Bendix

@__nikskip__ @europa The Russians are still occupying Königsberg, but why would I be thankful or being defeated?

@Bendix53930 @europa That‘s why most germans are very thankful to the USA except for the russian simps in the former GDR

🇩🇪 German AfD leader Tino Chrupalla is calling for all US troops to be kicked out of Germany, pushing to end decades of American military presence and break from NATO-aligned policy. Around 40,000 US troops are still stationed in Germany. Chrupalla says Berlin must stop being dragged into foreign conflicts and pursue a fully independent path by 2029. Follow: @europa

@JOttoPohl1 But your target audience here speaks either German or Russian. The Volga Germans that would be interested in it don’t speak English. But tbh a lot of them probably don’t read to much.

@Bendix53930 No and going by the miniscule sales of the English language original, there never will be.

I just got my again disappointing royalty statement from Germany for The Years of Great Silence. It is not disappointing because of the small amount of money. Rather it is disappointing due to the very small number of sales. To sum for the year 2025 it sold a total of 134 copies for $137.75 in royalties. I could not even sell $150 worth of copies in a year.

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr Is this your own private struggle session? It was ex post facto, and many of the crimes discussed were also committed by the persecutors, sworn statements of Soviet witnesses about Katyn, German generals being convicted for things the Allie’s also did.

'Presented forged documents.' 👏👏😂 Name one, Dr Scheil. Specifically. With an archival reference. You've just made a public accusation of forgery against four Allied prosecutorial teams. That's a specific, falsifiable claim. So let's test it. Name the forged document. Identify the forgery. Cite the scholarship that demonstrates it. You're a published "historian", this should be straightforward. And while you're at it: 'They condemned crimes that their own states had committed.' You've just acknowledged that the crimes happened. You said 'crimes' not 'alleged crimes,' not 'so-called crimes.' Crimes. Your objection is that the Allies also committed crimes, not that Germany didn't. So we agree the crimes occurred. The Einsatzgruppen shootings occurred. The gas chambers occurred. The systematic extermination of European Jews occurred. Your argument is that the wrong court tried them. Fine. Which court should have tried them? A German court, in 1945, in a country whose entire judicial system had been an instrument of the regime that committed the crimes? An international court that didn't yet exist? Or no court at all, in which case your position is that industrialised genocide should go unpunished because the available judges were imperfect? You've spent this thread attacking the court. You haven't spent a single post acknowledging the victims. Not one. Nearly six million Polish citizens, half of them Jewish. Over three million Soviet prisoners of war. Up to half a million Roma. 100,000 members of the Polish intelligentsia murdered in the Intelligenzaktion alone from a kill list compiled before the war began. Not a word from you about any of them. So tell me, Dr Scheil, which document was forged? And do you accept that the crimes the court tried were real? Two simple questions. I'll wait.

The Nuremberg prosecution knew perfectly well that its case was false. US prosecutor Jackson himself admitted this in London in the summer of 1945: "The Germans will certainly accuse all three of our European Allies of adopting policies which forced them to war. The reason I say that is that captured documents of the Foreign Office that I have examined all come down to the claim, 'We have no way out; we must fight; we are encircled; we are being strangled to death.' Now, if the question comes up, what is a judge to do about it? I would say, before one is jugded guilty of being an agressor, we must not only let him deny it, but say we will hear his case. I am quite sure a British or American judge would say to a defendant, 'You may prove your claim'."

@gurnemanz1995 @VoicesofWW2 Some of the marble is now on the Soviet ww2 memorial next to the Brandenburg gate. The rest is well gone

@VoicesofWW2 Please tell me it still looks like this...

"The New Reich Chancellery" in Berlin in color 🎨📸

@SensiblePirate @harukaawake Well the crime problem seems to correlate with skin color

🇯🇵 In Japan we don't need to put locks on all of our Apple products because we won't steal them. I seriously can't even imagine the situation on the right. What are these people thinking...

@__nikskip__ @europa But they fought the war against Germany

@Bendix53930 @europa See, there’s a difference between allies and occupiers, if this is too complex for you, I can‘t help you

@__nikskip__ @europa What are they if they aren’t occupiers?

@Bendix53930 @europa Occupiers??? 😂 get off of russian propaganda as fast as possible!

@goyimfarmer Grade A level Idiot. Fell for the Soviets award.

