𐐶𐐨𐑊𐐼𐑉𐐴𐐻

@BreatheLesss if I was a high IQ anti-social person with social acumen (who just implied you're dumb because you use words incorrectly) would that prove or disprove your post?

@wieldwright Wait, are you larping a dumb guy to prove my post right??? Genius.

My personal experience with very high IQ individuals was that they lacked social acumen and charisma compared to my less intelligent friends. This observation contradicted the consensus that IQ is correlated with positive, pro social character traits. But then everything made sense when I observed them in their preferred environment, interacting with people on their level. I made the mistake of comparing their normal with my normal lol.

@BreatheLesss you literally didn't, unless you believe the definition of words are stratified by IQ, in which case just ignore my comment

@wieldwright I literally said that my expectations were wrong.

@usutav MQ-9s (which routinely fly over american cities) could surveil an entire city 15 years ago, but I'm sure the technology hasn't advanced since then

There isn't enough satellite coverage in the world to do this to you, a student or retail worker who posts edgy things online. These proofs of concept do a le viral every month for speaking to lots of people's suggestibility towards delusions of exaggerated self-importance.

@extradeadjcb but then they won't get to call it the troonority report

surely Tennessee already has a sex offender registry

@Sheum_Search all I see is bonzo from ender's game

"Noooo we need more trashy mormon representation, for like, missionary work and stuff. Not for my own personal indulgence so I can rationalize my own trashy behaviors because I'm not a typcical cookie cutter member (i have a tattoo)"

@PinkneyAtLarge oh do you care about state rights now

ICE OUT OF SLC!

@CiaoboyTX @punished_bobda @Hashboz they get really mad when you tell them it's not a free market, and that their success is more determined by their social/economic proximity to the parasite class created by the cantillon effect

@punished_bobda @Hashboz The old man demands his economic blood tithe for his one true God, the free market!

How about we have YOU move to the middle of nowhere to make room for the young who actually have futures

@ThomBrady5 @joekent16jan19 maybe there just wasn't any alcohol to be found in a redundant intel organization with (apparently) little influence

After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.

@4doorImperial @joekent16jan19 neither is blind loyalty, especially when the loyalty appears to only go in one direction

@0x68488192 @joekent16jan19 Betrayal is not “doing the right thing”

@4doorImperial @joekent16jan19 a foreign concept to many, but some people prioritize doing the right thing over "national prominence"

@joekent16jan19 Trump made you. His endorsement raised you to national prominence. When you failed to win your elections, he gave you a position in his administration. You reward his kindness with backstabbing and denouncement. You are a traitor and an embarrassment. Enjoy the rumblesphere!

@JensenVero64278 @sigilante about to have a ~6th great grandson of someone from Fårevejle

@sigilante There is almost no Danish dna anywhere in USA

There is more Danish blood in Utah than in Denmark. Greenland is Deseret by ancient right.

@Cratetyrion @palis It's opaque algorithms vs self determination, I know what side I'm on

@palis don't doubt this is good advice so long as you view dating as something in need of "strategies"

One of the best strategies on dating apps is spawn camping This is where you swipe through the entire dating market in a distance + age range. It can take a week or so of 30min per day, but narrow the distance setting (and age range) so it’s easier. Then when you swipe daily you mainly hit new members. When you want to expand past spawn camping, just expand the distance/age ranges again This is incredibly effective for men because a significant percent of women have low retention rates (*green flag*) and do not spend a long time on these apps. These women either get swooped up quickly because some high elo guy established a connection (usually she’ll get burned, sometimes she’ll get lucky and find a man), or these girls become quickly overwhelmed by the number of likes, matches and draining nature of low quality pickup messages from burned out men, and leave the app Women who are on dating apps long term is often a huge red flag in a variety of ways. Not all of them, but if they’re attractive it means they’re usually either serial daters or aren’t getting into relationships for a very good reason and you don’t want to waste your time finding out why Spawn camping like this can also sometimes allow you to bat way out of your league, if you establish a connection and contact outside the app, and she stops opening it before encountering the 10/10 players who will ruin everything for you once she’s matched a handful of them I’d say this is in my top-3 most important and effective strategies when using dating apps

@gardenboyduck @sister_slay what if a species gets separated into two groups, then undergoes enough intra-group evolution to the point where no member of group 1 can reproduce with group 2

@0x68488192 @sister_slay Absolutely. That isn’t Darwinian evolution though

Do you believe in evolution?

@gardenboyduck @sister_slay do you believe in intra-species evolution?

@sister_slay There has never been a case of a change of species. Species evolution cannot be proven

@AlfredYoun62486 I wonder why he's unaware of something that anyone in the military could explain

the video is worse than the text, they are truly retarded

@shalkie @BunTharun @Diatribe333 @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb "we don't know anything for sure but for any given estimate I will only question the mathematical rigor of the larger one, while offering no estimate of my own" disingenuous worm

@BunTharun @Diatribe333 @0x68488192 @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb it also depends on what is considered an abortion. Is a medicinally induced abortion with something like the "Plan B" pill an abortion? So if a woman is raped and goes in to PP the next day to take the pill does that count? These are the questions we don't have answers for

"We killed our baby" is a pretty crazy campaign slogan but Nate's district is even crazier

@shalkie @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb and you continue to ignore the 4% because you know it's a misleading statistic, because you want to twist things to support your beliefs regardless of the actual evidence

@0x68488192 @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb I already articulated why that 12% isn't an accurate number.

@shalkie @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb i asked you to tell me why 4% is more accurate than 12%, not make up reasoning that's obviously worse. you're criticizing 12% and not 4%, so it has to be better, and you can articulate why, right?

@0x68488192 @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb Just over 50% of locations provide abortions so lets say that she has 55% chance of getting an abortion. Based on your logic my 55% would be the best predictive power... See how stupid that is?

@SouthsideTilly @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb no u

@0x68488192 @csmaddox2008 @extradeadjcb Or you can just shut the fuck up.