike. Creativity has no bounds. But desire underpins it all. Design itself will not be recognizable from what exists today. Imagine describing NYC to an ancient cave dweller. Agents today are like the most primitive forms of seafaring trade. Instead it will be defined by the designers who build new systems and methods for understanding, channeling, and feeding desire in all its forms.

So, designers?.