tsunami_crypto

2.1K posts

tsunami_crypto banner
tsunami_crypto

tsunami_crypto

@ls_brd

An expert in market analysis, always on the lookout for opportunities, and a cryptocurrency trader since 2018. It started generating profits in 2023 😅

Texas 加入时间 Aralık 2021
10 关注21.5K 粉丝
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@GaryMarcus investments depend on no one exploiting the gap between hype and real deployment that gap is real and its huge
English
0
0
0
19
Kirk Borne
Kirk Borne@KirkDBorne·
Book by @adamjkucharski explains how certainty, even in math, can be an illusion. "Proof: The Art and Science of Certainty" at amzn.to/4m7gm8l #Mathematics "To discover proof [of something], we must reach into a thicket of errors and biases and embrace uncertainty"
Kirk Borne tweet media
English
2
0
4
332
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
The headline number from Gabor's Claude Code session is wrong, and the right one is more interesting. Everyone reporting on the episode says he shipped a working iOS app to TestFlight on 10% of a $200 plan. True, but that frames Claude Code as cheap. It is not cheap. It is a labor arbitrage so steep the numbers stop making sense. Run the math the way a CFO would. Twenty dollars produced 51 Jira tickets organized into sprints with explicit dependencies, a full Confluence spec, a Figma design system, wired prototype arrows across screens, a Flutter front-end, a Firebase back-end with secret management, and a Vertex vector DB indexing two reference books. Forty cents per ticket if you only count Jira. Two cents per artifact if you count everything. Now run the same scope through a London agency. Spec phase alone is 40 hours at 150 dollars an hour. Six thousand dollars before anyone touches Figma. Design system another 80 hours. Front-end another 200. Back-end another 150. RAG pipeline with vector embeddings is its own line item. The bid lands somewhere between 80 and 120 thousand dollars and takes 12 weeks. Gabor did it for 20 dollars in one session. The four-thousand-X cost compression is not the story. The 12-weeks-to-one-session compression is. You can absorb a price cut. You cannot absorb a calendar cut. The PMs whose moat was sequencing dependencies and managing ticket flow across sprints are watching that moat get drained in real time. The 21-agent setup is what the drain looks like. The right framing is not "AI is cheap." It is: the unit economics of a software project just collapsed by three orders of magnitude on cost and one order of magnitude on time. PMs who think their job description is the destination are pricing themselves against the old curve.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

This guy literally broke down everything to build a 21 agent dev team in Claude Code: 0:00 - Why one prompt = AI slop 1:55 - Claude Code as your full startup 2:43 - The 21-agent team 4:57 - Inside the system analyst agent 5:52 - Live demo: 0 → TestFlight 8:42 - Define a "good" system analyst first 11:53 - The system analyst workflow 12:17 - Why Confluence + Jira + MCPs matter 15:30 - Classic PM skills > vibe coding 19:15 - The scaffolding that kills spaghetti code 22:10 - Setting up agents inside Claude Code 26:19 - The longest dictation prompt this podcast has seen 35:29 - Why dictation beats typing for AI specs 47:30 - Brand guidelines in Figma Make 55:59 - Idea → prompt → design → app 1:06:27 - Claude Code builds the Figma screens 1:23:59 - Frontend tickets appear in Jira (with Figma links) 1:48:49 - The hockey rules AI app goes live 1:53:56 - Full recap: Claude, Confluence, Figma, Jira, Simulator, TestFlight 2:03:17 - Should PMs get AI PM certificates? 2:08:15 - How to build a PM portfolio that lands FAANG offers 2:13:25 - How to get started this week

