Chris Trade
4.6K posts

Chris Trade
@ChrisTrade4
Navigating a F'ed up world of financial manipulation and economic drunkenness. Follow me: https://t.co/OO9SvuJmhQ https://t.co/MVxVKJuaEv…
Katılım Ocak 2021
307 Takip Edilen88 Takipçiler

@Yayay82827 @PaulDefend48276 @Ron_M_Swiss Such a fucking coward all you presented was narrative differences are not contradictions
A debated chronology that's been harmonizations
The existence of later texts irrelevant to early oral consistency.
You've refuted nothing cunt eyes.
English

Muslims: Show us where Jesus said "I am God" in exactly these words, only from his own mouth.
Christians: Our book says over and over that Jesus is God. That's why you must frame the question in this specific way. Now show us one clear statement in the Quran that tells you to write down Hadiths, use them to interpretate the Quran and make a sunnah.
Muslims: … 🤐
English
Chris Trade retweetledi
Chris Trade retweetledi

Everyone talks about buying stocks but almost no one talks about when to exit.
Here’s Charlie Munger explaining his approach to selling investments.
Save this timeless advice.
Milk Road Macro@MilkRoadMacro
If you invest in equities, listen to this. Charlie Munger explains what he did when his portfolio fell 50%. Save this to stay ahead of the curve.
English
Chris Trade retweetledi
Chris Trade retweetledi
Chris Trade retweetledi

Charlie Munger: "99% [of people] will be in the bottom 99%. That's just the way it's going to work."
"In my generation, the nerds who were patient and rational eventually did well — who lived within their income and worked at being sensible and when they saw an opportunity grabbed it pretty fiercely. I think that will work for the new nerds of the world."
English
Chris Trade retweetledi
Chris Trade retweetledi

Harry Markopolos was the whistleblower who revealed the Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme years before it became widely known.
Markopolos, a financial analyst at a firm competing with Madoff's, embarked on a mission to decode Madoff's investment strategy.
Through his investigation, he concluded that Madoff was defrauding investors.
Describing himself as a "math geek," Markopolos reached his conclusion by analyzing the numbers and identifying that Madoff's reported returns were mathematically impossible.
In 2001, he presented his evidence to the SEC and reached out to several journalists, yet his warnings were ignored, leaving him to live "in fear for his life."
Markopolos believed his warnings were disregarded by the SEC because the agency's staff lacked the necessary financial expertise to understand the fraud he had uncovered.
This oversight would lead to significant embarrassment for the SEC when Madoff's scheme was finally exposed in 2008.
The Biggest Ponzi Schemes in History historydefined.net/the-biggest-po…


English
Chris Trade retweetledi

The Injeel Dilemma
The notion of the "Injeel" in the Quran is presented either coherently or incoherently.
If the Injeel in the Quran is presented coherently, then the Injeel is the Christian Bible (because when we take all the relevant verses together, this is the best coherent fit of what it might be referring to). But in this case Islam is false because the Quran confirms our Bible which contradicts it.
If the Injeel is presented incoherently in the Quran, then Islam is false (because God doesn't say or allow incoherency in His speech).
Either way, Islam is false.
English

@ahmedsa26040093 @onionkknight @rupen_chowdhury You claim our book is corrupted and Islam is the preserved book. Numbers 23:19 God does not lie, does not change his mind. Isaiah 40:8 word of our God will stand forever.
So God lied changed his nature no regard to his dignity 4 his words to be corrupted.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @onionkknight @rupen_chowdhury Only an ignorant one finds contradictions - where there are none!
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera And the real argument now is not that God cannot incarnate. The real tension between Islam and Christianity is why would he, because that will answer about Gods nature.
Blood atonement vs legalism
Justification by Faith vs justification by law
Abraham vs Muhammad.
English

Oh I understand what you mean
So yes God has free will to do anything he wants but that doesn’t mean that he will do something that contradicts His Majesty
He has free will to do but he won’t
He has free will to be unjust be he won’t
He has free will to cry in agony by he won’t
Having a free will isn’t a green card to commit acts that are not appropriate for an All powerful, all merciful God to do
English

Muslims call this guy their best apologist…
The Orthodox Muslim@muslimorthodoxy
Isn’t it funny that all religions try to hijack Jesus PBUH and claim him as their own ? Get your own guy!
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Saying GOD won’t do X because it’s inappropriate misunderstands SOVEREIGNTY.
The incarnation, including Christ’s real human suffering, is fully within that sovereign free will OF fully God, fully acting, fully majestic, and fully free.
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Your logic now God does not have the free will to enter creation because he will cease to be God.
Remember you guys collapse essence and action to mean the same thing.
God changed when he created, God changed when he speaks.
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera The Quran is not the word of God. You've failed to provide Muhammad actually met Gabriel. Wheres the proof? Your god makes the same human logical error of the trinity, doesn't understand metaphysics but besides that, legally it is has no legal standing.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera The Quran is the word of Gods
The Gospels are the biographies of the life of Jesus
The Quran in itself proves it can only come form God
The Gospels must establish eyewitness authorship and mutual attestation to be credible
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Forgiving sins → Mark 2:5-12
Accepting worship Matthew 14:33, 28:9,17
Authority over nature Mark 4:39
Unique Sonship Mark 1:1, Luke 1:32-35
So the claim that they ignored divinity purposely is false.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera So Mark, Luke and Matthew ignored that Jesus is God purposely?
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Then God ceased to be God simple and God doesn't not have sovereign free will simple.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera So God became a man; plain and simple
That’s a change of nature
As God was not a man
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera So you hold the Bible to a higher standard but when it comes to the Quran it's trust bro.
Thats not good enough. Answer the question.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera The Quran is the proof
If you read it; you will know it can’t come from a human
English

@Randomlyscript @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera John and the Synoptics are complementary, not inaccuracies.
John emphasizes Jesus’ divinity,
the Synoptics emphasize His mission. Different emphases do not equal historical inaccuracies.
English

@ChrisTrade4 @Fitrah46782412 @9ushaman @deusimpera Let’s keep it simple
John has explicit divine claims of Jesus such as I Am and others
These are all absent from the Synoptics
So accepting John as historical means the Synoptics are not historical
English









