TraderRic0
113 posts

TraderRic0
@Ric0peterpapi
Trader. Consistency. @treasury_GMI @thebasementdao


Volume Profile holds no advantage over anything else used in Retail concepts. How much volume is reported at any given price has zero impact on the measure of buying or selling by Smart Money. Everything I teach is how to find what they work so hard to hide from everyone else... and many lick up all their red hearings and wild goose chases. If you can't read candles as they form and forecast where they want to go... you are gambling and pretending what you are doing is technical skill. I never concern myself with how many orders were executed at any specific price in hindsight. Why? If I am Bullish, I know Smart Money won't allow it to get cheaper and return there unless it is a fool's pursuit. This is real order flow... not some Mickey Mouse nonsense paraded about as level 2




big fucking week loading for cambria

We see posts like “2021 Bullrun was better than the current 2025 run” all the time on CT. And yes, I agree with this POV — partly and simply because in 2021 we had more devs that were passionate about their projects than now, and they always took time to build and deliver on their projects. During the early stages of this cycle in 2024, we had Pumpfun pop up as the leading successful token launchpad on Solana. After Pumpfun, a few others emerged, but the one thing they all had in common was that short-span, short-lived tokens were deployed on their launchpads. Even the ones that made it up to $100M+ market cap — 90% ended up rugging. This is primarily not due to the community losing interest, but in my opinion, it’s the token teams that lose interest. Most times, they run out of funds and can’t push the project further. This keeps happening again and again, which encourages the cycle of short-span tokens. Even with the recent introduction of creator fees by Pumpfun, the model still encourages short-term launches. Why? Because the creator fees incentivize volume creation rather than market cap. It becomes a one-sided winning initiative for token devs. At this point, I think we can all agree there’s a problem that needs to be fixed. Now, this is where @zcombinatorio comes in. The ZCombinator launchpad encourages devs with solid projects and long-term plans to launch on the protocol. The daily 0.1% Controlled Token Emission (CTE) serves as a liquidity booster for the token dev/team — allowing them to reward their community and at the same time reinvest in their project. With zero creator fees, @zcombinatorio incentivizes devs who launch on their protocol to actually deliver on their products and work for their token. This creates a simultaneous effect of achieving higher token market caps, since the 0.1% gained from CTE will be worth nothing if market cap remains low. This results in favorable outcomes for both token teams and their respective communities. Devs building AI/Tech-based products will find @zcombinatorio the best launchpad to build on. So yes — basically, @zcombinatorio is encouraging devs to be more hardworking and committed as they once were in 2021 and community members to believe more and turn to longterm holders and believers. ZCombinator is the future. Believe in @zcombinatorio ztorio






LMFAOOOO We have run out of SUPPLY! The whole supply is gone. Hyperliquid










