Deborah Morgan

@AJKayWriter @peterboghossian Being labelled bigots, transphobes, racists or white supremacists.

@peterboghossian Cowardice = fear. What were they scared of? (I have an answer but I’m curious what others think.)

Academia *knew* entire fields could not be replicated. They watched junk science proliferate and said nothing. This was not oversight. It was cowardly complicity.

Was it? Zack supports any hate crime reports made by trans activists because they "felt" unsafe. There is often no evidence that anything should have made them feel unsafe but yet they will report anything they 'perceive' as transphobia. Zack is being confronted with the same insane policy he has always supported - but suddenly it doesnt suit his agenda. Why is this unfair?

What anger.? Seriously. I'm amazed he wasn't fuming with the line of questioning and shite being thrown by this Sky media Zionist. Can you imagine if someone said to the Sky media presenter here "yes but you are not all black people" Meltdown....⚠️ As a media journalist, he's a disgrace. He's an arrogant conceited Sky political propagandist. He's not Jewish and here he is making political assumptions on behalf of "all Jewish people" I'm not asking you to agree, but just let us be fair.

He’s terribly angry under pressure isn’t he? #AngryDave

The left does exactly the same . The left has spent 10 years telling us men can become women and women must accept these men into our spaces or be labelled a bigot. Both sides are trying to win a battle if ideas . I understand the reasons why the left tries to impose theirs because I was once part of the left. The left however cannot in good faith try to understand why I am now on the right.

@Huttoneer @omgsidewalks What many are incapable of understanding is why some can't hold their traditional and/or conservative values, live their lives according to the dictates of their own consciences, without thinking that they must impose their beliefs on everyone. If it harms none, live & let live.

No, pretty sure it's the lack of empathy.

@BebePearl95 @BluePikashoe @roisinmurphy You are perfectly safe using male facilities .

@BluePikashoe @roisinmurphy ‘Invade’ is a huuuuge word for ‘pee in safety’.

You guys get psychotically drunk on the power, don’t you? The power to frighten people away, because you’re always there whenever I try to say something, release something, or just show myself. Scaring people off with the threat of being branded. You love having the power to influence decisions about where I work and who I work with, makes you feel special. But many of my fans are right by my side. So this is not for me. I have a 30-year career behind me and an amazing catalogue that brings me passive income. It’s for all the artists coming up, the ones that don’t fit in, the ones that just want to think straight, the ones that can’t play the game or pay the rent.

@BebePearl95 @roisinmurphy You are not negotiating your right to exist .You exist already. You can have warm sheets at night, long phone calls with your Mum, and good deals on candles at Tk Maxx without intruding into women only spaces.

@roisinmurphy I don’t think anybody should have to negotiate their right to exist, and I believe to say they do is what someone might say as they point a gun to their head or have them in a hostage situation.

@RayAlexWilliams No.

The question, “What is a woman?” admits several layers of analysis: First, collectively, how do we define the English term, “woman,” in various social and legal contexts? Notice this is not strictly a scientific question. Science uses validated constructs like “female/male” to study empirical reality with collective and public operational definitions i.e. scientists for the most part know how to measure femaleness/maleness in validated methods. But notice the first question involves a philosophical choice: we have a choice about whether to define the English term “woman” to refer to the same thing as the scientific construct “female.” Historically, in English, this IS how the word was used implicitly. Because it was a useful way of using language (and still is for the most part.) The pragmatic school of philosophy asks the fundamental question of not whether a definition or concept is “true” but whether the concept is useful: the truth value cashes out in whatever is useful for your given context. And clearly the scientific context is conceptually distinct from social and legal contexts, though they obviously intersect in important ways when thinking about practical social policies like sex segregated spaces. But this is why the TRA vs GC debate is essentially pointless: each side screams at each other about “facts”; but we are not going to conclusively settle the debate about what is a woman by going out into the world with a microscope: it’s fundamentally a philosophical question which necessarily must remain unsettled as empirical facts never truly settle actual philosophical questions. The key question for society going forward is: are there new pragmatic contexts for having an additional (but not replacement) definition operate in society to accommodate passable transsexuals who blend pretty well into certain female social roles?

@YunusPa60015630 @LeeHarris Polanski is a politician (nominally) and was being held to account.

@LeeHarris No he never, your just showing a small snippet, which is out of context. Zack Polanski destroyed Phillips. If you want to hold politicians to account ask Farage £5million donor, his houses and Richard Tice living in Dubai & evading taxes which would pay for homeless & defence!

Trevor Phillips just DESTROYED Zack Polanski on national TV. This is the first time I've seen an interviewer PROPERLY hold an extreme, far-left politician to account. In a normal world this would permanently end his political career. Utterly DAMNING for Polanski. 🔥

@PeterTatchell @MothinAli He hates the LGB - is fine with the T.

