
Musks Smol Dick Energy
2.6K posts

Musks Smol Dick Energy
@SmolDickMusk
Elon Musks fundraiser for his micropenis corrective surgery. Help Elon Musk grow his penis from an angry inch to hopefully 2 inches!
Katılım Ekim 2025
2 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron The US overall has far far weaker consumer laws vs the UK and EU. If i took a faulty high end TV that blew up after 4 years to a US retailer and expected it repaired or replaced id be laughed out of the door, in the UK that would potentially be a right! Yes 4 years!
English

@SmolDickMusk @dnalerinrehtron I don’t know about in other countries but in the US this is not a guarantee as it can be reversed on appeal by the merchant. I can’t imagine other countries not having this ability too. Now I don’t know what the decision wouldbe, I’m just saying that I worked for a bank & seen it
English

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... have to be returnable on demand for any reason, you can open and even use an item as you have a right to determine if an item is of 'metchantable quality' so yes, it can suck for online sellers and you just have to accept that returns, even fraudulent returns a fact of life!
English

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... The UK is a bit more unique as not only visa/mastercard chargeback rules but consumer law is strong too. A companies own 'refund policy' is arbitrary. A company can say 'all sales final' or 'no refunds' however statute renders them mute. Any goods ordered mail order...
English

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... a chargeback as a given. That means a POD proving delivery on the agreed date/time, the right address and with proof of signature. Many delivery companies to make more sure now also lack GPS coordinates and take a photo of the item delivered.
English

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron ... deemed the cardholder is correct and the merchant is in the wrong. The liability and onus is on the metchant to prove it a valid charge and not on the customer to prove it isnt. For cardholder not present you best have absolute evidence goods were delivered otherwise...
English

@suddenlysally @dnalerinrehtron I know chargebacks really well, I was a legal professional early on working in Visa! The Visa and Madtercard chargeback rules are international. The position of both Visa and Mastercard is simple - if a customer claims a charge as unauthorised or in dispute then it is...
English

@MillieCheesey @silentbobni @forevershallon @SVPhillimore Laughable silliness by the usual far right knuckle dragging bigots, losers and pathetic little whiny tantrum throwing little girls! Do better please! 🙏
English

@silentbobni @SmolDickMusk @forevershallon @SVPhillimore Foe someone pretending to be smart that sure is a choice spelling of lawyer.
English

@LaydenRobinson @elonmusk Fuck me thats tiny trace amounts of fentanyl, heck i wear a 50mcg/hour patch! Funnily enough i dont magically stop breathing! Again minute trace amounts of THC. Nuce try sweetie, you got nothing!
English



@bootscooterld @Axitrex @elonmusk Hang Chauvin. That or the elrctric chair. Life for a life, end of. Do it today. I hear a good salty meal before the electric chair works well as a final meal zappy⚡️ zappy ⚡️
English

@Logosintell @elonmusk Not really. His life matters no more than anyone elses.
English

@SonofLiberty357 @elonmusk @PatriotErin Typical dishonesty by you racist fascist loonies. Suffocation wont leave a quantifiable injury. In takes extreme injury to damage the airway/larynx as its a strong bony system but very little to achieve asphyxiation and in very little time.
English

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Laughable! The Supreme Court is the highest jurisdiction in the UK however as a signatory member of the ECHR the UK agreed long ago that it is the final court arbitration and can rule over the UK as it did in Goodwin, further as Goodwin began in UK courts is final on them.
English

@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore The highest court in the land is powerless?
Hear yourself!
While you think ECtHR controls state lawmakers and law.
Too silly.
(And regarding your bedding on the ward provided for the opposite sex: breaches of the law are simply that. Compliance with the law isn't a choice.)
English

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore False. Again you are clueless and Ill disengage after this post as you are a delusional cult member. As per this it is 'for all purposes' as evidenced by a new birth certificate in that new sex and past sex protected from disclosure. Get over it!

English

@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore GRA concerns an ‘acquired gender’, not sex. (Note: the law is an absolute mess.)
Sex is an apparent human attribute. It isn’t and it can’t be a matter of secrecy. Sex recognition is a core human capacity driven by evolution.
You over-emphasise the importance of Goodwin and I.
English

@BirdThe86733 @SVPhillimore Irrelevant. The scope of GRA wasnt marriage but to change sex and gender for all purposes and that vetbiage remains on statue even now! No the ECHR case of Goodwin v UK was beyond marriage, that was the risk UK courts/UK took by saying no to Ms Goodwin and ECHR took the case!
English

@SmolDickMusk @SVPhillimore Mr Goodwin can today marry whoever he wishes and will receive his pension at the same age as everyone else.
The reasons for GRA in 2004 are now moot.
English

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore You seem utterly clueless as to law, its understandsble as your head is stick in girly gossip group cults. Most cults dont like their beliefs challenged.
English

@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore I’m referring to the two cases before ECtHR and judgments. Which only concerned the ‘post-operative’.
English

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore GRA didnt need to consider 'third party rights' its entire purpose was to change sex and gender for all purposes. You were considered just that your right werent compatible therefore excluded as the UK hadnt a choice over GRA! Your rights arent above trans peoples, get over it!
English

@SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Marriage (and pensions) was central to the passing of GRA. So much so, that had marriage equality come first, there would be no Act. It staved that off.
Marriage & pension equality nullify the practical purpose of GRC.
Most importantly, GRA failed to consider third-party rights
English












