Minun
3.8K posts


@WDowsing19771 @TheObservr @RomillyA77 @calvinrobinson Can’t be as low-IQ as getting your source from the ever so impartial Wikipedia
English

@TheObservr @Minun_Blue @RomillyA77 @calvinrobinson It's annoying when facts get in the way of your low-IQ bigotry, isn't it
English

@WDowsing19771 @RomillyA77 @calvinrobinson @TheObservr The Jews had a choice between pardoning Jesus or the serial killer Barabbas, they chose the latter and they laughed about it
English

@Minun_Blue @RomillyA77 @calvinrobinson @TheObservr Can you read the highlighted part out loud for me, nice and slowly, 3 times. I want to see if I can get even an antisemite to learn something

English

@RomillyA77 @calvinrobinson @TheObservr Jew in name only, Christianity was supposed to be the next step from Judaism, but the Jews were not happy and had Jesus killed, which they still take collective pride in today.
English

@calvinrobinson @TheObservr Jesus is Jewish, and from a Man of the cloth that's a seriously irresponsible thing to say.
How does being Jewish make it worse? A shit lib's a shit lib, you don't need to add to the pile on, I think they've been through enough already.
English

@TheBritLad Never happeneing without stamping out the Jew problem. You actually think they want to give up their precious golems? They are a means to an end until their last breath.
English

Ok, I've now taken a closer look at the Rape Gang Inquiry report. And exactly as I feared, it's riddled with problems. That's a problem FOR SURVIVORS because it politicises their lives, making it all too easy for the government and institutions to write off their very real experiences as a 'far right dog whistle'.
It also does absolutely nothing to hold the police and social services to account, because the blame for the gangs is laid squarely at the feet of Islam. If the outcome of this report is that the Muslims are driven out of Britain, giving other group free rein to rape our girls, that's not going to be a win for anyone.
Here's 10 issues with the report:
1. The verdict is assumed from the start.
Where were the terms of reference? There are none, so we have no idea what question the inquiry was investigating. Instead it appears to have worked backwards from a premise: "The root cause was immigration, beginning with the British Nationality Act 1948" and "Oil and water do not mix" (both p.3).
2. It proves nothing about prevalence — it found what it went looking for. It set out to examine "predominantly Muslim Pakistani gangs" (p.7), then reports that "the same ethnic and religious profile… [was] documented throughout almost all of the witnesses who contacted the Inquiry" (p.12). Self-selected witnesses confirming the inquiry's own premise is not a finding.
3. The theology chapter refutes itself. It argues Islamic doctrine drives the crimes, then concedes Indian-heritage Muslims "are notably rare compared with those of Pakistani heritage" (p.118). Same scripture, opposite outcome — which points to sociology, not theology.
4. The 250,000 figure is a peer's rhetorical question, recycled.
The report quotes Lord Pearson asking whether "there appear to have been upwards of 250,000 young white girls raped in this century" (p.12) — a question in a Lords debate, not a finding — then treats it as established.
5. It then claims that guess has gained support — and contradicts its own source two pages later.
"this extrapolation now has greater support" (p.12), yet on the next page it concedes the scale is "impossible to quantify precisely" (p.13, summarising the Casey audit). You can't put a hard floor of 250,000 on a number you call unquantifiable.
6. It claims the criminal standard of proof for claims it can't support.
"establishes beyond any doubt" (p.3) and "demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt" (p.159) — that phrase is trial standard, used for figures sourced to a guess and a self-published book.
7. It conflates grooming gangs with all child exploitation to inflate scale.
"almost 19,000 children were identified as sexual exploitation victims in England in one year" (p.13) — that's all CSE in England, not grooming gangs, but it's used to prop up the grooming-gang numbers.
8. Single cases are stretched into decades-long patterns.
"the first recorded case of specifically Pakistani rape gangs dates back to 1955" (p.11) — one 1955 case, used to anchor a claim that the phenomenon was systematic from the 1950s.
9. It has no hierarchy of evidence.
A self-published book ("Easy Meat," p.106) and an advocacy group ("Christian Concern," p.7) are cited with the same weight as the Jay Report, IICSA and the Casey audit.
10. The framing hands every denier a free win.
A Nietzsche epigraph — "Man is the cruellest animal" (p.4); Tommy Robinson listed among "whistleblowers" (p.157); a death-penalty call — "up to and including death" (p.3) and a "death penalty… referendum" (p.159); and collective punishment — perpetrators' "entire immediate family unit must also face deportation proceedings" (p.160), all of which politicise the issue, allowing the government and Lowe's opponents to flatly dismiss the all too real testimonies of survivors.
Overall, the report does exactly what I feared it would - it actively HARMS survivors because the whole issue can now be dismissed as a far-right dog whistle.
This report was created for one reason and one reason only: to create a political vehicle for Lowe, Downes, and their colleagues. Shame on the both of them for using survivors in this despicable way.
English

This is the reaction of a jewish feminist to the fact that 250,000 white british girls were r@ped by immigrant gangs:
English

@iamacat9000 Kinda ironic since the original song was done by a Jew
English

A friendly reminder..
Killa 🌺@KillaKreww
Bobbi Althoff makes her rapping debut on Sukihana’s new song “Bills Paid” 😭🔥🎵
English

They actually had to change the plot from the feminist one with Zendaya cause everyone guessed it was that lmaooo
Shrek@Shrek
It’s happening... it’s really happening! Experience Shrek 5 only in theaters summer 2027.
English

@thelefttake Don’t give 2 shits what you think. Legal or illegal, it doesn’t matter, they are all going back
English

Ash Sarkar is a British citizen who was born in London to a British citizen as has lived in the UK as a British citizen her entire life. Her family can trace its roots in this country back at least 50 years.
Where are you proposing she is deported to?
Glenn - Patriotic Brit and Englishman 🇬🇧@GlennRestore891
A reason I support Restore Britain over Reform UK, meme edition. 👇
English

✅ Thanks for joining the movement.
AFP News Agency@AFP
BREAKING British PM announces ban on social media for under-16s
English

They won’t ban Sikh knives in public but they will ban kids from every social media except from pedophile paradise BlueSky.
How is this country real
Sky News@SkyNews
BREAKING: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced a social media ban for under-16s. Live updates: trib.al/AaXv2Tr
English

@PolitlcsUK Get a vpn, change your location to ‘Israel’ and you’re fine
English

@PolitlcsUK Won’t do anything about BlueSky meanwhile because he’s a Jew, and Jews love CP
English

@NoahsArk1000 They call Christian idol worshippers, and the Jews are the ones that invented idol worship, isn’t something that the kids would call a flex.
English











