class

101 posts

class banner
class

class

@classpath

Quant developer Crypto trading enthusiast

加入时间 Mart 2016
102 关注288 粉丝
Juke
Juke@juke10x·
@therobotjames Nice. How does it compare to just investing $10K in spx over the same period?
English
4
0
1
437
Robot James 🤖🏖
Robot James 🤖🏖@therobotjames·
three dead simple edges in macro etfs you could trade with a goddamn potato. . . . if you understand how edge is created in markets, you can do the simplest most neanderthal stuff and make money. i’m going to show you three dead simple edges that you can trade in spy and tlt.
Robot James 🤖🏖 tweet media
English
17
40
672
79K
class
class@classpath·
Smoothing usually decreases cov(a,r), as it weights past (less relevant) data more. But, it will also decrease σ_a (noise in your alpha). As long as the σ_a decreases more than cov(a,r), your smoother will boost ic. TLDR: Smooth alphas to boost ic, let optimizer handle turnover
English
0
0
1
42
class
class@classpath·
As far as I understand. Smoothing alphas can: 1) Reduce turnover 2) Increase ic For 1, as ceph points out, an optimizer can do this (and probably should). But an optimizer cannot do 2. why? a=alpha, r=return ic(a, r) = cov(a,r) / (σ_a * σ_r)
Robot James 🤖🏖@therobotjames

@macrocephalopod @NewRiverInvest @robertmartin88 @witchqueendot @stevehouf @Mtrl_Scientist 👋 Say you've got some volatile alpha that explains step ahead returns. And you wanna smooth it cos real world. And you observe decay in IC for increasing half life of smoothing. But you also prefer the more autocorrelated alpha. How do you think about the tradeoff?

English
1
0
1
117
class
class@classpath·
@SystemicStratHL To push back on the macro view a bit if you look at S&P's forward PE, its ~21x today, which isn't cheap, but not particularly high either.
English
1
0
1
198
Systemic Strategies
Systemic Strategies@SystemicStratHL·
Macro predictions and game plan. It seems I've been spot on over the past 1-2 years on general trends that played out, so I'll share what I plan to do personally. 1. BTC is going to underperform everything in the medium term. Reason: BTC has proved itself not to be a good hedge against inflation and world chaos. Nothing new is expected from the 'crypto president' and the next administration probably won't be as complacent. Also, DATs are going to have to sell their leveraged BTC at some point. It's still a long way to go, but everyone is watching and knows it will come eventually. 2. US stocks are probably going to find a reason to have one last rally to ATH or near it — just enough to trigger some final momentum buying before the rope is cut and we start the generational crash we thought could never happen again. Reason: The Iran situation is going to have a very significant impact on inflation. This will make it very unlikely for the FED to be able to cut rates in the short/medium term. Investors are going to realize that 1) stocks are overpriced (high PE ratios, leverage, etc.) and 2) there is no safety net anymore. So it will naturally fall. Then, in the medium/long term, the FED will be forced to lower interest rates, print again, and we will probably recover some — to the detriment of the USD. Game plan: > Short BTC (self-evident) > Wait for a new ATH on stocks or a few months trading near ATH with momentum funds buying in, then start buying volatility ETFs as they will compound nicely in a crash (e.g. VXX) > Buy up gold and silver on pullbacks, as they should outperform due to global instability and the medium-term resumption of money printing. Thinking about how to engineer a vault that could reflect this view, and offer some added alpha to it. Would it be something you would be interested in? Also lmk where you think I'm wrong in my view 🙏
English
19
4
87
4K
class
class@classpath·
@stalequant By "sees" the TWAP do you mean with public or non-public information?
English
1
0
0
79
class
class@classpath·
@imotw2 We know thats ur burner otw
English
0
0
3
284
otw2
otw2@imotw2·
You can’t be serious😭
Vladic@Vladic_ETH

