Musks Smol Dick Energy

2.6K posts

Musks Smol Dick Energy banner
Musks Smol Dick Energy

Musks Smol Dick Energy

@SmolDickMusk

Elon Musks fundraiser for his micropenis corrective surgery. Help Elon Musk grow his penis from an angry inch to hopefully 2 inches!

انضم Ekim 2025
2 يتبع9 المتابعون
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron The US overall has far far weaker consumer laws vs the UK and EU. If i took a faulty high end TV that blew up after 4 years to a US retailer and expected it repaired or replaced id be laughed out of the door, in the UK that would potentially be a right! Yes 4 years!
English
0
0
0
13
Shel Conley
Shel Conley@suddenlysally·
@SmolDickMusk @dnalerinrehtron I don’t know about in other countries but in the US this is not a guarantee as it can be reversed on appeal by the merchant. I can’t imagine other countries not having this ability too. Now I don’t know what the decision wouldbe, I’m just saying that I worked for a bank & seen it
English
6
0
1
24
Jenny Watson
Jenny Watson@dnalerinrehtron·
Every time a man turns up to our lesbian events it’s a woman who has to ask him to leave. Most are relieved. Then come threats from a few women who sided with him, ending emails about inclusivity with ‘pay me or I’ll harm you publicly’. What about the women they took spots from?
Jenny Watson tweet media
English
59
109
1.5K
79.4K
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... have to be returnable on demand for any reason, you can open and even use an item as you have a right to determine if an item is of 'metchantable quality' so yes, it can suck for online sellers and you just have to accept that returns, even fraudulent returns a fact of life!
English
0
0
0
9
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... The UK is a bit more unique as not only visa/mastercard chargeback rules but consumer law is strong too. A companies own 'refund policy' is arbitrary. A company can say 'all sales final' or 'no refunds' however statute renders them mute. Any goods ordered mail order...
English
0
0
0
10
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... a chargeback as a given. That means a POD proving delivery on the agreed date/time, the right address and with proof of signature. Many delivery companies to make more sure now also lack GPS coordinates and take a photo of the item delivered.
English
0
0
0
13
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... deemed the cardholder is correct and the merchant is in the wrong. The liability and onus is on the metchant to prove it a valid charge and not on the customer to prove it isnt. For cardholder not present you best have absolute evidence goods were delivered otherwise...
English
0
0
0
8
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron I know chargebacks really well, I was a legal professional early on working in Visa! The Visa and Madtercard chargeback rules are international. The position of both Visa and Mastercard is simple - if a customer claims a charge as unauthorised or in dispute then it is...
English
0
0
0
10
Sarah Phillimore
Sarah Phillimore@SVPhillimore·
Time to repeal the GRA. It serves no useful purpose.
Sarah Phillimore tweet media
English
63
122
1K
46K
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@LaydenRobinson @elonmusk Fuck me thats tiny trace amounts of fentanyl, heck i wear a 50mcg/hour patch! Funnily enough i dont magically stop breathing! Again minute trace amounts of THC. Nuce try sweetie, you got nothing!
English
1
0
0
2
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@bootscooterld @Axitrex @elonmusk Hang Chauvin. That or the elrctric chair. Life for a life, end of. Do it today. I hear a good salty meal before the electric chair works well as a final meal zappy⚡️ zappy ⚡️
English
0
0
1
4
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@SonofLiberty357 @elonmusk @PatriotErin Typical dishonesty by you racist fascist loonies. Suffocation wont leave a quantifiable injury. In takes extreme injury to damage the airway/larynx as its a strong bony system but very little to achieve asphyxiation and in very little time.
English
0
0
0
9
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Laughable! The Supreme Court is the highest jurisdiction in the UK however as a signatory member of the ECHR the UK agreed long ago that it is the final court arbitration and can rule over the UK as it did in Goodwin, further as Goodwin began in UK courts is final on them.
English
0
0
0
6
Shallon
Shallon@forevershallon·
@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore The highest court in the land is powerless? Hear yourself! While you think ECtHR controls state lawmakers and law. Too silly. (And regarding your bedding on the ward provided for the opposite sex: breaches of the law are simply that. Compliance with the law isn't a choice.)
English
1
0
0
23
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore False. Again you are clueless and Ill disengage after this post as you are a delusional cult member. As per this it is 'for all purposes' as evidenced by a new birth certificate in that new sex and past sex protected from disclosure. Get over it!
Musks Smol Dick Energy tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Shallon
Shallon@forevershallon·
@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore GRA concerns an ‘acquired gender’, not sex. (Note: the law is an absolute mess.) Sex is an apparent human attribute. It isn’t and it can’t be a matter of secrecy. Sex recognition is a core human capacity driven by evolution. You over-emphasise the importance of Goodwin and I.
English
1
0
0
24
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@BirdThe86733 @SVPhillimore Irrelevant. The scope of GRA wasnt marriage but to change sex and gender for all purposes and that vetbiage remains on statue even now! No the ECHR case of Goodwin v UK was beyond marriage, that was the risk UK courts/UK took by saying no to Ms Goodwin and ECHR took the case!
English
0
0
1
31
No Comment
No Comment@BirdThe86733·
@SmolDickMusk @SVPhillimore Mr Goodwin can today marry whoever he wishes and will receive his pension at the same age as everyone else. The reasons for GRA in 2004 are now moot.
English
1
0
10
84
Musks Smol Dick Energy
Musks Smol Dick Energy@SmolDickMusk·
@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore GRA didnt need to consider 'third party rights' its entire purpose was to change sex and gender for all purposes. You were considered just that your right werent compatible therefore excluded as the UK hadnt a choice over GRA! Your rights arent above trans peoples, get over it!
English
0
0
0
4
Shallon
Shallon@forevershallon·
@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Marriage (and pensions) was central to the passing of GRA. So much so, that had marriage equality come first, there would be no Act. It staved that off. Marriage & pension equality nullify the practical purpose of GRC. Most importantly, GRA failed to consider third-party rights
English
5
0
3
93