Post

Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑
Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑@Cryptolution·
🚨JUST IN: Michael @Saylor warns that BIP 110 would set a precedent by turning a spam dispute into a consensus change. The debate extends beyond Ordinals and #Runes, it's about how Bitcoin treats valid, fee-paying transactions.
Michael Saylor@saylor

There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions. That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter. $BTC

English
13
70
218
7.1K
Mike
Mike@MCBirminghamBTC·
@Cryptolution @saylor you understand when inscriptions are made they duling bad because they consume satoshi's AND they put non bitcoin into the blockchain.
English
0
0
0
8
Redheart
Redheart@Redhear77823034·
@Cryptolution @saylor Just go spam ETH or SOL with your Ordinals and #Runes and they will happily accept your "fees". The Bitcoin Block chain doesn't need them and doesn't want them because they don't make Bitcoin better MONEY. QUIT TRYING TO LEECH OFF BITCOIN!
English
1
0
4
100
CNR
CNR@drsncnr03·
@Cryptolution @saylor Ordinals supporters fiercely attacked Runes, viewing them as rivals. Runes, in turn, proved to be nothing but piles of junk that caused financial losses for many people. I hope they all just disappear.
English
1
0
1
52
Luke
Luke@lukej_sgf·
@Cryptolution @saylor File storage is not a legitimate use case no matter what fees someone pays.
English
0
0
2
45
Paylaş