Wal đã retweet
Building a multi-agent system 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀
(This is why specialized agents beat generalists every time)
Instead of a single agent trying to handle everything, 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 employ teams of specialized agents, each with its own focused task.
So for example, you could have a team of:
A 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 that decides how to handle the users request.
A 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 that takes messy user queries and decomposes them into more manageable, clear subqueries.
A 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱/𝗼𝗿 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 that specializes in finding the right information from the right source.
A 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 that decides which tools to use and when.
A 𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 that decides how to best combine all the results to provide the more complete answer to the user.
𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 is what allows an agentic system like this to work. Short-term memory tracks the current conversation and recent actions. Long-term memory stores patterns, successful strategies, and domain knowledge. When agents share memory, they build on each other's work instead of starting from scratch every time.
Each agent has access to specific tools. The retrieval agents can call different search APIs. The validation agent might use a scoring model. The synthesis agent has access to the LLM for generation. They don't all need every tool - they just need the right ones for their specialized task.
IMHO, this is way more robust than a single agent trying to handle everything. When retrieval fails, the coordinator can try a different retrieval agent. When validation catches low-quality results, it can trigger a re-retrieval with different parameters. Specialization means better error handling and more reliable outcomes.
More agents means more complexity. But for complex tasks, multi-agent systems consistently outperform single agents trying to do it all.
English
