Patrick

69.1K posts

Patrick banner
Patrick

Patrick

@patrick_VOR

Husband to 1. Old man to 2. We are still Premier League #NFFC

United Kingdom Tham gia Ocak 2021
1.4K Đang theo dõi805 Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
What an absolutely pathetic man baby Trumplethinskin is. He can’t take any criticism and tries to shut down anyone who dares to challenge him. He really is the worst America has to offer. #NBC #SethMyers
Patrick tweet media
English
2
0
6
1.9K
Young Bob
Young Bob@YoungBobRB·
I completely forgot to mention this. But @Fred_cpo does this out of the goodness of his heart. He’s not my security, he just volunteers to be there with me. Members of Antifa are trying to mass report him and are spreading some nasty rumours on the internet, so if you haven't done so already, give them a follow. Fred is definitely someone of high moral standing. God Bless
Young Bob@YoungBobRB

We’ve just landed in Liverpool to cover the UKIP 'March for Jesus' protest, with Antifa counter-protesting and several MPs in the surrounding area in support. Of course, we have our security guard, @Fred_cpo, so we don’t repeat what happened in Bristol.

English
153
521
4.2K
96.6K
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@jessisajew She’s right though. Is that what hurts more?
English
0
0
0
59
Jewish Jess
Jewish Jess@jessisajew·
This is the personification of evil. Bushra; I pray to G-d that you nor a family member should ever require an ambulance, because heaven forbid the NHS are unable to respond, Hatzola would be called, and you're not worthy of their services. Evil woman.
Bushra Shaikh@Bushra1Shaikh

If the Muslim community had ambulances in London it would be framed by the media and some of the political class as "taking over" or "an act of dominance." But when it's the Jewish community, it's "charity".

English
186
94
822
35.7K
Nervana Mahmoud
Nervana Mahmoud@Nervana_1·
The most irritating guy on @GBNEWS Jonathan Lis claims “there is no evidence Iran is going to directly attack Britain”, as if he spent the night before chatting to IRGC 🤷🏻‍♀️
English
218
126
1.1K
31.9K
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
There is now a terror cell in north London. The fifth column is here.
English
2.2K
2.8K
13.9K
683.2K
Julia Hartley-Brewer
Fine words @SadiqKhan, but this is what happens when anti-Semitic chants are allowed on London's streets every week and when the Met Police don't even bother charging men filmed shouting about raping Jewish wives and daughters in broad daylight. What did you do about that? NOTHING.
Sadiq Khan@SadiqKhan

This is a cowardly attack on the Jewish community. I am in close contact with the police who are stepping up patrols in the area, and I urge anyone with information to come forward. Londoners will never be cowed by this kind of hatred and intimidation.

English
505
2.2K
11.7K
261.4K
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@witter_dad @SuellaBraverman I can see it now. More people furious that Muslims had their own ambulances than the fact they were attacked.
English
0
0
0
20
Suella Braverman
Suella Braverman@SuellaBraverman·
Let’s call this what it is: terrorism. Two tier policing, failure to ban the hate marches and a tolerance of antisemitism have led us to this. Spineless governments -Tory and Labour - have utterly failed to stop the poison of extremism from spreading on our streets. Sick of it.
The Telegraph@Telegraph

🚨Several ambulances reportedly belonging to a Jewish volunteer organisation have been set alight in Golders Green, northwest London Read this breaking and developing story here ⬇️ telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/2…

English
1.3K
2.6K
14.1K
315.5K
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
Neo-Nazis are so tetchy. 😂😂😂😂😂
Patrick tweet mediaPatrick tweet media
English
0
0
1
39
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
Nope. Just easy to spot liars.
English
0
0
0
6
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@PotnoodIefringe How do you see the screen? Don’t the teeth reflect too much?
English
0
0
1
98
PNF 🌚
PNF 🌚@PotnoodIefringe·
“New Peaky Blinders film on Netflix, that’s my night sorted with the Mrs”
PNF 🌚 tweet mediaPNF 🌚 tweet mediaPNF 🌚 tweet mediaPNF 🌚 tweet media
English
438
602
14.7K
3.8M
Sam Melia
Sam Melia@RealSamMelia·
First copy was given to… the delivery driver! He asked what all the boxes were, I explained the book and my case, he was shocked. Told me, unprompted, that @RupertLowe10 & @RestoreBritain_ were getting his vote as Reform clearly weren’t serious about getting the job done. Patriots are everywhere!
English
36
169
1.5K
12.5K
Jo Marney
Jo Marney@Jo_Marney·
Pupils who can’t speak English shouldn’t be in English schools. At all. Not only is it a burden on the schools and teachers but it is also detrimental to the foreign kids and their ability to learn. The fact that you say ‘well they can learn English’. That should be being addressed by their own parents who made the choice to come here and at their own expense. Not everyone else’s.
English
32
0
13
4.9K
andy twelves
andy twelves@andytwelves·
Hi @GoodwinMJ - I’ve read your response in full. You haven’t explained why you or MattGPT has made up multiple quotes attributed to figures like Cicero, Hayek, Burnham, Scruton, and Walker Connor, and why they cannot be verified in any primary texts or reliable secondary sources. You haven’t addressed the specific claims about schools, e.g. the Bradford classroom example, the supposed BBC West Midlands report, or the Ofsted quote, all of which appear to be either untraceable or misrepresented. Simply citing general EAL statistics doesn’t validate your specific anecdotal claims that don’t exist. You also haven’t engaged with the core issue around EAL itself. “English as an Additional Language” does not mean pupils cannot speak English or are unable to learn, and all the Ofsted reports of the schools you vaguely referenced consistently show strong progress by Year 6. Presenting this as evidence of systemic breakdown is objectively misleading and wrong. On migration figures, polling, and even basic political facts (e.g. Boris being in opposition in 2019), there are clear falsehoods that you haven’t corrected or clarified. I'd be really keen to have this discussion live with you, either on your show on @GBNEWS, the @PoliticsJOE_UK podcast, or a third broadcaster - or are you too afraid to have an open debate? Your response is embarrassing.
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ

A response to my critics. Suicide of a Nation is clearly becoming a major book & I'm DELIGHTED by the debate it's sparked. This is why I wrote it. People deserve to know the truth about what is happening in their own country. I also find myself in the curious position of watching Suicide of a Nation be criticised by people on both the Left, many of whom have clearly not read it, & people further to my Right, who oppose my support for Reform. I will deal with all this together. 1. Research, stats & evidence All the research, stats, data come from the official 2021 UK census data. The projections are calibrated to the 2022 Office for National Statistics national population projections, ensuring consistency with national trends. I believe this is the most systematic, sophisticated look at the demographic revolution unfolding in Britain that we have to date. To be clear, Suicide of a Nation is also a trade book, intended for a mass audience. It is not like books written by academics that are typically only read by a few dozen or a few hundred people. It is designed to reach tens of thousands, which it is now doing, to try and help shift the Overton Window. If you want all the detailed assumptions, analysis, & modelling behind the book you can read them here: shorturl.at/d3Hg8 Or if you want to look at the key trends in more detail you can see them in our Substack this morning: shorturl.at/LLBeS 2. Substack, links, and footnotes Trade books by their nature have minimal footnotes. The aim is to inspire a mass readership. Having spent 20 years in the universities, I wanted to write a trade book. Hence the lack of footnotes. If you want the data detail on the trends see the paper above. I do link to several of my Substack articles because, as it happens, with the exception of David Coleman, I am one of the only people who has run demographic projections at this level. You can read it here: shorturl.at/Gij6S. Ditto my discussion in the book of Muslim attitudes, Reform voters, and the economic costs of net migration. Nobody else is writing about these issues as we are at mattgoodwin.org hence me citing those pieces. I see no problem with this. I am proud of our work. Academics cite their own work all the time. It just so happens this time around they disagree with my work! 3. AI school census data Footnote 8 includes a reference to school and nursery data via AI which was then cross-checked with the real dataset (available here: shorturl.at/KlFVm. I see no issue obtaining datasets via AI so long as they are cross-checked with the original source (above). Hence why I include the reference. This school census data shows, clearly, nearly 1 in 4 primary pupils & nearly 1 in 3 nursery pupils no longer speak English as their main language. I attach the screenshot. In Bradford, the example, nearly 40% of state primary children do not speak English as their main language (see screenshot). In some primary schools in Bradford, 98% of pupils speak 'English as an additional language'. Nationally, as I talk about in the book, and as GB News revealed last year, there are now 2,000 schools where English is no longer the main language for most pupils In 2 primary schools, not a single child has English as their native tongue. In 107 schools, 9 in 10 pupils do not speak English at home. In 2,309 schools in England, English is no longer the first language. And across the country, 1.8 million children, 1 in 5, do not speak English as their main language (see here shorturl.at/KXROf) It is also now fact, as I say in the book, to have schools in the Midlands with more than 30 languages spoken: shorturl.at/OfyNj I notice my critics ignore all these statistics, as well as the obvious problems this creates in the classroom, for example -> shorturl.at/6TJYz The left-wing claim that this does not create problems is ludicrous. Research by scholars such as Strand and Hessel finds that pupils who speak English as an additional (not main) language explains 22% of the variation in their educational achievement, compared to 3-4% that is statistically explained by things like gender or free school meals (as a measure of poverty). So, unlike the Left, I think this is a major problem and I make no apology for saying so. We should have a shared language. Bilingualism undermines our shared culture & nation. Mass immigration is weakening our educational system. 4. Solutions and prognosis Some argue the book offers no solution. I disagree. I am clear throughout. End mass migration. Exit the ECHR. Repeal the HRA. End welfare & social housing subsidies for non-Brits. End two-tier multiculturalism. Crack down on Islamism. Invest in Pro-family policies. Deport illegal migrants, foreign criminals & those who do not make a net fiscal contribution to the UK economy. Reassert our free speech. Scrap definitions of 'Islamophobia'. Abolish non-crime hate incidents. Where I depart from critics further to my Right is in opposing vague and ill-defined talk about "mass deportations" or "remigration", which often appear to mean "deport anybody who isn't White", or "deport British nationals". I reject this - politically, morally, ethically. I simply do not think it is right, possible, politically appealing to an election-winning majority, or in tune with our political culture. I also do not think the Americans cheering on other parties understand the nuances in our political culture. 5. Intellectual lineage. The book implicitly nods, throughout, to the work of Roger Scruton, Eric Kaufmann, Anthony Smith, Walker Connor, Douglas Murray (subtitle), all of whom have warned through speeches, podcasts, e-mails, and articles about the loss of a historic majority group. This is deliberate. Left-wingers who argue, for example, that Smith or Connor did not warn about the loss of a historic core are simply not reading their work, or being disingenuous. The title of the book is a specific nod to Arthur Koestler's Suicide of a Nation, a left-wing account of Britain's decline in the postwar era. My book, in contrast, is obviously a national conservative/right-wing take on Britain's decline. Sometimes, you don't need to state your influences because they are so obvious - at least to people who read books. 6. Publishing in 2026 Some people have asked why I did not publish with a mainstream publisher given my past books were with Penguin, Oxford, Cambridge, Routledge, etc., and I wrote two Sunday Times bestsellers (now three?) The answer is because I believe the publishers have been ideologically captured and no longer allow genuine free speech and debate. Having gone through mainstream publishers, I know for a fact this book would never have been published or would have been edited and diluted to the point at which it says nothing interesting or truthful at all. Anybody who is a serious author, who has gone through the editorial process, knows this to be true. The reality, in 2026, is if you have a profile and a large Substack you no longer need mainstream publishers. You no longer need to be controlled by Gatekeepers. This is a positive development. And in many respects I hope that given it's obvious success (top 5 on Amazon) Suicide of a Nation will encourage others to break with establishment publishing. This is what we need to do if we are serious about taking on the institutions. Lastly, my thanks to the left-wing trolls and resentful, bitter, unsuccessful former academic colleagues who are coordinating an attack on the Amazon Reviews page. They are helping drive the algorithm, ensuring this book receives the attention it deserves and is read by many, many more people. I thank you for this. Best wishes, Matt p.s. buy the book below or via Waterstones, Blackwell's, Foyles, etc (Amazon is now regularly running out such is the demand) amazon.co.uk/Suicide-Nation…

