Dylan Sepper

5.3K posts

Dylan Sepper

@ArkTic666

انضم Ağustos 2023

95 يتبع59 المتابعون

@Layserguy @MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig Yeah, which is how I see the problem pictured above. It shouldn't matter until you get to the word problems that someone is doing 4 3's or 3 4's. They both are addition based ways to express 3×4.

English

ᛒᚤᚾᚾL∈@Layserguy·9m

@ArkTic666 @MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig In your case, you're introducing Sets and additional properties. 3 Sets of Size 4 is not the same as 4 Sets of Size 3. But if someone told you to "Arrange 12 boxes in a 3 by 4" No one in their right mind will care if you do "3 stacks of 4" "4 rows 3 colums" etc.

English

Daddy Warpig@DaddyWarpig·18h

Teachers too stupid to understand that four threes and three fours are the exact same thing shouldn't be teachers. Besides, even in baby-talk multiplication, the kid is right. "take three four times" Fire the teacher, burn their last paycheck, send them to Alaska.

Math Files@Math_files

Teachers who are incapable of controlling their emotions towards children they're meant to be teaching shouldn't be teachers.

English

164

1.9K

21.4K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·14m

@Layserguy @MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig Yes, however you and I know that in the context of the proposed question, the linguistics would be meaningless. As it is not a word nor context based problem, just flat math. Yes, 3 bags of 4 apples each is different from 4 bags of 3 apples each. But 3×4 and 4×3 both equal 12.

English

ᛒᚤᚾᚾL∈@Layserguy·24m

@ArkTic666 @MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig Worth noting that, We can recognize that "3 lots of 4" and "4 lots of 3" could have a difference in terms of linguistics. It's like going "adding 2 to 4 is not the same as adding 4 to 2" in terms of Math there is zero meaningful difference. "These two pictures are not the same"

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·17m

@MiffedScientist @DaddyWarpig 2. There is no word problem context with the question, which is the only context in which on could meaningfully say that 4×3 and 3×4 are actually different. As far as I remember, math is communicative. So 3+3+3+3 would be the same as 4+4+4.

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·21m

@MiffedScientist @DaddyWarpig 2 issues. 1. I was literally taught the opposite, specifically for the sake of simplicity. So 3×4 would in fact be 3+3+3+3, as my teacher would say "add 3 together 4 times". I don't necessarily care if what your saying is considered "proper", it's needlessly overly complicated.

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·26m

@D_epistates @DaddyWarpig @ThePhysicsMemes Show your work or shut the fuck up. It is 20 shades of retarded for someone to make such a statement without proof specifically because of the fact that this post was him posting his proof.

English

Demosio Epistates@D_epistates·1h

@DaddyWarpig @ThePhysicsMemes We'll take your logic and apply it to frequency and your logic just became mathematically incorrect

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·32m

@MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig You are just as much of an idiot as he is. Here, have someone much more eloquent then me explain it to you. x.com/Layserguy/stat…

ᛒᚤᚾᚾL∈@Layserguy

@JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig Please remove yourself from the field Multiplication being commutative means "A x B" is Identical to "B x A" So writing out "3 x 4" as "3 + 3 + 3 + 3" is Equally correct to writing it out as "4 + 4 + 4"

English

A Defibaugh@MissDefibaugh·7h

@JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig I'm a retired math teacher. You are correct. The people arguing with you and insulting you don't understand math theory.

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@raxxan7 @The_RomaArmy I mean, the "are you sure" question not being there is probably because that procedure is reversible. Someone telling a woman who is getting a irreversible procedure that will permanently stop her from bearing children that she should probably talk to her husband is reasonable.

English

XIAMI@raxxan7·5h

It is pretty one sided though…. If a man warns to get a vasectomy he isn’t denied because he has no children. They don’t ask him if his wife wants kids. Childbirth can KILL you Paying child support does not. Men abandon their children consistently and some don’t necessarily get that same option because the child came out of them. The reason women have more option to different birth control is BECAUSE they want a way to control our bodies. Men can just run rampant and get as many women as they want pregnant.

English

6.4K

Chloe Roma@The_RomaArmy·20h

The assumption that Men have bodily autonomy is HILARIOUS. Men can be forced into fatherhood, forced into 18 years of financial obligation, and even drafted to die all without consent. They have to pay their rapists child support, they have no access to birth control other than condoms, and they CAN NOT abandon a child if unwanted. Women can access abortion, safe haven law, give up their parental rights to CFS, 10 different birth controls AND tubal ligation. Let’s stop pretending this is one-sided.

ً@wynrosei

You want to ban abortion??? Then force VASECTOMIES at 18. Reversible. Low risk. Zero deaths. Or is bodily autonomy only for men??? Answer wisely!

English

150

1.3K

13.9K

549.6K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@NigSplaining @ChoukaiKaiNi Yeah, I get you. Just one of the many cultural idiosyncrasies of the Japanese.

English

137

🫵🏿@NigSplaining·1h

@ArkTic666 @ChoukaiKaiNi I see.. I wouldn’t give a shit if I got funny looks or shame for leaving early if I finish my work for the day, I still got more free time.

English

153

〘 Shigure 〙@ChoukaiKaiNi·11h

Is it legitimately hard to get fired at a Japanese work place? Like I hear if they hate you, they won't give you work. So can I sit around all day and make money doing nothing?

