South Carolina Red Line

1.3K posts

South Carolina Red Line banner
South Carolina Red Line

South Carolina Red Line

@SC_RedLine

Tracking South Carolina’s radical leftist and globalist infiltration; putting the pieces together.

South Carolina, U.S.A. 加入时间 Ekim 2024
326 关注200 粉丝
置顶推文
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina Red Line@SC_RedLine·
Great news and you will have my vote! But the “climate change” problem in South Carolina goes deeper than climate research. Here’s what I learned. In SC, climate change policies —aka UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) — are being normalized and incorporated directly into state operations via Sustain SC, an organization jump-started by Google (a major UN SDG cheerleader), and dedicated to “improve South Carolina’s SDG ranking and providing opportunities for businesses in our state to actively commit to these sustainability goals at the local level.” Oh, and spread the ESG system which captures the supply chain, forcing businesses up and down the chain to submit to global UN policies. Sustain SC cooperates with the SC Dept of Commerce; is populated by UN SDG-supporting businesses and progressive conservation groups (local and national); and works in close partnership with Gov. McMaster, the man pledging to put 50% of undeveloped state land out of the grasp of biz & property owners (and into eventual state control?). All those parcels of land being purchased across SC and put into conservation land trusts? Yep, that’s part of it. How much state taxpayer money is involved? I’ll leave that to the follow-the-money detectives. SC Office of Resilience (SCOR)’s Resilience and Risk Reduction plan for the state is a important source of embedding climate change policy at the state organization level. Be sure to dig into the footnote references. Sustain SC, in partnership with The Shi Institute for Sustainable Communities at Furman University (furman.edu/shi-institute/), runs the Sustainability Leadership Initiative (sustainsouthcarolina.org/sli) (SLI), bringing business executives, conservation orgs, and state officials into the climate change/UN SDG belief system and social/biz circle. Money, opportunity, and access are their diplomas. These people shape our policies, aligning them with global plans. And there is RISE (Resilience, Innovation, and Sustainability through Education) a United Nations Regional Centre of Expertise (RCE) on Education for Sustainable Development operating in Georgetown County, SC. They “educate communities” in the SDGs. (coastal.edu/rise/about/) These are among the key beneficiaries from climate change policies in our state. This state activity is aided by environmental justice activism grassroots-community building that took place via SC DES & DPH & Energy Office’s EJ trainings before Trump cut the funding. It is spread to many churches as Biblically sound. The losers here are small businesses, taxpayers, and citizens who understand that the UN SDGs represent an agenda to transform South Carolina’s (and the US) economic and political systems to align with European systems for the new era of global governance. The method is through incremental policy change. All of our traditional political systems are targeted for replacement. Our economy will be moved from capitalism based on GDP to a “wellbeing economy” where *everything* is recycled (circular economy) and citizen satisfaction and social relationships are the measure of a nation’s prosperity. 🤪 American liberties, norms, and values will be forced to conform to EU standards, i.e, collectivism over individualism, state secular spirituality instead of religion, government ruling over subjects instead of the one designed by our Founding Fathers, LGBTQ+, “gender identity,” hate speech laws (censorship) open borders, DEI, socialized health care, “tiny homes,” less red meat consumption, ESG, 15-minute cities with “shared vehicles,” etc. Proponents of the SDGs never go into the hardship their drastic energy policies will cause as they tell us that we need to change our consumption and production practices (except for the ruling class). They assure us “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.” If you can put a stop to it, you have my vote and that of every patriotic conservative.
English
1
5
15
1K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Nick Reynolds
Nick Reynolds@IAmNickReynolds·
Democratic candidate for governor Jermaine Johnson (@Dr_JLJohnson) tells me he will, in fact, be filing for governor on Monday after a surprise announcement last night at a Sumter meeting led some to believe he was dropping out of the race.
English
3
4
13
3.4K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Nick Reynolds
Nick Reynolds@IAmNickReynolds·
Sat down with Lindsey Graham a few weeks ago for about an hour to try and figure out one simple question: why does it seem nobody can beat this guy? The people trying to do so made their case. Some interesting nuggets in here if you have the time. postandcourier.com/politics/linds…
English
11
19
25
9.3K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
ABC News 4
ABC News 4@ABCNews4·
South Carolina Treasurer Curtis Loftis announced Friday that he will seek reelection. Read more: bit.ly/4boyCH4
ABC News 4 tweet media
English
0
1
3
419
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Adam Morgan
Adam Morgan@RepAdamMorgan·
📢 Yes! End license requirements for destructive, leftwing, time-wasting Ed programs. I saw firsthand on the House Ed Committee these grad program directors testifying against ANY good legislation. They are Leftists peddling cultural Marxism and corroding American education.
NAVI@NAVIvalues

