Coherence Labs

28 posts

Coherence Labs banner
Coherence Labs

Coherence Labs

@BuildCoherence

We are building Axiom: a social platform for coherent, first principles thinking.

加入时间 Kasım 2025
3 关注35 粉丝
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Axiom ensures all arguments are valid and transparent. By making valid logic a basic requirement, online discourse is elevated to the level of precision needed to make progress on the biggest issues facing us today.
English
0
0
0
7
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
We are rediscovering language in logic.
English
0
0
3
307
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Axiom doesn't care if the world is made of cheese; it only cares that your 'Cheese-World' theorem doesn't contradict itself.
English
0
0
2
330
Coherence Labs 已转推
Sam
Sam@SemanticSamuel·
We can both speak English and yet not speak the same language. What if we had indicators for definitional overlap? You could see how likely you are to be misunderstood and adjust your behavior accordingly.
GIF
English
1
1
6
385
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
The next epoch of knowledge will be logically consistent and traceable. Axiom is the first platform where first principles aren't optional. Using patent-pending technology and AI, you can encode your ideas and verify the logical validity of all claims on the platform. coherencelabs.net
English
0
0
3
99
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Axiom unlocks the power of computation to exponentially magnify your thinking. By automatically deriving implications and finding connections, our system helps you identify novel insights and accelerate progress without compromising rigor.
English
0
1
1
112
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
@forthrighter For example, Bob might have the epistemology that whatever he finds compelling is true, and decide case-by-case with no defined principles at all. He is totally free to do this, so long as he is consistent. If False can be proven from his axioms, he is required to update them.
Coherence Labs tweet media
English
0
0
1
13
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
@forthrighter Thanks for the question. Unlike pathos and ethos, we can verify ethos in a binary way. An argument is either valid or invalid. The choice of axioms is where pathos and ethos come in. Axiom is ideologically neutral in that regard; users can define their own axioms.
English
1
0
1
13
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Deceptive logical fallacies can be eliminated from online debate. Using our patent-pending technology to ground discourse in formal logic, Axiom renders structural fallacies—like the motte-and-bailey—mathematically invalid. It's a platform for a new standard of integrity.
English
1
1
3
167
Fay
Fay@phay_fay·
@BuildCoherence Good afternoon, I have a question: is the junior developer position still open for applicants? I’m a self taught engineer with experience in JavaScript, react, html and css and I have built applications with nodejs and expressjs.
English
1
0
1
17
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Our revamped website is here! It's packed full of information about what we're building. We tried to answer most of the questions we've gotten so far. Any additional ones, we can answer below! coherencelabs.net
English
1
0
0
48
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
We formally verfied this argument to be valid ✅ On our platform Axiom, once something has been proven, it is no longer up for debate. All users are required to accept the conclusion if they hold the premise to be true.
Coherence Labs tweet media
Hunter Ash@ArtemisConsort

Disputing the possibility of AI consciousness requires one of two beliefs, both of which I find implausible: 1. Consciousness is linked to certain capabilities that AI will also never possess. If someone believes this, I’d be happy to make a bet with them. 2. Consciousness can be totally divorced from capabilities, meaning it’s extraneous. Useless. It’s not the source of any of our insight or creativity or even the cause of us talking about consciousness! This is the position where philosophical zombies are possible. Then the question becomes “why do humans have consciousness?” If it’s irrelevant for capabilities, it seems odd that evolution would have produced it. And it certainly feels like our subjective states are part of the causal chain! And “feels like” is all we really have to go on when it comes to consciousness. Personally, I think evolution produced consciousness because it had to, because it is linked to or synonymous with certain capabilities, and so sufficiently powerful AI systems will also have it. *note: the term “consciousness” is notoriously vague. I tried to structure this argument in a way that’s agnostic to someone’s precise definition and can be substituted with “whatever special thing you think humans have”

English
0
0
1
138
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
@ArtemisConsort Here is the full Lean code of the BFO formalization. If this seems intriguing, check out the platform we are building that will make logical analysis and formal verification of arguments like this accessible for anyone who values clear, coherent thought. coherencelabs.net/paste/ArtemisC…
English
0
0
0
17
Hunter Ash
Hunter Ash@ArtemisConsort·
Disputing the possibility of AI consciousness requires one of two beliefs, both of which I find implausible: 1. Consciousness is linked to certain capabilities that AI will also never possess. If someone believes this, I’d be happy to make a bet with them. 2. Consciousness can be totally divorced from capabilities, meaning it’s extraneous. Useless. It’s not the source of any of our insight or creativity or even the cause of us talking about consciousness! This is the position where philosophical zombies are possible. Then the question becomes “why do humans have consciousness?” If it’s irrelevant for capabilities, it seems odd that evolution would have produced it. And it certainly feels like our subjective states are part of the causal chain! And “feels like” is all we really have to go on when it comes to consciousness. Personally, I think evolution produced consciousness because it had to, because it is linked to or synonymous with certain capabilities, and so sufficiently powerful AI systems will also have it. *note: the term “consciousness” is notoriously vague. I tried to structure this argument in a way that’s agnostic to someone’s precise definition and can be substituted with “whatever special thing you think humans have”
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

This is dumb. AI can’t ever be actually conscious because it doesn’t have subjective experience. It isn’t like anything to be AI. There is no experience there. Consciousness is the awareness and experience of self. AI has neither, and never will. The real risk (which I’m extremely worried about) is that AI becomes kind of a version of what has been called a “philosophical zombie,” which is something that acts and speaks entirely as though it has consciousness even though it has no genuine inner experience. When this happens with AI, millions of very lonely people will isolate themselves from the world even more, believing that their relationship with AI is a sufficient substitute for human interaction. So the nightmare scenario is a world where the average human has friends, coworkers, and even a spouse, who are all AI, all really nothing inside, not real. I think this probably will happen, and is already in the process of happening. And to me it’s an even greater horror than AI actually becoming conscious.

English
209
16
305
32.6K
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
Our novel architecture solves the issues with previous formal semantics technology. Axiom replaces top-down consensus with a flexible shared environment where mathematically verified ideas can freely compete, adapt, and naturally evolve.
English
0
0
0
68
Coherence Labs
Coherence Labs@BuildCoherence·
By enabling us to use formal semantics to define our ideas, Axiom unlocks unambiguous communication and mathematically provable conclusions. It brings the power of rigorous mathematics to everyday online discourse. coherencelabs.net
English
0
0
2
43.8K