English
58
405
1.9K
143.6K
Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺
Wow - that’s quite a fact check! 👏👏👏 Is anyone remotely surprised that @GoodwinMJ’s “research” appears to bear little resemblance to reality?
andy twelves@andytwelves

EXC: .@GoodwinMJ’s new book “Suicide of a Nation: Immigration, Islam, Identity” is out now, and I’m only 5 chapters in and have found a huge amount of what appears to be false quotes and basic misinterpretations of data, that appear to be AI hallucinations. Matthew, can you explain the claims you made in the book that I’ve outlined in the below thread?

English
2
28
124
3.2K
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@Tuesday58939298 @DreyfusJames @seen69 Their race is irrelevant. They are awful people because of their political views. In case you didn’t know, there were 3 characters in the Witches of Eastwick, hence the reference. Your attempt to play the race card has failed. Your whole reply was frankly laughable.
English
0
0
0
33
James Dreyfus
James Dreyfus@DreyfusJames·
Narinder… He left the comments on for 7 replies… all positive… before he switched them off, as per usual. As you can see below. Those who RT’d him are rightly frustrated, angry & fed up with him. NOT because he’s “having a coffee”, but for the plethora of examples of his rudeness, hypocrisy, double-standards, lies & malicious division. He’s an elected official who should be answerable to the public, yet consistently trolls us by arrogantly refusing to answer or be held accountable for anything. He’s been Mayor for nearly 10 years now. If you truly believe the only people who are sick to the back teeth with him are the “radicalised far-right”, then I have a live pterodactyl to sell you. But to suggest this is simply to do with him “having a coffee” is patently absurd.
James Dreyfus tweet media
Sadiq Khan@SadiqKhan

After a month of fasting dawn to dusk - never has a flat white tasted so good. Eid Mubarak! ☕️

English
115
230
2.4K
143.8K
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@Tuesday58939298 @DreyfusJames @seen69 So according to you, any man who calls a woman awful because of their political stance is misogynistic. Therefore according to you, they are beyond criticism. Using your logic, you criticising me is you being a misandrist.
English
0
0
0
35
Patrick
Patrick@patrick_VOR·
@dearaunty @thecarolemalone Wrong. Please try to understand the change before you embarrass yourself further. There is no right to fuller term abortion unless in exceptional circumstances. The limits have not changed.
English
0
0
0
13
.Dear Aunty
.Dear Aunty@dearaunty·
@patrick_VOR @thecarolemalone They're moving to de-criminalise abortion up to birth - full term . They would have the right to do without being prosecuted for it.
English
1
0
0
20