“It [was] easier for me, as an administrator, to teach somebody in the nuts and bolts of teaching than to try and deprogram a graduate from a school of education.” @MrDanielBuck of @AEI talks realities of how far gone from the science of teaching colleges of education are. See our entire webinar on the topic here - youtube.com/watch?v=7H2yxo…

English
2
9
25
900
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
William Meijer
William Meijer@williameijer·
Message from a German friend: Germany is over. If you have time, read the following post from Reddit. Bear in mind, Germany's only resource was always education and good institutions. r/DePi Experiences as a teacher at a school with a high proportion of refugees - it is even worse than you think Hello everyone, I studied mathematics and am currently working as a secondary school teacher in the Ruhr area, partly due to the current precarious labor market situation. The proportion of refugees at my school, as at many other schools here in the region, is quite high. Most refugees are taught in separate integration classes, as integration into regular classes is simply not possible due to the desolate level of education. I teach two such integration classes several times a week and just wanted to share my experiences with you here. Even before starting my current job, I was extremely critical of the current migration, but my experiences in the teaching profession make my worst fears at the time seem like a benevolent utopia. For context: A large proportion of the integration classes consist of Marrocans born in Spain, but Syrians, Afghans and Roma are also strongly represented. The rest is a wild potpourri of Ukrainians and refugees from other Arab or Muslim countries such as Lebanon or Somalia. One class consists mainly of younger students between 11 and 13 years of age, the other class consists mainly of teenagers around 16 years of age. Now a small summary of my observations: In about half of the classes there is no significant literacy in their own language, just over half understand, even after years in the local school system, in about as good a German as I understand Mandarin. At least in math (I can only judge the other subjects to a very limited extent), the level of education is an absolute fiasco, even among older students. Truly the simplest arithmetic problems (5+6 or 7-4) are already very difficult. The cause often seems to be cognitive, because even if I illustrate the numbers with objects, many students are unable to solve corresponding tasks. It is currently Ramadan. Ukrainian students who do not fast must leave the room if they want to have a drink or eat. On the one hand, this is a rule imposed by the classes themselves, but on the other hand it is also tolerated or even actively supported by large parts of the other teaching staff and the social worker. Some male students refuse to sit next to female students for religious reasons. This is also tolerated. Fights are commonplace and that is no exaggeration. In fact, there is at least one fight almost every day. There are no properly maintained school folders or generally a careful handling of school materials. Most come to class wearing only the clothes they wear on their bodies. About half of the class with the older students is always delayed by at least 10 minutes at the first lesson, or sometimes 20 or 30 minutes. Even after the breaks, the class is actually only 10 minutes late each time. During Ramadan, also tolerated by other school staff, a good proportion sleep regularly in class by placing their head on the table. Female students are regularly labeled with highly obscene terms. The punishment of such statements either does not take place at all or is so restrained that repetition is encouraged. On parent-teacher conferences, 90 percent of parents, even after several years of residence in Germany, can only communicate via interpreters. A few days ago, some students proudly told me what new cell phone models their siblings and parents have, which, mind you, receive almost exclusively transfer payments. Female colleagues generally have it more difficult than my gender counterparts, who are usually at least rudimentarily respected. Some students often do not show up at school for months without apology. A rejection of other religions is very clear in many situations. For group work in other subjects that spans weeks, the results have a scope that can be achieved by those with normal abilities within five minutes. There is no mixing with other students. You like to keep to yourself. Even among refugees, groups usually form according to their respective origins. With all the negative impressions, there are a few positive experiences. A handful of students are actually making an effort and progress. These students are also the only reason why work doesn't seem completely pointless. I myself try to counteract this to the best of my ability, but this is hardly possible if there is no support from the staff and the school administration. I have already capitulated on some points because a corresponding commitment only breaks your nerves without changing anything. Many of the older students are leaving our education system anytime soon, and with that, the state is losing pretty much the only way to exert any influence. I fear that the situation in other schools often looks little better. This leads us to send school leavers into the wild year after year who neither write, read nor master the