Michael I von Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, King of Romania

@poparaadnan @__nikskip__ @europa Russia sold Germany the gas and looks like a Neolithic society.

@__nikskip__ @europa Germany would look like neolithic society if it weren't for Russia's cheap gas. I do hope Germany keeps this anti-Russian stance because it's the fastest way to it becoming economically ruined - which it most definitely deserves.

@__nikskip__ @europa He is a traitor because he wants the occupiers to leave?

@europa He’s not speaking for the majority of Germans, I can assure you that. He is a traitor and would sell Germany to Russia if gets the chance to.

@RoemeltA @stein_schreibt @benedikt_kaiser @jbvolkmann Nein natürlich nicht aber vielleicht sollten sie das Israel auch mal nahelegen, die nehmen das scheinbar auch nicht so genau mit den Resolutionen.

@stein_schreibt @benedikt_kaiser @jbvolkmann Eine UN Resolution ist „Unsinn“? So, so…

Ich finde es erstaunlich, wie einige die Freiheit von Christen erst als Thema entdecken, wenn die israelische Polizei einen Fehler macht. Bei systematischer, existentieller Verfolgung unserer Glaubensgeschwister durch Islamisten & Kommunisten wird hingegen geschwiegen. Reminder:

@meaglon3 @MatthiasMdb In der Regel ist jedes Haus über eine Straße erreichbar. Die Mietskaserenen die du meinst kann man sich ja im Prenzlauerberg anschauen.

@Bendix53930 @MatthiasMdb Die Städte waren damals im Regelfall in Blöcke unterteilt. Die Häuser die du meinst waren an den Straßen und die meisten anderen hatt man dahinter versteckt

Warum schönes Bauen mehr mit Lebensgefühl, Zugehörigkeit und kultureller Kontinuität zu tun hat, als heutige Baupolitik oft wahrhaben will, zeigt dieser Blick auf Architektur und Alltag: matthiashelferich.de/aktuelles/unse…

@meaglon3 @MatthiasMdb Achso dann Google doch mal Gründerzeit Haus

@Bendix53930 @MatthiasMdb Hatten sie nicht

@meaglon3 @MatthiasMdb Warum hatten die denn alle Stuck?

@MatthiasMdb Das da sind alles Monumentalbauten. Die Durchschnitlichen Wohnhäuser wurden damals wie heute nach dem Prinzio form follows funktion gebaut

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr Why would they do that? They knew the demands, They knew the deadlines and the implications behind it. And they knew that not sending someone with negotiating powers wouldn’t be accepted. This statement by lipski is a lie he sent his answer to Poland after the talks.

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr So the poles are not pleased with the appeasers that want negotiations and communicate this internally, they don’t sent someone with negotiating powers, knowing that it was demanded, after they announced their will to negotiate to their Allie’s, and they lie about it afterwards.

31. August 1939 – Der polnische Botschafter in London, Raczynski, berichtet von einer ernsten Lage, da die britische Regierung sich weigert, seinem Kurs in den Krieg zu folgen: „Die Situation hier hat sich erneut dramatisch verschärft. Die britische Regierung hat unter dem Einfluss der Appeaser neue Verhandlungen aufgenommen, in der Hoffnung, ein Gleichgewicht zwischen Hitlers Forderungen und Polens vitalen Interessen zu finden.“

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr So what does this mean in your very own words

No, we haven't gone full circle. Scheil's thesis is that Poland saw the war as an 'opportunity' and bears responsibility for its outbreak. Your own documents show the opposite: Poland said yes to negotiations. Poland asked for hours to reply formally. Poland instructed Lipski to refer demands back to Warsaw standard diplomatic procedure. Poland was willing to talk. Germany didn't wait. Germany broadcast 'rejection' before Poland's reply arrived. Germany invaded at dawn. 'Poland knew about the proposals' is not the same as 'Poland started the war.' Knowing about demands and refusing to capitulate to them on a twelve-hour deadline is not aggression. It's sovereignty. Scheil's claim: Poland wanted this war. Your documents: Poland was preparing a formal reply when Germany invaded. Those are opposite things. You've spent three hours proving my case with primary sources. I appreciate the effort.

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr Here

@G_M_Zz @ScheilDr Oh you’ve said that the poles didn’t know about the German proposal I can just quote you, it was less then an hour ago.