English

15K

967.4K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@IKickDogs911 @ChoukaiKaiNi Many companies really won't, for a variety of reasons. I suppose eventually they would put you on an improvement plan of some kind, just to give them a reason to get rid of you. But companies out there like to sell themselves as great places to work, and no fired people looks 🤌

English

395

World's Worst Person@IKickDogs911·1h

@ArkTic666 @ChoukaiKaiNi So...if i just stare at the wall and disassociate for 8 hours they aren't gonna do shit?

English

439

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@DudeGlorious12 @HartwinTheGreat @ChoukaiKaiNi Never said I LIKED the practice. Just that I am familiar with it.

English

DudeGlorious@DudeGlorious12·1h

@ArkTic666 @HartwinTheGreat @ChoukaiKaiNi Well this just sounds extremely evil all around

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@NigSplaining @ChoukaiKaiNi Nope, because that manager or supervisor is just doing their job as dictated by the company. If anything a manager that gets people to quit would be looked at as a good thing by the company, as the company doesn't want the person there.

English

516

🫵🏿@NigSplaining·1h

@ArkTic666 @ChoukaiKaiNi but there is no shame for the supervisor/manager to waste the employee’s time doing bullshit? I wouldn’t feel shame at that point, i’d just reverse it as spite.

English

562

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@DudeGlorious12 @HartwinTheGreat @ChoukaiKaiNi x.com/ArkTic666/stat…

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666

@HartwinTheGreat @DudeGlorious12 @ChoukaiKaiNi This right here. Great addition. It also benefits then by making it so they can avoid paying unemployment pay and benefits to the person once they are gone.

QME

112

DudeGlorious@DudeGlorious12·1h

@HartwinTheGreat @ArkTic666 @ChoukaiKaiNi But if this culture is so normalized doesn’t everyone know the trick by now? So like what’s the point lol

English

239

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

English

197

Hartwin The Great@HartwinTheGreat·1h

@DudeGlorious12 @ArkTic666 @ChoukaiKaiNi They do it so they can advertise their company as never having fired someone. Makes it seem like a better place to work for potential new hires

English

224

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@omusubirolling1 sometimes partially, sometimes fully, by whatever company they are developed by.

English

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@omusubirolling1 Another big thing I have been getting from this recent bout of discourse from Japanese people about game companies is a question. Do game companies own part or all of the game IP's that gets created in house? Cause it is that way here in the west. Games made in house are owned

English

はくまい🍉日常垢@omusubirolling1·23h

少しずつ日本と西側の違いが分かってきた。どうやら西側ではEAのトラウマというものがあって「大企業=インディーズの天才クリエイター達を潰してゲームで儲けた悪の帝国」という共通認識があるっぽい…？その悪の帝国が勝手にサービスを終了した=作品が殺された　という認識なのかな、多分。

Brodie Robertson@BrodieOnLinux

There's such a different response to this from Japanese fans and everyone else, most people are happy about a dead game being brought back by the community. But I've seen a bunch of Japanese fans angry about this because it goes against the wishes of Square Enix.

日本語

269

5.6K

756.8K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@CoconutCossack As I responded to someone else about this same topic, do a chargeback. The worst that will happen is that you would be banned from all future comic cons, which from the sounds of it doesn't really matter anyways for you.

English

168

CoconutCossack🥥@CoconutCossack·7h

Tried to talk with the organisers about this...they accused me of being in some group, then blocked and "banned" me from the event ??

CoconutCossack🥥@CoconutCossack

Well damn, looks like comiccon just banned all military-themed cosplays a week before the event, tf do I do now?

English

24.8K

Dylan Sepper أُعيد تغريده

Дутчи ||†@DutchyVye·5h

@CoconutCossack If they didn't refund your ticket call your bank and do a charge back. Fuck these people.

English

209

2.3K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@lightningbrn0 @MizutamariVT You see that is OK because the company, who as I explained previously is usually part owner of the series in question, is directly involved with that offline version.

English

生姜焼き@lightningbrn0·11h

@MizutamariVT 3.企業とファンがクラウドファインディングを行いオフライン版を出したこれらは日本で批判を浴びていないなぜならば今回と違い作者の承諾をしっかりと得ているからです

日本語

4.4K

Mizutamari💧• Puddle Yokai@MizutamariVT·12h

It's been really weird to see all the japanese people that openly state preservation as a bad thing. Not like the "don't pirate it if its gone" cause there can be confusion there on the exact meaning. But genuinely people saying the act of trying to preserve something is a moral failing that makes you a bad person. It's such a bizarre belief but I can believe it, especially when several JP gaming companies have had to rely on western preservation efforts in order to recover lost data.

English

1.5K

38K

Dylan Sepper@ArkTic666·1h

@lightningbrn0 @MizutamariVT No, that's not how it works. I will go a step further, and tell you that most series are owned by both the author/creator of that series AND the publisher it was made by. So the corporations are REQUIRED to be involved simply because they are part owner like 90% of the time.

English

生姜焼き@lightningbrn0·11h

@MizutamariVT 正式な手順をもって作者に頼むことはできないのか？日本の例では 1.古いPCゲームをファンがリマスターし作者に尋ねたところ、「今回に限り許可」と公式サイトで配布された 2.終了したオンラインゲームをパブリッシャーが海外ローカライズさせて復活させた

日本語

اكتشف

@Layserguy @MissDefibaugh @JerseyGeneral34 @DaddyWarpig @MiffedScientist @D_epistates @ThePhysicsMemes @raxxan7