Xenon

76.4K posts

Xenon banner
Xenon

Xenon

@vertinski

OC • cognitive engineer 🧩 • Vertinski Robotics 🤖

加入时间 Mayıs 2011
6.4K 关注1.6K 粉丝
置顶推文
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
can you read this?
Xenon tweet media
English
8
10
103
0
Useful Idiot
Useful Idiot@usefulidiott·
@Teaweave @ArmedJ0y It’s not a real fucking story how can almost NOBODY keep their Bullshit Detector ™ charged anymore
English
8
0
63
8.6K
troy james weaver
troy james weaver@Teaweave·
Reddit huffing community is where one finds beauty in this life
troy james weaver tweet media
English
91
1.6K
24.6K
1.3M
Funes
Funes@Bulkington___·
@ErinPerise Depression is 100 to 110 IQ trait
English
15
2
96
6.4K
Xenon 已转推
Erin Perise
Erin Perise@ErinPerise·
Midwits are always so serious about everything High IQ people are silly and whimsical
English
121
243
3.2K
129.4K
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
@GENIC0N they should also vote and conceal carry
English
0
0
0
26
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
germanium based hardware ReLU activation 👀
Llorens MRC@Llorens_MRC

@tubechip404 I found rectification in pyrite, but a little, and only at a few points. With zincite it was easier, but the shape was unusual. Polarized silicon carbide also worked. With metallic germanium it was automatic, very easy; I even built a contact diode that still works years later.

English
0
1
3
97
Curiosity
Curiosity@CuriosityonX·
🚨: You are looking at the brightest star in the night sky, 'Sirius' seen through a telescope. It is 56 trillion miles away from us.
English
254
1.8K
18.9K
537.5K
Xenon 已转推
Mathematica
Mathematica@mathemetica·
This is the legendary Lorenz attractor; the butterfly of chaos theory in glorious 3D! Equations that birthed the butterfly effect: dx/dt = 10(y−x) dy/dt = x(28−z)−y dz/dt = xy−(8/3)z Tell me your craziest real-life “butterfly effect” moment?
English
12
111
516
26.7K
Xenon 已转推
Yoshinabbis (侍)
Yoshinabbis (侍)@yoshinabbis·
how it feels to smoke a blunt in Japan.
English
169
950
6.4K
199.7K
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
@cosmosarcive also could be other phenomena: 1) charge (small scale) 2) magnetism (mid scale, orthogonal) 3) gravity (large scale)
English
0
0
0
79
Cosmos Archive
Cosmos Archive@cosmosarcive·
A regular lightbulb isn’t “incoherent”; it just depends on how fast you look. At, 10⁻¹⁶ s → you see clean EM waves 10⁻¹⁴ s → perfect interference patterns 10⁻⁶ s → classic messy bulb light Coherence isn’t a property of source; it’s timescale.
English
43
321
2.4K
140.5K
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
@jaimeojedas @anirbanbandyo says a lot about double slit and other experiments also quantum computation possible at home 👌
English
0
0
0
13
Jaime
Jaime@jaimeojedas·
That’s a clear way to frame the role of timescale. If coherence depends on timescale, it raises the question of whether those regimes are dynamically sustainable, not just observable. The same structure may appear coherent or not depending on whether the system can keep pace with the relevant timescales.
English
1
0
1
86
Xenon 已转推
Mathematica
Mathematica@mathemetica·
Watch hydrogen atom wavefunctions smoothly transition between quantum states (n,l,m) This is the actual probability density of finding the electron; not just static orbitals, but the real quantum dance as it morphs between energy levels.
English
20
258
1.5K
63.6K
Xenon 已转推
JMa
JMa@JJMaTrader·
If you're an autist you spot patterns, and it's very easy to spot sociopaths. As economic conditions get more difficult, we tend to breed more sociopaths/psychopaths. In our evolutionary past, these traits helped us survive some really horrible circumstances, predation, etc. However, it ain't fun to be on the receiving end because the current batch of midwits socios watched Game of Thrones and thought it would be fun to start f*cking over everyone they could get their hands on for sport, or because they missed a cue and assume you're out to fuck them over. It's actually troubling because this pattern suggests that as things have gotten much harder, the younger ones will be the most viscous. Make enough money that you don't have to deal with any of them, socially or most especially in a "work environment" where you can't really just bounce without the financial means.
English
4
7
45
3.3K
Xenon 已转推
Tenobrus
Tenobrus@tenobrus·
at google this was known as "buying the gnome". there's like a billion tweets about this already but basically the story goes back in like 2005 or something they were building out their shopping search system, and it was working pretty well. except for the fact that if you searched for sneakers, the top result was a garden gnome. engineers were going crazy trying to fix the ranking bug, but eventually someone noticed that the gnome listing was on ebay, and there was only one of them, and it cost like $50. so they just bought the gnome and suddenly the listing was gone, problem solved. why bother fixing software issues when you can just change the world to fit your software instead?
Tenobrus@tenobrus

if you're about to release a model that you know has the ability to reveal zerodays in every commonly used open source project you could delay release for a few years or spend another ten billion on alignment RL. or you could just secretly fix all the zerodays yourself first.

English
28
238
6.1K
355.7K
Xenon
Xenon@vertinski·
@austinc3301 @bouguereau_stan @niko_kukushkin “probabilities” is just a math tool. this still doesn’t explain anything. also, the probabilities are there because the thing *is* moving really fast + in additional dimension (that’s the complex part)
English
1
0
0
68
Agus 🔸
Agus 🔸@austinc3301·
Short answer: because time evolution has to preserve probabilities, and the only way to evolve something without changing its magnitude is to rotate it in the complex plane. Energy is just the rate of that rotation (E = ℏω). The i in the Schrödinger equation is what makes it a rotation instead of a growth/decay.
English
4
0
26
737