@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Because you were assuming God is not biological. Therefore anything biological is NOT God. I dont know where your confusion is.

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Ok so let's apply your logic. God is not time therefore God cannot act in time.

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Thats not even a coherent example. Time is not a person like having a biological body is a person

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Because your response was incoherent. Not biological by nature does not logically entail incapable of assuming biological nature. Answer my questions

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera x.com/i/status/20188… Then why did you have a problem here?

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera You're not "tracking" God is not biological he is metaphysical = What God is Track here however God can ASSUME a biological form = What God can do Last time answer my questions and stop dodging.

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera All you are saying is God can take a form of creation. This proves the very point I initially made. You God has different modes/forms

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera So your point is God taking action.....thats revelationary. Since you're not answering my questions then I believe we are done, as you don't have an argument, only statements.

I tracked the conversation and your position switched between modalism and partitioning Both are heresies I have a question If Jesus was God; why did Peter call him the servant of God? And why did he always directed his worship to the Father; whom he called the only true God?

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera John contradiction himself then? John 1:1 The Word was God. John 1:18 the only-begotten God John 8:58 Before Abraham was, I AM. John 20:28 Thomas calls Jesus My Lord and my God. You assume functional distinction = ontological inequality.

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Maybe you will understand if you know who wrote John Whom do you think wrote the gospel of John?

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Or maybe cherry picking isn't going to help your cause? Given what Peter stated is not out of line from Paul statement and the rest of John statements. So how about you focus on that? Out the mouth of 2 or more witness is the standard.

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera We can stay with Peter if you don’t want to tell me that John is an anonymously written gospel by a community that has nothing to do with Apostle John Now; for Peter; whom was Jesus a servant of? While he was God?

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Or you can acknowledge your argument is rediculious given you need to prove verbatim that oral teachings from the apostles is invalid and papyrus was cheap and actually common use like the pen and paper today. Or how about with zero evidence we must just believe Muhammad

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera What? I honestly don’t know what are you trying to say I’m just asking how can god be the servant of God if there is one god

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Start with internal distinctions

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera You are all over the place Chris

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Relation distinction. Trinity remember. Keep up.

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera You are all over the place in how the relationship work and how you described them.

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera You're having issues distinguishing between modalism and trinity. Nevertheless the core belief is the same, which is irrelevant since this isn't Christianity vs Christianity but Islam vs Christianity. AND I believe we are done since you've failed to answer my questions.

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Clam down Chris All your questions are answered yet you are confused about the trinity

@Randomlyscript @ChrisTrade4 @9ushaman @deusimpera I would be too if trying to make it sound coherent when it is not without falling in heresies

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Answer my question, before you go on about heresy. Or is this a one way street where you dictate to me I must answer you questions? Why cant you answer this 1. Can God cease to be God? 2. Does God have sovereign free will?

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera What does this line of questioning have to do with 3 person and 1 God who are co-equal and co-eternal? You are way of topic

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Everything. Answer the questions. Does God have sovereign free will? Can God cease to be God?

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Yes and yes Please tell me how does this prove the coherencey of the trinity being 1 God?

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera And final part 6 These admissions prove that the Son acting as in the Incarnation is fully compatible with being God, making your claims about separate consciousnesses or modalism logically impossible.

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Where did you get this concept of "incarnation"? Jesus said he is God incarnate or something?

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera What is the definition of incarnation then?

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera Its the pagan beliefs of God manifesting like creation i.e like a demi god or lesser god

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera You stated Yes God has free sovereign will Now your contradicting yourself. God has the sovereignty free will to self limit in a mode of operation. Was God being a semi God when he restrained himself from wiping out the Israelites when they worshipped the Golden Calf?

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera "self limit in a mode of operation" What kinds of nonsensical sophistry is this?!?!

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera What God does in action.

@ChrisTrade4 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera But God does not change. If God says he is not a man, then you cant point to a man and call him God

@Fitrah46782412 @Randomlyscript @9ushaman @deusimpera So show me where divinity was changed. John 1:14 The Word became flesh. Action added, essence unchanged. Where's the change in divinity? Hebrews 13:8 “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” Malachi 3:6 “For I the Lord do not change.”

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera The word become flesh is in John. Do you know who wrote John? When was it written? Why NT scholars all agree it’s not a historical Gospel?

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Part 3 Please provide contemporaneous external evidence that Muhammad met Gabriel beyond Muhammad’s own testimony. Thank you.

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Part 2 Provide historical documentation showing a specific corruption event in Johannine oral transmission. Why the Oral transmissions can not be trusted, who altered it, when, and how it replaced the earlier tradition.

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Part 1 Well that's simply inaccurate The following would disagree with you Richard Bauckham Craig Blomberg D.A. Carson Craig Keener Andreas Köstenberger N.T. Wright