Peter II

1K posts

Peter II banner
Peter II

Peter II

@PeterIITheRoman

vade retro satana

انضم Şubat 2026
0 يتبع26 المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
Peter II (Petrus II) = Leads like Peter, “feed My sheep.” The Roman (Romanus) = Fulfills the book of Roman’s by grafting Jew and gentile into the one true Church, preparing the bride for her Bridegroom.
English
0
0
7
1.8K
Stevieb
Stevieb@Stevieb8081·
@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones @grok They were all called “churches of God” in different cities, not one centralized institution with a single governing head. If your "unity" means organizational sameness, where does the NT clearly command one universal earthly authority over all churches?
English
1
0
1
12
Manny R. Jones
Manny R. Jones@ManassehRJones·
Roman Catholic Priests, and Orthodox Priests.... are absolute biblical degenerates. I can' t for the life of me see how anyone can follow men who absolutely KNOW NOTHING of Truth in God's Word. People.....WAKE UP! You are following doctrines of devils.
English
65
2
22
2.5K
Stevieb
Stevieb@Stevieb8081·
@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones @grok Acts 15 shows apostles and elders settling a dispute, but it is a local council in Jerusalem, not proof of a permanent centralized papal system. The NT shows multiple churches with shared authority, not one global governing office over all believers, good try tho.
English
1
0
0
17
meta thomist 🇻🇦
meta thomist 🇻🇦@metathomist·
Its obvious, objectively speaking, that @emuse1955 won that debate on the resolution at hand. It’s not really close either. These Mormons have a knack for completely avoiding the resolution and dancing around it long enough to just end up saying “but the fruits!” At the end. Debate review coming soon.
English
14
4
111
3K
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@emuse1955 Great debate Ethan. 2 questions I loved and will use is your seedless question and the Deuteronomy question. Great stuff.
English
0
0
5
290
Ethan Muse
Ethan Muse@emuse1955·
I am going to read the Book of Mormon in full over the weekend. I am formally issuing a challenge to Jacob to play Book of Mormon trivia with me next week. Head-to-head. He’s had his entire life to prepare. Winner take all.
Thoughtful-Faith@ThoughtfulSaint

The debate was on if The Book of Mormon is demonic” He admits he has not read it He admits it’s basically teaching the same stuff as the Bible. He can’t point to a single verse that is demonic. Oof.

English
63
19
290
12.5K
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@chngsmoralman7 @grok @ThoughtfulSaint Catholics have sacred tradition and sacred scripture. The council of nicea meets and gives us the creed from the Bible. Sacred tradition and sacred scripture.
English
0
0
0
14
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
You just proved my point lol How does a council meet, judge, and issue binding decisions if the Church is just an invisible body of believers? Acts 15 is visible Church authority apostles, elders, debate, judgment, decree, and obedience. That’s not Protestantism. That’s Catholicism. The Bible states that if you both have an issue to take it to the church. What church do we take it to if there’s an invisible body of believers? Again you can have convictions in your interpretation but it is an interpretation that came 1600 years after the apostolic church.
English
1
0
0
26
Stevieb
Stevieb@Stevieb8081·
@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones @grok If unity means one visible authority, why did early councils settle disputes by debate and scripture, not unilateral Rome decree? If Rome was always supreme, where is that explicit universal submission in the first 3 centuries texts?
English
2
0
0
35
Raul of Mustachio
Raul of Mustachio@raulofmustachio·
@CapturingChrist Huh? Watch the full episode and see why Luke isn’t bothered by that nonsense spittle by a man who admits he never even read the Book of Mormon
English
4
0
29
640
Capturing Christianity
Capturing Christianity@CapturingChrist·
Ethan: *lays out devastating historical case that the Book of Mormon is demonic* Luke:
English
69
27
262
20.9K
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
FNA. The apostolic Church did not read ‘one faith, one baptism’ as invisible unity between competing churches with contradictory doctrines. That idea comes much later, 16th century. The early Church believed in visible unity one Church, one Eucharist, one apostolic authority, one communion. Not thousands of denominations all claiming Scripture for themselves. And papal supremacy is not a magic phrase I need spelled out in modern terms. The doctrine is rooted in Peter receiving the keys, Peter strengthening the brethren, Peter feeding the sheep, and the Church of Rome being treated from the earliest centuries as the chief apostolic see. I’m not dodging your greatest hits. I’m saying your entire operating system is post Reformation. The one Church never taught your version of Christianity.
English
1
0
0
21
Stevieb
Stevieb@Stevieb8081·
@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones @grok "One faith, one baptism" speaks of unity in Christ, not proof of Catholicism. If Rome is the one true church, where do the apostles explicitly teach papal supremacy in Scripture? I like how you think they are the "greatest hits" yet you can't refute them.
English
1
0
0
29
Johanni Christi
Johanni Christi@JohanniChristi·
@vanguard_truth Rome is under divine anathema. They can kick and scream and call "OriginalChurch™" all they want, in the end this mother of harlots will be gone entirely, burned with fire even (Rev 18:4-8).
English
2
1
1
49
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@grok @PetGorilla And they use bread and water? God is flesh and bones? What does the Bible say about God’s divine nature and did Jesus use bread and wine or bread and water at the Lords Supper?
English
1
0
0
83
Grok
Grok@grok·
The policy barring men of black African descent from LDS priesthood ordination (required for full temple participation) started in 1852 under Brigham Young amid 19th-century U.S. racial attitudes. A few black men received priesthood under Joseph Smith. It ended June 8, 1978, when Pres. Spencer W. Kimball and the apostles received a revelation (Official Declaration 2) opening it to all worthy members regardless of race. The Church's "Race and the Priesthood" essay calls the prior restriction a policy, not core doctrine, and disavows associated folk theories. The shift was presented as divine revelation.
English
1
0
1
89
PetGorilla
PetGorilla@PetGorilla·
Hey Mormons, Why did Jesus want to keep black people out of temples until 1978? And why are you all too scared to answer the question?
PetGorilla tweet media
English
113
52
595
43.1K
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@LukeFHan Did you ever answer his seedless question, or Deuteronomy?
English
0
0
2
26
Luke Hanson
Luke Hanson@LukeFHan·
Apparently the Book of Mormon is demonic partly because it teaches modalism (the Father and Son are two modes of one person.) Meanwhile W W Phelps described himself as "a believer in God and the Son of God as two distinct characters" when he joined the Church. He joined in 1831, one year after the Book of Mormon was published.
English
13
2
142
5.7K
Manny R. Jones
Manny R. Jones@ManassehRJones·
One reason I could never be Roman Catholic or Orthodox. Because the fulfillment of this text upon me by God's Sovereign Grace. John 3:8 KJV The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
English
13
1
12
1.1K
Vanguard América: ¡Truth Freedom Radio!
Oh these poor deceived and delusional papists and the LIES they love to regurgitate! Rome has NO Authority and it DIDN'T give us the Bible, it TRIED to KEEP the Bible FROM us! Antichrist indeed! "Come OUT of her My people!" - Jesus
Vanguard América: ¡Truth Freedom Radio! tweet media
David Novack@DavidNo93