PROBABILITY ARBITRAGE: HOW TO BEAT POLYMARKET USING DERIBIT OPTIONS Trading "Bitcoin Up or Down" on feelings is a casino. Trading them through options math is a systematic business. The strategy is simple: Deribit knows the future better than retail on Polymarket. The options market contains the volatility models of market makers like Galaxy and Wintermute. Our task is to export this knowledge into the inefficient Polymarket order book. 1) The Fundamental Idea Polymarket Up/Down markets are essentially binary options > If Price > Strike: Pay $1 > If Price < Strike: Pay $0 The price (e.g., 55 cents) is the implied probability (55%) Polymarket is driven by the crowd. Deribit is driven by giants using complex volatility models. If the Deribit model shows a 60% probability of an upside move, but Polymarket trades at 50 cents, you have found a Positive EV trade with ~20% ROI. 2) The Math To find the fair probability, we use a modified Black-Scholes formula for binary options. We need the Probability of expiring ITM. Formula for P(Up): Variables: > F (Forward Price): Futures price > K (Strike): The target price on Polymarket. > T (Time): Time to expiration in years. > σ : The hardest part - Implied Volatility (IV) 3) The Data Pipeline You cannot just scrape IV from the Deribit interface because there are no options expiring in 15 minutes. You need to build a Volatility Surface. Algorithm: • Snapshot: Capture the entire Deribit options book every 5-10 seconds. • Fitting: Build a Volatility Smile curve using an SVI model or cubic splines. • Interpolation: Interpolate σ for our specific time and strike • Calculation: Plug the resulting σ into the (d2) formula to get the Fair Price 4) Execution and Risks Example Trade: • Model: Calculates N(d2) = 0.62$ • Market: YES shares trade at $0.54$. • Edge: 0.08 • Action: Limit buy Pitfalls: > Spread & Fees: Your model must account for friction. If Edge < 2-3%, the trade is unprofitable. > Drift: On 15-minute frames, Forward is close to Spot, but during high volatility, the difference is critical. Always use perpetual contract data to calibrate. > Latency: The bot must react within milliseconds of a Deribit book update. You are not guessing where Bitcoin will go. You are arbitraging the inefficiency between a trillion-dollar professional options market and a retail prediction market This is pure quant trading

English
14
4
127
22K
midpricedog
midpricedog@midpricedog·
So nice to have a conversation with your entire second brain and query notes with natural language rather than page through search bar results with CTRL+F + click (or page through physical paper notes)
midpricedog tweet media
English
4
0
11
827
m1ha5
m1ha5@m1ha313·
@systematicls The hardest thing in computer science are “cache consistency and naming things”
English
1
0
1
25
class
class@classpath·
@midpricedog Why is this simpsons paradox? Are men applying to easier departments to get into?
English
1
0
0
67
Murcielago
Murcielago@sthlmlondon·
@classpath Hi! Currently working on something similar. Can I DM you?
English
1
0
0
17
class
class@classpath·
I doubted this claim so I priced the second contract (btc hits 100k in Nov) with a monte carlo. Polymarket: 40% for YES My model: 40.7% for YES
English
2
0
6
2.3K
midpricedog
midpricedog@midpricedog·
See also: The Gambler Who Cracked The Horse Racing Code. archive.is/mtL1h Its funny seeing Bill Benter mentioned after all these years. ~7 years ago, I read about this guy Spring semester in my sophomore dorm room, 1 month out from starting my SWE internship at a OMS/EMS vendor. I was absolutely enamored with his work and read the article multiple times. It was a major spark for further reading and my career path.
fdf@0xfdf

@bennpeifert Instead of a book, I would suggest William Benter's "Computer Based Horse Race Handicapping and Wagering System: A Report". It's a short, 16 page paper. It's a better first course in the spirit and practice of quant trading than almost all books about actual quant trading.

