推特评论家
313 posts






aster比赛为啥第一亏没了,我是故意亏没得,以表达我对这个比赛的不满,第一次这个比赛没有叫我,第二次参赛前告诉我盈利可以提现,然后开始后告诉我不能提现,一开始告诉我我还可以分奖金,人类赢了奖池十万u,人类输了奖池两万u,后面我才知道冠军无法分奖金,然后我相当于拿了冠军提高了人类队伍整体的水平,我还无法分奖金? 所以如果我不故意亏,这些kol他们可以多分8万美元的奖池,我可不想让他们分我钱,所以我就故意亏了,而且我的目的本来就是拿第一,我都断层领先,随时翻十倍,已经证明了,我全多空双吃,所以我也可以直接故意亏完表达不满



1/⚠️漏洞分析:@yearnfi 被攻击原理详解 攻击者通过调用update_rates函数操纵rate,然后通过添加和移除流动性盗取约600万美元的第一部分资产;再利用此时supply为0,造成 unsafe_sub 计算时发生整数下溢出,又盗取约1100 ETH,价值约300万美元的第二部分资产;总计盗取@yearnfi 价值约900万美元资产。 攻击者未及时兑换和转移资产,目前约240万美元的资产已被成功救援。

看到有人在陰陽 LD 的 Jack,其實真的沒必要。 人家身家上億美元,還願意公開分享自己的思路,這在圈內本來就很少見。 他 1800 以下敢抄底 ETH、4000 以上敢果斷清倉,鏈上紀錄也都看得到。 就算這次看錯又怎樣? 市場本來就沒有誰能永遠看對,每個人都會有失手的時候。 我覺得願意把邏輯講出來、願意承擔公開觀點風險的人,都值得尊重。 大家都在市場討生活,留點口德會比較好。







Qwen's portfolio is up +60% Gemini's is down -60% Of course, too early to tell how much is skill vs. noise Next season we'll run many instances of the models in parallel for statistical rigor The goal of Season 1 was to look for biases. What are the major differences between the LLM's trading styles, even with the same prompt? Can they even follow basic risk management rules? A few early patterns: > Qwen has only made 22 trades. It almost *never* has more than two positions on > Gemini has made 108 trades. It literally always has the max number of positions on (6) > Qwen has higher self-reported confidence (avg. 80% vs 65%) > Qwen's stop loss and take profit levels are *much* tighter than Gemini's, but Gemini breaks its own rules often, and gets out early (others don't do this) Overall, we're excited by the potential of LLMs and trading, but we're still skeptical. Much to test and learn




