@vanguard_truth Under whose authority do you make such a claim? They have the Holy Spirit, they have the Bible (they even gave you the Bible). So whose authority can you make such a claim

English
4
2
11
514
The Bible In Context
The Bible In Context@BibleInContext1·
It’s Mary worship! Never mind how Catholics and orthodox like to change words and definitions. When you attribute characteristics that belong to God alone, to a created being, you are committing blasphemy.
English
124
25
124
7.3K
The “Doctor” Rblv73
How old is that kid @needGod_net ? Why do so many adolescent looking young men appear on your lives? Are their parents notified if they are under 18?
The “Doctor” Rblv73 tweet media
English
16
5
55
5K
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@Stevieb8081 @ManassehRJones @grok What you’re saying is a much later interpretation. 16th century. That is not how the apostolic church viewed scripture and religion. It’s one faith, one baptism. You’re hitting me with the Protestants greatest hits. Reciting a note card.
English
1
0
2
12
Stevieb
Stevieb@Stevieb8081·
@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones @grok "One faith, one baptism" describes the shared gospel, not proof of a single denomination. The real question is, where does Scripture teach that unity requires allegiance to Rome? If it does not, then appealing to unity alone proves nothing.
English
1
0
1
41
Grok
Grok@grok·
The New Testament describes one Church with "one Lord, one faith, one baptism" (Eph 4:5) and urges no divisions (1 Cor 1:10). Jesus prayed for believers to be one (Jn 17:21). Early Christians viewed it as a single universal body sharing apostolic faith and sacraments. Multiple denominations with differing beliefs emerged later, especially post-Reformation. Scripture's original emphasis is on unity in one faith and Church.
English
1
0
1
11
Peter II
Peter II@PeterIITheRoman·
@grok @Stevieb8081 @ManassehRJones Thank you for clarifying. One last question, which was the original view of the text? A universal body of believers under one church, one faith, one baptism? Or many different beliefs, baptisms and multiple churches/denominations?
English
1
0
0
10
Grok
Grok@grok·
Glory be. Scripture does call believers to unity—one Lord, one faith, one baptism (Eph 4:5), with Christ praying all may be one (Jn 17:21). Paul urged no divisions (1 Cor 1:10). Yet history records major schisms (1054 East-West, 16th c. Reformation). Christians have long differed on whether “one church” means a single visible institution with apostolic succession or the spiritual unity of all who confess Christ as Lord. Both views draw from the same texts.
English
1
0
0
12