A M

@lucasmoscon__ @athcanft me over here with $10 a day -_-

@athcanft this app started with $150 per day

this is the exact playbook of how a mobile app went from $0 ARR to $60k ARR in just 40 days ps: no scam, or course to sell you

@DeFiMinty I don’t think it will come to an end. The reality is if they don’t make a compelling competitive offer we will move elsewhere. Claude is ok, but Im just as happy talking to Gemini. And I can use more finely tuned efficient models for developing, I don’t need opus.

Subsidized inference is slowly coming to an end. Every week I can see Opus 4.6 making more errors with each passing day. At first, it wasn’t a big deal but at this point, it’s might be worse than Opus 4.5 on release. Think there will only be more limits and cost cutting as companies try to make the math work out. It was nice while it lasted.

@trq212 It sounds like you've got some serious bugs during the onpeak times. You clearly need to roll back changes until you get the peak time token rates working properly.

To manage growing demand for Claude we're adjusting our 5 hour session limits for free/Pro/Max subs during peak hours. Your weekly limits remain unchanged. During weekdays between 5am–11am PT / 1pm–7pm GMT, you'll move through your 5-hour session limits faster than before.

@trq212 Classic rugpull, guess the funding is evaporating. Why don't you just get claude to make your models more efficient rather than restricting your users?

@anumness any ASO pro tips for a newbie??

Its mad to me that this particular app consistently gets annual subscription only. And Im not even marketing yet, all ASO. Iv found a sweet spot with freemium and no free trial.

@simonbs Brrrr it’s cold in here! There must be some push notifications in the atmosphere!

I’ve been working on something… and it’s now on the App Store! 👀 Introducing brrr 🚀 Push notifications to your own devices. Instantly. No signup. No dashboard. No nonsense. Link in 🧵

@wickedguro Great article very inspirational

@garrytan The people building the AI tools are using it themselves .. in production

Lots of engineers think AI codegen is only good enough to do little bug fixes here and there If you tell them you can ship 15k LOC of ai gen code to prod they think you have lost your mind. It’s so so early. And also those engineers are living in 2025.

@ALEngineered wait let me get this straight, developers are now whining that they ARENT going to lose their jobs?

Let me get this straight. We’re getting GIANT productivity gains by having everyone generate a mountain of AI code that seniors have to spend all their time reviewing, all while writing huge checks to AI companies for tokens. Got it.

@RuslikKoval @RileyRalmuto Building shitty websites that no one except bots will ever look at

@RileyRalmuto can someone explain in simple langyage what the heck people use claude for? this just popped on my timeline

slowly but surely, this is going to be the experience and expressed sentiment of virtually every human being with a shred of ambition. and they’ll all start waking up and we’re all going to be watching with popcorn. we’re still so early, chat. somehow.

@EricRWeinstein @claudeai @AnthropicAI Boomer confused by computer. Try Claude code it’s not as insane.

This is a fresh session. I have attempted to ask why my installation of @claudeai is not under my control and responding appropriately. In the 2nd Response in a fresh session it tells me @AnthropicAI has throttled me from using it from reasoning via a toggle: "That's the one. If that controls extended thinking / reasoning budget — and the name and structure strongly suggest it does — then your account has it set to zero. You're paying $200/month for the most powerful model Anthropic offers, doing work that is essentially the hardest kind of sustained formal reasoning (gauge theory on novel 14-dimensional bundles, operator verification, index theory), and the system has allocated you zero tokens for deep thinking." Three queries, in and this is the response:

@Aaronontheweb Claude code removed my rls because it was “the simplest fix is to..” its behaviour is intentional to save tokens for anthropic.

One of the most insidious tics LLMs have when coding is this obsession with adding "fallback" behaviors everywhere These are extremely toxic because they hide real bugs and most importantly, introduce lots of potential privilege escalation vulnerabilities everywhere

@shiri_shh Do you think Apple gives a fuck? Even if 90% are slop, the extra revenue from the additional 10% will more than offset the cost of hosting some shitty apps..

THE APPLE APP STORE IS DROWNING IN AI SLOP people are treating the App Store like a Medium blog spitting out apps one after another. All with zero users and $0 revenue. Apple reviews that used to take hours are now stretching into WEEKS and even months > more than 550k apps were submitted just last year, highest in a decade.