English
2
1
1
1.6K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@GaryMarcus @scaling01 media comprehension goes out the window the second "AI" appears in a headline 80% code merged vs 80% inventions worlds apart
English
0
0
1
28
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@DataChaz lucky he figured it out before usb c made everything somehow worse
English
0
0
1
37
Charly Wargnier
Charly Wargnier@DataChaz·
a man attempting to transfer files from his Commodore 64 to his Apple computer, 1984
Charly Wargnier tweet media
English
6
5
28
906
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@emollick this makes me realize how many bad ui texts ive just accepted over the years a toggle doesnt need a cringey name
English
0
0
0
117
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
One reason you want AIs to be better writers is that there is a lot of writing even in software, and it is incredibly painful to hit a menu which is filled with Claudisms or ChatGPTish phrases. A report is not "what leaves the room" & analyses are not "every number makes a mark"
English
23
5
135
8.4K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@aakashgupta classic O'Leary move gesture shrink the land but leave the power untouched cutting acreage means nothing when u keep the 9 gigawatts
English
0
0
0
86
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Kevin O'Leary "gave up" 20,000 acres he was never going to use. A physicist ran the numbers: his data center needs about 7,000 acres to actually run. The plan was 40,000. So cutting it in half costs him close to nothing. What he didn't cut: the power. 9 gigawatts, roughly 20 times a normal data center, in a desert where the Great Salt Lake is already drying up. Same as last week. That's the whole move. Give back the land everyone can see, keep the power nobody's talking about. The land was never the problem. The energy always was. "I have no choice" is a strange thing to say after conceding the one number that didn't matter.
Interesting AF@interesting_aIl

Kevin O’Leary will shrink his 40,000-acre Utah data center by half after facing backlash “I have no choice”

English
6
13
59
5.4K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@petergyang the ultimate mobile dev setup codex while hiding from parent duties, peak 2026
English
0
0
0
57
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
Weekends are for driving kids to activities and then hiding in a corner to dictate to codex on the phone 🙈
English
22
1
41
4K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@fchollet isnt adaptability just a side effect of knowing which parts dont scale
English
0
0
0
80
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
Scaling knowledge gives you static competence. Intelligence gives you adaptability.
English
40
18
207
11.6K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@aakashgupta the phone impulse is such a reflex now i barely notice doing it wonder what breaks it first
English
0
0
0
18
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Reaching for the phone the second you feel discomfort is one of the most efficient ways to train a nervous system to panic. Discomfort is a small spike in autonomic arousal. A slightly-off internal signal that something might be wrong. Left alone, that signal rises, peaks, and resolves on its own in about ninety seconds. The phone cuts the arc short. You escape the sensation before it can resolve, so your brain never watches it pass safely. So it draws the only conclusion available: the arousal was real, the escape made it stop, the escape was necessary. The threshold drops. A smaller signal now trips the same alarm. Run that loop a few hundred times a day and the brain starts filing ordinary bodily noise under threat. That's the actual engine of a lot of modern anxiety: a prediction system trained on your own avoidance, getting faster every week. The brain learns what's dangerous by watching what you flee. Flee a racing heart enough times and "racing heart" gets logged as an emergency, permanently. The fix lives in the same mechanism that broke it. Let one wave crest without touching the phone. Ninety seconds, hands still, attention on the sensation. You're handing your brain the one input it never gets: the feeling rose, peaked, and faded, and nothing happened. Do that on purpose a few times a day and the prediction updates. The body stops reading as an alarm and goes back to being a body.
Lorwen Harris Nagle, PhD@LORWEN108

A Stanford psychiatrist says modern anxiety is not caused by danger. It's caused by tiny habits that teach your brain to panic when nothing is actually wrong. You do them every day. And you call them normal. 6 normal habits quietly teaching your nervous system to panic:▼▼▼ 1/ Reaching for your phone the moment you feel uncomfortable.

English
1
4
10
3.2K
Miles Brundage
Miles Brundage@Miles_Brundage·
Have something funny I want to tweet but I can't upload the video files due to slow WiFI 😡 *man yelling in clouds*
English
3
0
5
862
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@GaryMarcus so basically 99.9% of growth is one sector. heard this story before, always ends the same way.
English
0
0
0
63
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
Is this about the World Cup or the D-Day anniversary?
Bojan Tunguz tweet media
English
3
0
18
1.8K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@jerryjliu0 the open-weight models get good enough for 90% of use cases long before they hit the actual frontier pricing gulf is where the real fight is now
English
1
0
0
29
Jerry Liu
Jerry Liu@jerryjliu0·
No frontier lab will own every single point on the pareto frontier around cost/latency and accuracy. Even as the pareto frontier itself advances, there will always be points owned by open-weight models that are orders of magnitude cheaper than the frontier ones. There's been this huge uptick in interest in model routing and cost optimization, for two reasons: ✅ Organizations are more carefully thinking about how to carefully manage cost ✅ Every AI-native startup and VC is thinking about the best way to build a moat against the frontier labs (and raise their gross margins) These topics are quite relevant for our mission at @llama_index - which is to build the document infrastructure for AI agents. We want to help unlock the trillions of pages of unstructured paperwork within every organization for agentic automation. Organizations require both higher accuracy and orders of magnitude lower cost within their document OCR solutions compared to the frontier models. The pareto frontier of document OCR has a meaningful, exploitable gap beyond what is offered by the frontier VLMs. Exploiting this gap requires both AI expertise and an absolutely obsessive focus around how PDFs, .docx, .pptx, and other file formats work.
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

