@tern_inca what do you call two cucks who get together? do they uncuck themselves in the process?
English
ArdiG
121 posts
Heartwarming both men and women are doing cuck posting now
saila@sailaunderscore
They’re making blackpills for women now
English
The utter disaster of an intelligent account revealing itself to be a beautiful person
priscilla (alt)@seashell_luvr
Spring cleaning my life 🧹🧹🧹
English
@hopes_revenge Aella truly is some kind of undersea slug operating on tiny levers inside some humanoid robot that everyone keeps mistaking for a real ensouled person
English
imagine finding your Love in the slutcloud . a small glimmering whorish fleck in the infinitesimal constellation of milky effluvial jism
it's beautiful.
Aella@Aella_Girl
Glosso has a slutcloud function, where you can add people you've had sex with and it makes a visualization of all the sex connections between everyone. Here's my slutcloud:
English
@sanjehorah Toxic knowledge that really should remain concealed. The only way to find love after learning this is to run in the opposite direction and whimsymaxx
English
i might start watching andrew tate videos tbh
this man has one of the best intuitive understandings of the discursive nature of power
tate claims that as a man during courtship the woman has all the power. the man only has power after the woman has sex with him
a woman really only begins to need you after she has sex with you. she needs you to be nice to her and call her back, because she doesn't want to feel like a whore, and if you pull away she'll try harder to draw you back
it seems trite but it's not just talking about emotional power to determine how the other person feels. its a very discursive understanding of power as being the one with the ability to retroactionally determine what an event or action meant
if the girl agrees to sleep with you, then all your efforts wooing her over is just a demonstration of your ability to satisfy her, if she doesn't, then you're a loser. who you are as a person is determined by her choice to have sex with you
if a guy won't text and call and treat you well after sex, then you're just a whore, you had a one night stand, you meant nothing. if he's nice to you and spends time with you and takes you on dates even though he has nothing "further" to gain then well it's just love at first night
i mean tate can't possibly be more evil than foucault, can he?
Iron Tate@irontateHQ
Andrew Tate on how to tell if a girl is a suitable long term partner: “After you sleep together reduce your attention by 65%” “Shorter replies, more delays etc…”
English
@sanjehorah "the way to neutralise and counter sadism is to basically show the other that their destruction of you didnt destroy you. to hold frame."
I don't understand, is this an instruction directed towards Tate or towards his women?
English
is tate a sadist? everyone can tell he acts as sadistic to his women as possible.
but the point of sadism is to see that the other is not destroyed by your destruction. it is a failure of women that they are so easily destroyed
the way to neutralise and counter sadism is to basically show the other that their destruction of you didnt destroy you. to hold frame.
because a woman's hysterical aggression and shittests are a demand for a better master. to hold frame against a woman's hysteria is the central tenet of game in the most traditional sense
where tate goes wrong is that he thinks holding frame is to assert your Will harder until it dominates the other's. what i think it should be is: don't buy into their frame of hobbesian rivalry and hatred. respond with schopenhaurian compassion, so you can surpass the endless struggle of Will against Will
but hysteria is a demand for a BETTER master, not a demand to be dominated. where most men fail at "game" when they try to hold frame is that they think being stubborn like a wall to maintain impose their frame on the woman is what it means to not get longhoused.
but sex is knowledge and we seek to destroy the objet petit a and to know fully is to destroy fully so if a man responds predictably unyieldingly a woman can "know" him and have him destroyed in her mind
hysteria is a demand for a better master but her hysteria shows she already sees you as her master (it's already a given, relax) so more than that her hysteria is a demand for you to show your ability to surpass yourself, to prove your capacity for love and grace and compassion and exceed the "inevitability" of Will against Will
sanje horah@sanjehorah
i might start watching andrew tate videos tbh this man has one of the best intuitive understandings of the discursive nature of power tate claims that as a man during courtship the woman has all the power. the man only has power after the woman has sex with him a woman really only begins to need you after she has sex with you. she needs you to be nice to her and call her back, because she doesn't want to feel like a whore, and if you pull away she'll try harder to draw you back it seems trite but it's not just talking about emotional power to determine how the other person feels. its a very discursive understanding of power as being the one with the ability to retroactionally determine what an event or action meant if the girl agrees to sleep with you, then all your efforts wooing her over is just a demonstration of your ability to satisfy her, if she doesn't, then you're a loser. who you are as a person is determined by her choice to have sex with you if a guy won't text and call and treat you well after sex, then you're just a whore, you had a one night stand, you meant nothing. if he's nice to you and spends time with you and takes you on dates even though he has nothing "further" to gain then well it's just love at first night i mean tate can't possibly be more evil than foucault, can he?
English
@drorlb @mattparlmer no, he who has a monopoly on violence is the state
English
@mattparlmer And they're going to be totally surprised when the actual state will want to have a word about that.
Hint: the state has a monopoly on violence.
English
Open secret that the big AI labs see themselves as emergent state-like entities in the vein of the distributed polities in “Diamond Age” or “Terra Ignota”, which is pretty funny bc staff at said labs always seem surprised when state-like dynamics such as internal politics crop up
English
@Concubinist There is something generous in cultivating hatred for other people
English
True humility is in hating others
Natural Philosophy@Naturalphilosy
“There's a lot of narcissism in self-hatred.” — David Foster Wallace
English
@archipelag0_man history but does not have to. Which then prompts following question: is there something about history that a more universal textual genre like the essay fails to capture precisely because it is more universal, that might come through in narrative accounts for example?
English
@archipelag0_man This is really insightful, but to what extent can that kind of understanding still be called “historical” rather than anthropological? The essay might be the best form for conveying understanding of the human condition more generally, which might take its material from
English
wait. meeking out an eager existence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
serene@armourgraces
ekeing out a meagre existence >>>>>
English