Hillbilly Base🇺🇲

@edgemaster30001 @girlsbian_ You cant change your sex

@hillbillybase @girlsbian_ In that case, how many of these characteristics does one have to change to 'change sex' according to you?

THERE ARE BOOBS GROWING OUT OF ME

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 Let me put this out there, if Trump invited a bunch of activists that were controversial to an event on the white house lawn, and they acted in a depraved manner, like usual. Id condemn it, i am not condemning any president having a birthday party.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 What else do you call something someone should have seen coming, but did not? An oversight. Holy shit man. You legitimately have no reading comprehension. You do not understand the argument I am trying to make, or do not want to.

That was a fucking confederate statue Just say you hate black people gng ✌️🥀

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 You wrote the rules, you admitted he was guilty, 5 mins of research would of told you it was a bad idea, I hope secret service does more than that. Those people where chosen by the Biden administration. It was foreseeable.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 No matter what Trump does, you’ll condemn it. Your rule: “should’ve seen it coming.” You said “Yes” for Biden. Now it’s “oversight.” For Trump it’s “explicit backing.” That’s TDS.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 man.*

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 You said “Yes” to your rule for Biden, then broke it with “oversight.” That’s the pass. You won’t say it, so I will.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 look at the order of the comments ma

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 You said “Yes” when I asked if “should’ve seen it coming” applies to Biden. Now you say “I used express support before I said yes.” You’re changing the rule after the fact. “Should’ve seen it coming” + “oversight” = Biden gets a pass. Admit it.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 I used express support for the event as a standard before I ever said yes. Both things can be true, btw: Biden should have seen it coming, and his oversight isn't the same as express support.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 You said “should’ve seen it coming.” I asked if Biden qualifies. You said “Yes.” Now it’s “not having foresight” for Biden vs “explicit backing” for Trump. You set the rule. Said “Yes.” Then broke it. Just admit Biden gets a pass.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Not having the foresight to know that an activist is going to bsre their chest is not comparable to the explicit backing of a UFC and motorbike show.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 Your rule: "should've seen it coming." I asked if Biden qualifies. You said "Yes." Now it's "oversight" and "not dillogent" for Biden, "express backing" for Trump. You changed "Yes" to "oversight." That's teams, not events.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Do you not legitimately understand the difference between something which happens as the result of someone not being dillogent vs. something that happens with the express backing of a president? The girl flashing her tits was a byproduct of an oversight, not explicitly backed.

@facesitter0_o @CandGoods4u Please don't push your sexual fantasies on me.

@CandGoods4u @hillbillybase You've only had ur nose in ur moms vaj

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 "An oversight" for Biden. "Hypocritical" for Trump. You said "Yes" same rule applies. That's two rules. That's TDS.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 an oversight*

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 No your lying to protect biden, you already admitted she did.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Actually, now that you mention it, you pulled the claim that she's known for nudes totally out of your ass. What the fuck is your problem?

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 She posted nudes publicly, as you said the bare amount of research, a simple google search would show that. By your rules Biden should be held responsible for what happened. But here you are still defending him. Different rules, TDS

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 I guess? I can't find much if anything, I was assuming you operated truthfully. Can you name anything she's done?

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 So why have you been defending Biden for the event he did on the Whitehouse lawn, and condemning Trump for his?

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Yes

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 So you admit she post nudes publicly?

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 but also, if you do even a bare amoint of research, you'll see she's not primarily known for her nudes.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 No we are establishing whether different presidents have to operate under different rules for you.

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 so let's get this straight- we're comparing a trans woman flashing her chest who was then banned by the White House to a President explicitly condoning a UFC and motorbike event (after complaining about America and the White House being disgraced)

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 Yes, she was known for public nudes, shouldn't the biden administration researched her before inviting her to the event, you said Trump should of, doesn't Biden fall under your rules the same?

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Rose Montoya?

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 It might not be every parade but it happens at alot of them, plus what about the woman that post nudes publicly?

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Pride doesn't have routine public nudity, man. I went to a Pride event yesterday in Indianapolis, and most everyone was dressed appropriately. This is why I asked if you were trying to equate Pride to your hypothetical.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 Your words: “Trump should’ve seen it coming or done more research” if group routinely strips. Facts: Pride = routine public nudity. Montoya = routine public nudes. Biden invited her. Apply your rule to Biden. What’s the verdict?

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 Then I'd probably say Trump should've seen it coming or done more research.

@dontcomprehendi @ELONSUCKS3532 Its not loaded, its your answer, just answer the question please

@hillbillybase @ELONSUCKS3532 The answer matters, because I'm not going to answer a loaded question or a question with false presumptions.