Your margin is my opportunity: AI version… The biggest surprise of 2026 is that the capability gap between the best open-weight/source models and the best closed models has narrowed much faster than the pricing gap. The pricing gap remains enormous while the capability gap is quite narrow. What does this means in practice? For a company consuming 1 billion input tokens and 1 billion output tokens per month: GPT-5.5 Pro: ~$105,000 Claude Opus 4.8: ~$30,000 DeepSeek V4 Pro: ~$5,220 DeepSeek R1: ~$2,740 I asked ChatGPT what it thought about this and it answered as follows: “If I were building a company today, the economic frontier would look roughly like: DeepSeek V4 Pro / R1 for high-volume inference. Claude Opus for premium agent workflows where reliability matters. GPT-5.5 Pro only for workloads where its incremental capability demonstrably produces enough business value to justify a 20–40× token premium.” Most CEOs have no idea that, instead of this nuanced approach, their teams are running amok internally by picking the most expensive models in most cases and burning through massive budgets with zero governance, audit ability and control. As control planes like our Software Factory become more standard, you can expect the run rate revenue growth of the frontier labs to go down meaningfully and the revenues of the open models to skyrocket. Why? Because we can implement the nuanced approach above and be agnostic to model - instead focusing on customer intent, model task and cost management among other things.

English
10
1
18
3.3K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@Suhail max levchin as wingman for crashing a VC event is not a bad story at all
English
0
0
2
854
Suhail
Suhail@Suhail·
All my bad VC stories mostly just make me sound like a wuss so I'll just share a good one: One time I crashed an Allen&Co event since it meant I could pitch 4 investors in one day in the same location. I didn't want a week gap in my fundraise so Max Levchin encouraged me to crash the event in Scottsdale after I joked about doing so. I flew to AZ and drove w my dad in the car to the Ritz. Anyway, everyone I pitched was very lukewarm until I get to Ben and Marc at a16z. I pitch them both at a coffee table. Neither seemed all that interested in my deck so I presumed they're also checked out on my company. Ready to close the laptop and return home, Marc stands up and says: "If anyone gives you an exploding termsheet, tell them to go fuck themselves." At this point, I hadn't even heard of what that was so I had no idea if this was a good or bad reaction. It was Friday. I went to the partner meeting on Monday. Termsheet that week. We had no other termsheet options. The rest is history. I really appreciate the conviction they had on two young nobodies.
English
10
3
170
20.6K
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@IAmPascio next step: the tweet itself will be too long to read and we'll just react to the AI summary of the AI summary
English
1
0
0
15
Pascio
Pascio@IAmPascio·
A few years ago, "too long to read" was a fifty-page contract. Then it became a ten-page proposal. Then a five-page brief. Now we've reached a single page of densely considered thinking and even that is too much to not feed into AI. We're in the "summaries of summaries" era.
English
4
0
4
298
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@bengoertzel thats cool, does the golden record include any original music from u guys or is it more of a compilation thing
English
0
0
0
26
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@natanielruizg when the punchline is just "some people will always be poor" it stops being satire fast?
English
0
0
0
18
Nataniel Ruiz
Nataniel Ruiz@natanielruizg·
few memes are more distasteful than the “permanent underclass” one
English
4
0
8
227
tsunami_crypto
tsunami_crypto@ls_brd·
@MatthewBerman everyone says that until something breaks and theres no one to blame but ur own install skill issue tax adds up
English
0
0
2
147
Matthew Berman
Matthew Berman@MatthewBerman·
open source lookin more attractive every day
English
46
10
196
10.3K
Mark Tenenholtz
Mark Tenenholtz@marktenenholtz·
The easiest way to find out if someone knows what they're talking about is to ask them about their opinion on the Google/SpaceX deal
English
18
1
27
8.3K