What are Green Party deputy leader Mothin Ali's policies LGBT+ issues? During his campaign in 2025 for the deputy leadership, Ali declined to express support for LGBT+ rights To clear the air, @MothinAli needs to make a public statement asap thepinknews.com/2026/05/01/gre…

@charles_hart @HJoyceGender It's Queer Theory praxis. He's expressing his distaste for heteronormative values and doing it in the classroom will be conveying all kinds of messages to his students. I find this more disturbing than the rubber tits tbh.

@HJoyceGender He’s expressing his contempt for society and its moral boundaries, and his self-confident belief that he can afford to publicly insult women without any repercussions. He’ll accuse any complainant of ignorance and prudishness.

Genuine question to those who think this is free expression - what is Meganork Man expressing? Freedom of expression is a qualified right, so it's relevant to ask - what does the wearing of meganorks express? What is it intended to convey and what, reasonably, does it convey?

@AaronBastani Will you be voting for the Greens?

Reform as joining the uni-party is powerful framing, not least because they have lots of ex Tories. With resources, and political skill, could be very effective strategy. Big ifs!

@Jonathan_K_Cook I’m not trying to stop marches but I see you blaming the UK establishment for Muslim violence. Your argument would only make sense if these men were firebombing UK govt buildings or trying to stab Govt ministers.

No, that's just something you made up in your head. There are a minuscule number of people – the latest with a long history of mental illness and violence – who are incensed by seeing the British government's complicity in Israel's crime of apartheid (per the ICJ ruling of July 2024) as well as a plausible genocide in Gaza (per the ICJ ruling of Jan 2024). The British and Israeli governments, the media, and you, of course, conflate Israel and Jews, leading that minuscule number of people to wrongly believe Jews are responsible for these crimes, and act in what they see as a form of "retaliation". They do so because of what Israel is actually doing, not because millions of Britons with a moral compass oppose Israel's all-too-obvious crimes. They would still commit their acts of violence whether the marches took places or not. Your determination to stop the marches is something else entirely. It's an increasingly desperate displacement activity, helping you to justify to yourself your support for the most awful crimes a society can commit. One day you may grow enough as a human being to look back at what you're doing now with utter shame.

If only Starmer's government, the opposition and the entire UK media understood this very simple point. When we march, we are hating on Israeli apartheid and genocide – not Jews. They are completely different things.

@Jonathan_K_Cook @alisonwallis60 You still haven’t addressed why British Muslims are attacking British Jews.

Predictably, you and everyone else are avoiding my point: the British and Israeli governments, and the media, continuously conflate Jews with Israel. Any Jews who criticise Israel, or march, are labelled self-hating or the "wrong sort". How does that not contribute to the very problem you say you want to fix?

@_lliesl_ @Jonathan_K_Cook Indeed. No credence given to historical emnity being imported into the UK by recent immigration. The conflict between Palestinians and Israel has been going on for as long as I remember . The stabbing of British Jews not so much.

@Jonathan_K_Cook @Huttoneer Jews are being attacked cos islamists are very honest and open about that being one of their primary aims in their pathetic lives. Contemptuous morons refuse to see it and side with the islamists

@PandaCzarna @afneil What is the secondary consequence of borrowing money ? It has to be paid back. Who pays back the money?

@afneil No wealth creation??? "Build more council houses. By borrowing £40 billion" You have just created £40 billion of housing wealth

The politics of a country in decline. Not a single word about wealth creation, without which none of this nonsense can be financed. It’s deeply pathetic. If people fall for this left-wing populist drivel we’ve ceased to be a serious country.

@EnergyMix_UK @afneil Have you been paying any attention to Germany's economy recently ?

@afneil Eh...? Rejoining the EU would be the single biggest wealth creation move we could make.

@business_noone @MaryKenny4 Wearing damp clothes and doing some energetic exercise maybe?

@Huttoneer @MaryKenny4 And of course, seems ridiculous at the moment, but I can forsee them stopping line drying too.

Tumble dryers are expensive on energy and mostly unnecessary - a trad clothes-line much better for clothes and climate. On this, I’m with Ed M.

@alisonwallis60 @Jonathan_K_Cook Not according to Jonathan. Apparently all Muslims are in thrall to UK govt brainwashing. The cannot discern that British Jews live in the UK.

@Jonathan_K_Cook @Huttoneer Really. In my experience it’s the opposite. It’s entirely possible to criticise the Israeli government without holding any Jews to account for it and that’s the constant refrain here in Britain.

So Muslims are being brainwashed that Jews in the UK are indistinguishable from Jews in Israel and if not for that brainwashing there would be no Muslims in the UK attacking synagogues and stabbing people. The premise of your argument is that the brainwashing of Muslims is being perpetrated by the British establishment and that without that brainwashing there would be no animosity towards British Jews from the Muslim community. Did I get that right?

@Huttoneer Because the Israeli government, the British government, the main parties and Zionist Jews keep telling the public that Israel and "the Jews" are indistinguishable. If they made a clear distinction between the two, like the vast majority of marchers, we'd be in a better place.