most basic primary school mathematics. Such people are not fit for any kind of work and are doomed to languish in our welfare system for life. Muslim and African students, in particular, often have an absurd number of siblings by German standards. If one assumes that this reproduction rate will not break with the current generation, but perhaps even increase given the fantastic conditions here in Germany compared to their countries of origin (not for locals, but certainly for people from countries with a per capita GDP of $800), the problems are compounded exponentially. I lack any imagination as to how the catastrophe that lies ahead could be averted in any way, and this is increasingly frustrating me. Just wanted to share this with you. Thanks to those who stuck with it until the end of the text and gave themselves my whining.
English
463
2K
10.5K
700K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Aaron Day
Aaron Day@AaronRDay·
PART 2: THE WHITE HOUSE JUST RELEASED THE BLUEPRINT Trump's "National AI Legislative Framework" dropped today. 6 "guiding principles." Every single one builds a new gate between you and the open internet. 1/ "Age-assurance requirements" for every AI platform. There is no way to verify age without collecting identity. Government ID. Biometric scan. Third-party verification database. They just mandated digital ID for the internet and called it child safety. 2/ "Commercially reasonable" is doing all the heavy lifting. That phrase gives the FTC blank-check authority to define what verification looks like after the law passes. You won't know the rules until they're enforced against you. 3/ Federal preemption of state AI laws. Your state legislature no longer has a say. But they carved out one exception -- states can still enforce laws against child sexual abuse material. That's it. Everything else belongs to Washington now. 4/ "Preventing censorship and protecting free speech" is listed as a guiding principle. The same framework that sunsets Section 230 and creates four paths to sue anyone who builds an AI. The government is defining free speech by making speech legally lethal to host. 5/ Kratsios and Sacks are pushing Congress to pass this "this year." No extended debate. No public comment period on the framework itself. A 300-page bill and a White House directive in the same week. This is a coordinated legislative blitz. The Blackburn bill is the weapon. Today's framework is the order to fire. Same week. Same agenda. Different press releases. They are building a permission-based internet and telling you it's innovation.
English
6
39
87
2.5K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Aaron Day
Aaron Day@AaronRDay·
KLAUS SCHWAB COULD NOT HAVE WRITTEN A BETTER AI BILL THAN THE ONE REPUBLICANS JUST DROPPED The "TRUMP AMERICA AI Act" is 300 pages of centralized AI control disguised as innovation policy. 1/ Preempts state AI laws. Your state can no longer protect you. One federal rulebook controlled by Washington replaces 50 state legislatures overnight. 2/ Creates a mandatory "duty of care" enforced by the FTC. Unelected bureaucrats now decide what AI can and cannot say. 3/ Requires frontier AI companies to report to the Department of Homeland Security and pass Department of Energy evaluations BEFORE deployment. Government permission to innovate. 4/ Mandates quarterly job displacement reports to the Department of Labor. They're not tracking losses to help you. They're building a workforce surveillance database. 5/ Sunsets Section 230 in two years. Every platform becomes legally liable for user speech. The largest speech suppression mechanism ever passed by a Republican Congress. This is not deregulation. It's the Great Reset wearing a red hat.
Aaron Day tweet media
English
118
1.1K
1.9K
54.8K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Palmetto State Watch
Palmetto State Watch@WatchPalmetto·
What happens when SC legislators blow up their own election agency and then pretend to be the heroes cleaning it up? 🧐 A Senate staffer helped the former elections director bypass the legislature's own budget decision. A House chairman's office sent the email that gave the deal cover. The vendor's lobbyist was copied on the endorsement. The contract grew by around $8.5 million in the dark. The director was arrested on eleven charges. And the one person who actually showed up with a mop and started making people uncomfortable? She was forced out by the same legislative forces that helped create the mess in the first place. This is not incompetence. This is a pattern. We have the emails, the receipts, and the names: palmettostatewatchfoundation.com/2026/03/19/leg…
English
7
23
35
1.8K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Nick Reynolds
Nick Reynolds@IAmNickReynolds·
Folks are being told there is an agreement in principle but that an issue with the computer system is delaying a printing of the amendment. There should be a vote at some point, we just don't know when right now.
English
1
1
3
2K
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina, I’ve encountered all these topics on SC ed websites 2-3 clicks from the home pages, plus all the authors that he listed pepper articles by ed faculty and grad students! Our Colleges of Ed are factories for “woke,” injected directly into K-12 and then serving as a finishing school for those “college-ready” students when they come for degrees. Honestly, our medical colleges do even greater damage. Much worse.
NAVI@NAVIvalues

