Ditto

Of all involved parties I actually think LZ is being treated the most unfairly. Yes they could have added additional safeguards but it's not like they had negligent security, they had very good security and were the target of a state sponsored and highly sophisticated attack. All KelpDAO had to do on the other hand was read the LayerZero docs before using it to secure their multi billion dollar protocol. All Aave had to do was look at KelpDAO's LayerZero config. Not saying all three aren't to blame (they all deserve a share) but that's how I see it.

who is building the inverse ethena

Lmao — literally the worst statement that could have come out. - If the entire point of a DVN is customizable / modular security, why does a "1-of-1" configuration even exist in the first place? If the system allows this option, it’s not the fault of the customer who chose it—it’s a fundamental design flaw by the system that permitted it. - At the end of the day, the fact remains that the DVN RPC was compromised. DVN is a LayerZero product, and they are the ones who sold it to these teams.

Most crypto projects spend $100K+ trying to crack Korea Market I built a Korea GTM Intelligence platform that gives you better output — for $0 🔵 Blue Pill : Everything you were paying $100K for — but free 🔴 Red Pill : The true playbook nobody shared Here's what's inside 👇