Post
@AzuriSplashes can you be more specific about the visual differences that result from the lack of intention?
x.com/SHL0MS/status/…
𒐪@SHL0MS
please focus on the specific visual elements that distinguish the AI image from a real Monet painting like the below
English
@SHL0MS Sure. It feels less lively. It lacks the texture, the rugged edges, the folds, the crevices and creases and bevels and topology of plastic arts. The fine, calculated highlights. The AI version is granulated pixelation, and it looks that way, it lacks the mess of humanity.
English
English
@CaptainDadpants @404cench @SHL0MS Everyone already knows that already!
But, notice that my main point is a generalized point about Ai imagery to drawn imagery as entirely different categories.
English
@AzuriSplashes @404cench @SHL0MS it could be interpreted as a generalized point if you weren't specifically expounding on the Monet image specifically x.com/AzuriSplashes/…
Azuri@AzuriSplashes
@SHL0MS Sure. It feels less lively. It lacks the texture, the rugged edges, the folds, the crevices and creases and bevels and topology of plastic arts. The fine, calculated highlights. The AI version is granulated pixelation, and it looks that way, it lacks the mess of humanity.
English
@CaptainDadpants @404cench @SHL0MS And that is after SHL0MS pushback. I am fine admitting that it forced me to search for issues, admit my Monety ignorance (and distaste for that painting it seems), and subsequently standing by what I said as the starting point.
English
@AzuriSplashes @404cench @SHL0MS There was no pushback. He asked you to clarify your points with examples
English
@CaptainDadpants @404cench @SHL0MS I don't mean pushback in an agressive sense. I precisely mean the latter.
Have you opened photoshop yourself and overlaid SHL0MS edited version over the original? If you do, you will see what I pointed out. Up to you.
English