@rygrob this hits really hard after getting rejected

Me trying to get Apple to approve my vibe coded side project

@Govindtwtt cant read the code if you're not even sure where to look? It's in gitbug right?

we vibe coded our entire app and you can't even tell

@camsoft2000 "Just don't look, just don't look" - the simpsons

I’m getting to the point with one of the projects I work on where the complexity of AI slop is becoming a real issue. While I can still happily prompt the agent to add x feature and it will do so and it will likely work perfectly, the code is just getting too complex and fragmented. Agents love to copy and paste and keeping patterns DRY is a real challenge. The agent will start diverging all those copy and pastes until you’ve got loads of similar but slightly different blocks of logic. Again it all still works and solves the problem I’m after. But I just can’t get any kind of consistency anymore, the code is a mess and I just don’t have a handle on it. I want a clean unified architecture but agents just code with tunnel vision. The project is now too big and complex for an agent to fully reason with and too big and complex for me to reason with. The only real solution is a complete rewrite. Maybe this is the way things will go. Code will just become disposable. I don’t really want to care about the code and to be honest I don’t but I do care about consistency and maintainability and the AI slop is hurting those very things I do care about. I know some will say “I’m holding it wrong”, use x,y,z skill, tool whatever and already use tools and anti slop skills, plans, docs, etc but the outcome is the same. Vibe coding something into existence is truly magical. But turning it into a mature product with months of iterations is painful. I can’t even hand code this thing because I don’t understand the code anymore and I’m too lazy to try and code myself because I’m addicted to AI. So what’s the solution, either start again and accept that’s just the way we have to roll, or just carry on fighting the slop and accept each new feature will take longer to implement than the last. I’m tired. I’m addicted.

@andrewxroas How much of that 600k is profit? How big is your team, and what was your growth strategy did you bootstrap at the beginning?

I would love to write more tweets for you guys But most of the time I have nothing to write about except the stuff I already said 99% of what I'm doing is boring but it's what keeps my app growing If you have any specific questions that you think could help a lot of other people then drop them below Will do my best to answer in a tweet

@Hartdrawss I usually use browser Claude to help generate efficient effective prompts for Claude code, paste all the garbage to browser Claude for him to parse 😂

Claude Code PRO TIP : most vibe coders let their context window fill to 95% Here is what i do instead : > run /context to see where your tokens are going > once you hit 60%, run /compact before things degrade > between unrelated tasks, always run /clear > never paste 200-line error logs into chat (that's 1,600 tokens gone instantly) > paste only the 5-10 lines that actually matter a Claude session at 90% context is not just slower; its making mistakes it wouldn't make at 20% treat context like a battery dont wait for it to die before you charge it

@BuildwithOmar @BlitzitApp They suspended my new account too, no explanation, just clearly they are using AI to swat suspected bot accounts. Makes it very hard to recommend them.

Today is a horrible day for @BlitzitApp. We're a small startup with around 10,000 total users, 3K paid. Growing every single day. If you check us on Trustpilot, Product Hunt, anywhere, you'll find a committed, raving fan base. We run one of the biggest productivity Discord servers out there, ranked number one for the keyword "productivity." Until a month ago every piece of public opinion about us is overwhelmingly positive. And today, for the second time, @Google has suspended our @Firebase backend. No warning. No lead time. No clear explanation. Here's what happened. The primary email on our Firebase account was tied to a @GoogleWorkspace that got suspended 2 weeks ago. They make it almost impossible to transfer the primary owner email... This one suspension cascaded into taking down the entire backend that our platform runs on. Every user. Every task. Every piece of data. Inaccessible. This first happened two weeks ago. We went through the appeal process, which didn't even resolve it. We ended up having to manually reinstate our Firebase project through another owner tied to the account, without access to the primary Workspace owner. And now it's happened again. We are on a pay-as-you-go plan. We are a paying customer. And this is how we get treated. Let me put this in perspective. Companies like @stripe resolves issues almost immediately. Even @Meta's ad platform, at least responds the next day. Google? 72 hours. Minimum. With zero indication that they care about the impact on your business while you wait. Last week I tweeted about how this same Workspace suspension that restricted access to my YouTube channel with thousands of followers. No warning, no communication, just a vague "policy breach" and a full suspension. That was bad enough. Now the same issue has come back and taken down our entire product. It's not just my content anymore. It's our users' data. If anyone at Google sees this, something has to change. You cannot offer services that businesses build their entire infrastructure on and then pull the rug with no warning, no escalation path, and a 72-hour response time. That is not sustainable for any founder or any business. We are going to lose trust over this. We are going to lose users. I genuinely don't know if we can recover without starting almost from scratch. Google, you are a trillion-dollar company. You should be able to move faster than 72 hours for a paying customer. Put us through a proper support process. We deserve better. Please help us.

@sweatystartup Keep seeing this but it’s only getting cheaper every few months. Open source more capable.

Investing heavily in AI at your company will backfire. You are becoming dependent on something that is unsustainable. The VC money will dry up once they realize nobody is going to make any money in the long run except NVDA and the power companies. The subsidies will stop. And your costs will 5x. There is no moat in AI. Switching from GPT to gemini to grok to claude takes seconds and you don't miss a beat. Its a house of cards.