

The Fifth Doctor
671 posts

@4_doctors
"4 out of 5 doctors recommend...." If you are like me, you look at what the fifth guy says.💜





Neither Safe, Nor Effective nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-… In the aftermath of the National Citizens Inquiry press conference held on September 14th, we are pleased to make available the commissioners' interim report and an open letter to Prime Minister @JustinTrudeau from the NCI Administrator. You can access these documents by following the link below! #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #CommissionersReport #NeitherSafeNorEffective #cdnpoli #COVID19 #CovidVaccine

In a society with Non corrupt legacy media Every headline would announce this In letters Two inches high From the CDC itself: NEW COVID VARIANT MORE LIKELY TO INFECT THE VACCINATED




AHA Journal Link: ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.116… Non-Paywall / Archived Links: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… archive.is/ki1fm

Unreal to check my email about what's trending in @NEJM & see our article is #1 most viewed🤯. I mean, I agree, the boosted having a 20x lower non covid mortality rate than the non-boosted not being disclosed in such an influential study of the 1st booster published in NEJM (nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…) is a huge deal. Such a big deal I had to do the calculation over and over and over. I knew there was bias, but, wow, 94.8% lower non covid mortality among the boosted!? (As skeptical and cynical as I am, I did not see a difference that big coming) Are people now waking up to how misleading observational vaccine data can be? Clearly the authors knew about the bias in the data at least since they wrote the response where they disclosed the non-covid mortality numbers in March of 2022. I have trouble believing they did not know about it at the time of the initial publication in December of 2021. The authors of the original study disclosed no ties to Pfizer but from what I can tell Clalit Health Services is comprised of over half of the Israeli population and the Israeli Ministry of Health had the following agreement about evidence collaboration with Pfizer starting Jan 2021- where Pfizer would be involved in preparing and publishing all results (!). Does anyone know exactly which published studies this applied to? ghiaa.org/provision_docu… At any rate, the study published in NEJM we can now see was biased to such an extent, at least I do not think it should have been published. Without a doubt, what is currently written in the article (about a 90% lower covid mortality rate among the boosted is very misleading.... as that was EXPECTED given the underlying differences in health!). We will be writing more on this topic as all of us in medicine should be aware of the potential for these biases. Very excited this letter @VPrasadMDMPH , Ram Duriseti and I wrote has been able to generate so much attention. Have a great Sunday, friends! Link to our letter : nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

“The government really broke all standards by colluding with tech to suppress speech instead of giving the public more information like a free society demands and letting the public be persuaded by the data.” bit.ly/44hVZMg