English
2
2
18
2.9K
Goon
Goon@GryptoGoon·
Moving my notifications/control of my bots from discord to telegram is the best decision I’ve made since I got into using baby wipes
English
6
0
32
3.1K
class
class@classpath·
@imotw2 Its always a good day when otw posts trading content
English
1
0
2
190
otw2
otw2@imotw2·
edges are not monolithic. their lifespan is determined by the economic frictions that create them and the barriers that protect them from competition. thanks for reading, and have a good weekend lads. /fin
English
6
0
63
4.2K
otw2
otw2@imotw2·
a thread on different kinds of edges, why the disappear, and why they sometimes don’t 1/n
English
17
79
679
102K
class
class@classpath·
@xmgnr chin up king
English
0
0
0
585
major
major@xmgnr·
ok finally did my eom marks (but marked to nov 3 / today) seems like we have now lost 20% of entire nw in 3 weeks cool cool to put this is perspective this was about 6mo of pnl i suppose it could be a lot worse but honestly im somewhat upset rn
English
13
0
299
49.4K
DGN Quant
DGN Quant@DegenQuant·
@yenwod_ How it feels to say bid hit, quote lifted
DGN Quant tweet media
English
1
0
6
536
yenwod
yenwod@yenwod_·
Hyperliquid and Polymarket both have markets on Monad's token price, one as a perp, the other a binary. The two prices move in interesting ways. Observations: 1. Volatility realized by Hyperliquid's contract (15-minute bars) was much higher at listing, but converged with Polymarket contract implied volatility after the first week of trading. 2. If you use Hyperliquid to construct an implied price for each Polymarket contract from current price and RV, the price paths are similar. 3. Under this simple model, both Polymarket contracts have either been too expensive or pricing in a jump on day of listing. 4. However, the realized volatility on Hyperliquid's contract should be suppressed by the way they charge funding. It's risky to short Hyperliquid's pre-launch contract because of the mark price used for liquidation. (See: XPL.) Because of this, it plausibly trades at a slight premium. This would mean the Polymarket contracts are pricing even higher odds relative to Hyperliquid. 5. Even so, the odds of listing above 6B have been steadily decreasing.
yenwod tweet mediayenwod tweet mediayenwod tweet media
English
14
26
310
67.3K
cephalopodshop
cephalopodshop@macrocephalopod·
If anyone wondered why I’ve been posting less actively for the last year or so — it’s because I think I’ve said nearly everything that I can say on the topic of quant finance. I started posting ~5 years ago because I thought there was a big gap between what I was reading on twitter, and what is common knowledge among experienced quants in industry. I think my posts narrowed that gap somewhat, as well as others like @__paleologo, @0xfdf and @systematicls. I don’t have anything to sell, and if I continued posting about quant topics I would either be repeating myself or revealing proprietary information. I have no wish to do either. So consider this a soft goodbye — I’ll still be reading and I’ll still reply, but I probably won’t post anything new on the topic of trading. If I ever write about it again it will probably be long form as that seems more appealing than farming likes on twitter.
Gappy (Giuseppe Paleologo)@__paleologo

I don't believe I have posted anything *remotely* practical in one year. I think @macrocephalopod has slowed down too. @moreproteinbars and @QuiteMidlife outdo each other posting food pics with occasional war stories; @bennpeifert also really got tired and busy. As for @Gingfacekillah, his books are where it's at. @0xfdf went silent. @KrisAbdelmessih at least has a good substack. And then "traders" (on those lists!) on X are perhaps *too* practical. As for actual professional traders and PMs, all lurkers: not one of the those I personally know posts. Maybe we're all worried about the coming of the Antichrist, but it sure feels like X is in the shallows. Things evolve. Personally, having both time and permission, I'd rather write a substack.

English
46
13
765
116.9K
class
class@classpath·
@stalequant How does credora calculate p(default)? If its a function of APY then that would explain the good r^2 but not necessarily mean its correctly priced.
English
0
0
0
31
Martin Gale (λ,π)
Martin Gale (λ,π)@itsmartingale·
Suppose you stop adding new features to your mode model and just run it live with no manual intervention: - how long before your sharpe halves? - how long before your sharpe goes to zero? Or equivalent: - how quickly does your model need to evolve to maintain the same sharpe?
English
2
0
1
701
Martin Gale (λ,π)
Martin Gale (λ,π)@itsmartingale·
A short thread with lots of questions on “research decay”, something that has occupied my mind a lot in the recent period.
English
1
0
7
948