“It [was] easier for me, as an administrator, to teach somebody in the nuts and bolts of teaching than to try and deprogram a graduate from a school of education.” @MrDanielBuck of @AEI talks realities of how far gone from the science of teaching colleges of education are. See our entire webinar on the topic here - youtube.com/watch?v=7H2yxo…

English
1
6
10
1.8K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger@shellenberger·
Energy prices are spiking and stocks are crashing because Iran bombed a massive liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar. But the underlying problem has been decades of opposition from Democrats to natural gas, which led Biden to ban the construction of new LNG plants.
Michael Shellenberger tweet media
English
65
191
909
107.7K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Palmetto State Watch
Palmetto State Watch@WatchPalmetto·
From a long term contract with the AG’s office to sitting on a multimillion dollar state settlement, one person has been among the biggest beneficiaries of the South Carolina Attorney General’s office. It appears he’s now spreading his government-derived wealth among the good ole’ boys that hold office in South Carolina.   Since receiving a cut of the $75 million Plutonium Settlement in 2020, his donations total over $388k to Republicans and nearly $65k to Democrats.   That’s over $452,000 dollars in just five years.   Find out about how Randy Lowell (of Burr & Forman, formerly Willoughby & Hoefer), along with his businesses and law firm has been fueling the Uniparty in South Carolina: palmettostatewatchfoundation.com/2026/03/13/ele…
Palmetto State Watch tweet media
English
3
32
39
3.8K
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
America First
America First@KihneSheila·
This happened in SOUTH CAROLINA!👇 Parents reported to the state government by school staff-- for NOT allowing their son to pretend to be a girl at school. But it shouldn't be a surprise In South Carolina, the State Library promotes the radical American Library Association's agenda which advocates "affirming gender" of kids in the library -- even telling them how to hide their "identity" from their parents! The SC State Library TODAY-- links the ALA's "Supporting Trans* teens in the Public Library" presentation (see pictures) This instructs library staff to ask questions like: "If your parent/guardian calls, what name & pronoun should I use?" "Is it still okay to use your old pronoun when I'm talking to your mom?" The ALA also "encourages library workers to serve as allies and advocates for gender and sexual orientation diverse children and adolescents in schools" Why is this left-wing institution still so present in our government? Why are libraries forced to ONLY HIRE FT librarians who hold a master's degree from an ALA accredited program? @SCHouseGOP @scsenategop @henrymcmaster @AGAlanWilson @RalphNorman @NancyMace @PamelaEvette
America First tweet mediaAmerica First tweet mediaAmerica First tweet media
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol

🚨#BREAKING: A South Carolina mother just shared one of the most disturbing school gender transition stories I've read in a long time. Her 14-year-old son attended Beech Springs Middle School in Spartanburg SC. For OVER A YEAR, he was changing into girls' clothing at school, and changing back before his mom picked him up. It was apparently a daily operation, coordinating with another student to bring the clothes, multiple bathroom trips, and deliberate concealment from his parents every single day. Multiple staff members at school had to have seen this. You don't pull off daily clothing changes in a middle school without teachers noticing. But NOBODY called home to tell his parents. Nobody except one teacher. One teacher the previous year did her job, she noticed, she called the mom, and she followed South Carolina law H.4624, which explicitly requires school staff to notify parents when a student expresses gender identity confusion. That call is the only reason the family found out at all. They got their son into gender-related counseling over the summer of 2025. They were engaged, they were involved, they were actively trying to help their kid navigate something difficult. Then the school went silent again. The pattern continued into the next school year and nobody said a word. Fast forward to February 2026. The mom gets her son's hair cut. He cries in class. His teacher sits with him for 10 minutes while he tells her everything, that he wants long hair like a girl, that his parents won't affirm his gender identity, all of it. Again, South Carolina law H.4624 exists for exactly this moment. When a student expresses gender identity distress to a school employee, the law says the school SHALL notify the parents. But the teacher didn't call the mom. She called DSS. That same day, February 13, 2026, she filed a child protective services report against this family for "medical neglect..." Medical neglect because A) the boy allegedly coughed up blood and wasn't receiving care. B) Mental injury because the parents won't affirm a gender transition. And... I'm not even kidding C) making him do "manly chores." The mom asked her son what that meant. He said "cutting the grass." DSS showed up at their home on Valentine's Day weekend. Two days later, the family took their son and got a chest x-ray. His lungs were completely clear. He never coughed up blood. The allegation was fabricated. On February 19th, five days after the report was filed, DSS closed the case. Unfounded. No evidence of medical neglect. No evidence of mental injury. Nothing. So just to recap... A teacher had a 10-minute conversation with a 14-year-old, decided his parents' refusal to affirm a gender transition constituted child abuse, invented or wildly exaggerated a medical claim to make the report actionable, violated state law by never calling the parents, and weaponized DSS on a family over Valentine's Day weekend. And the school's response? The principal wrote back defending the teacher. Called the DSS report "appropriate based on medical neglect suspicion." The report that was closed completely unfounded in five days. The report based on a medical claim that was disproven with a chest x-ray. That report. Appropriate The principal also mentioned that staff had received "gender identity training" and that the school followed "applicable South Carolina statutes." But the H.4624 violation, the actual law that was actually broken, was never addressed. Not once. The superintendent promised a full investigation by a Chief Administrative Officer. Instead, the principal, the direct supervisor of the teacher in question, provided the only written response, and used it to defend her own employee. This school watched a student secretly change genders during the school day for over a year and chose not to tell his mother. That's not an accident. You don't miss daily clothing changes in a middle school. They saw it. They allowed it. They made a decision, collectively and repeatedly, that the parents didn't need to know. Then when that same family's values came up in a conversation, the response wasn't to pick up the phone and call mom like the law requires. The response was to report them for child abuse. The silence for a year and the DSS report aren't two separate events. They're the same event. They both reflect the same institutional decision: we know better than these parents, and we will act accordingly, whether that means hiding things from them or weaponizing the state against them. This family did everything right. They got their son counseling. They stayed engaged. They were present. They got a chest x-ray to disprove a fabricated allegation. DSS came into their home, looked at how they parent, and walked out five days later with literally nothing. But the school is STILL calling it appropriate. The mom has filed complaints with both the school and the South Carolina Department of Education. The school defended the teacher. The state has been silent for over a month. Her son is now homeschooled, by the way and she says he's thriving. The school literally weaponized the state against a family for cutting their son's hair. Let that sink in.

English
0
4
10
464
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Rep. Thomas Beach
Rep. Thomas Beach@ThomasBeach·
Here’s my amendment. You can see who spoke against it and how they voted.
Rep. Thomas Beach tweet media
English
2
3
16
318
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
The Post and Courier
The Post and Courier@postandcourier·
South Carolina’s electric cooperatives have unanimously approved a deal that would make mandatory five distinct consumer protections for data center development. postandcourier.com/politics/sc-el…
English
0
2
2
818
South Carolina Red Line 已转推
Rep. Thomas Beach
Rep. Thomas Beach@ThomasBeach·
Scary stuff from a middle school in SPARTANBURG. I pushed an amendment to require teachers to notify parents about gender transitioning at school, but Davey Hiott and the rest of the GOP caucus said no.
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol

🚨#BREAKING: A South Carolina mother just shared one of the most disturbing school gender transition stories I've read in a long time. Her 14-year-old son attended Beech Springs Middle School in Spartanburg SC. For OVER A YEAR, he was changing into girls' clothing at school, and changing back before his mom picked him up. It was apparently a daily operation, coordinating with another student to bring the clothes, multiple bathroom trips, and deliberate concealment from his parents every single day. Multiple staff members at school had to have seen this. You don't pull off daily clothing changes in a middle school without teachers noticing. But NOBODY called home to tell his parents. Nobody except one teacher. One teacher the previous year did her job, she noticed, she called the mom, and she followed South Carolina law H.4624, which explicitly requires school staff to notify parents when a student expresses gender identity confusion. That call is the only reason the family found out at all. They got their son into gender-related counseling over the summer of 2025. They were engaged, they were involved, they were actively trying to help their kid navigate something difficult. Then the school went silent again. The pattern continued into the next school year and nobody said a word. Fast forward to February 2026. The mom gets her son's hair cut. He cries in class. His teacher sits with him for 10 minutes while he tells her everything, that he wants long hair like a girl, that his parents won't affirm his gender identity, all of it. Again, South Carolina law H.4624 exists for exactly this moment. When a student expresses gender identity distress to a school employee, the law says the school SHALL notify the parents. But the teacher didn't call the mom. She called DSS. That same day, February 13, 2026, she filed a child protective services report against this family for "medical neglect..." Medical neglect because A) the boy allegedly coughed up blood and wasn't receiving care. B) Mental injury because the parents won't affirm a gender transition. And... I'm not even kidding C) making him do "manly chores." The mom asked her son what that meant. He said "cutting the grass." DSS showed up at their home on Valentine's Day weekend. Two days later, the family took their son and got a chest x-ray. His lungs were completely clear. He never coughed up blood. The allegation was fabricated. On February 19th, five days after the report was filed, DSS closed the case. Unfounded. No evidence of medical neglect. No evidence of mental injury. Nothing. So just to recap... A teacher had a 10-minute conversation with a 14-year-old, decided his parents' refusal to affirm a gender transition constituted child abuse, invented or wildly exaggerated a medical claim to make the report actionable, violated state law by never calling the parents, and weaponized DSS on a family over Valentine's Day weekend. And the school's response? The principal wrote back defending the teacher. Called the DSS report "appropriate based on medical neglect suspicion." The report that was closed completely unfounded in five days. The report based on a medical claim that was disproven with a chest x-ray. That report. Appropriate The principal also mentioned that staff had received "gender identity training" and that the school followed "applicable South Carolina statutes." But the H.4624 violation, the actual law that was actually broken, was never addressed. Not once. The superintendent promised a full investigation by a Chief Administrative Officer. Instead, the principal, the direct supervisor of the teacher in question, provided the only written response, and used it to defend her own employee. This school watched a student secretly change genders during the school day for over a year and chose not to tell his mother. That's not an accident. You don't miss daily clothing changes in a middle school. They saw it. They allowed it. They made a decision, collectively and repeatedly, that the parents didn't need to know. Then when that same family's values came up in a conversation, the response wasn't to pick up the phone and call mom like the law requires. The response was to report them for child abuse. The silence for a year and the DSS report aren't two separate events. They're the same event. They both reflect the same institutional decision: we know better than these parents, and we will act accordingly, whether that means hiding things from them or weaponizing the state against them. This family did everything right. They got their son counseling. They stayed engaged. They were present. They got a chest x-ray to disprove a fabricated allegation. DSS came into their home, looked at how they parent, and walked out five days later with literally nothing. But the school is STILL calling it appropriate. The mom has filed complaints with both the school and the South Carolina Department of Education. The school defended the teacher. The state has been silent for over a month. Her son is now homeschooled, by the way and she says he's thriving. The school literally weaponized the state against a family for cutting their son's hair. Let that sink in.

English
9
46
121
13.9K